Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I have had it with trashing Michael Moore [View all]Oneironaut
(5,761 posts)210. Sorry, but the Democratic party does need trashing.
It needs a literal trashing of the status quo, and new faces. We're losing badly because people don't trust us anymore. Michael Moore is absolutely right.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
219 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A lot of DUers turned on MM when he predicted, in September, that Trump would win.
CrispyQ
Jan 2017
#131
I started to read that some time ago, and stopped. It bummed me out too much.
BlancheSplanchnik
Jan 2017
#156
His speech started out great until he started to trash Democrats. Sorry you don't use the women's
still_one
Jan 2017
#5
That wasn't the forum for it, and his endorsement of DNC chair sure was literal. Let me make it cle
still_one
Jan 2017
#21
+1, we have 3 damn good candidates for running the DNC... no need to trash either one
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#32
When he started to rant against the DNC, Ashley Judd cut him off, before he could try and
still_one
Jan 2017
#173
Reality is if you attack supporters you may suffer backlash. Same for everyone n/t
delisen
Jan 2017
#56
I think a large part of the problem is that those lived through the Depression, bringing forth
Hestia
Jan 2017
#138
Yeah, and what about the House, Senate, governeships, state legislatures, media
Crunchy Frog
Jan 2017
#59
The sad thing is that the Republicans have said and done things ...
Fantastic Anarchist
Jan 2017
#193
Critique and bashing are two different things, lets stop the needless bashing & lift up people
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#36
If its the whole truth so be it but 90% of the bashing is half truth which whole lie
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#204
It's probably against the rules to bash the Democratic Party...there are a lot of rules
TrekLuver
Jan 2017
#48
Yes, but we would be foolish to throw the baby out with the bath water. His "action plan"
Squinch
Jan 2017
#40
I have to go to the march, but for a speech that started so well, it ended on a divisive note
still_one
Jan 2017
#26
Yes, in a time when we are desperate for left leaning media. I don't always agree with him.
Rex
Jan 2017
#169
He is far more of an activists than the folks I see poo-pooing on him all the time.
Rex
Jan 2017
#171
I'm with just about anybody who is against this piece of Trash. But I can still differ
TrekLuver
Jan 2017
#22
A US Presidential election is a binary event. It's not a brilliant Prediction, its candidate A or
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#42
Nope, that is your opinion. There is nothing empirical to suggest that. It's still a coin toss
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#50
Nope, this isn't about that. You made a contention, you need to prove it. Nice try. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#78
All DUers have the authority to ask each other for proof. That has been part of DU from early on.
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#82
Nope, my only point was that our US presidential elections are binary so a prediction one will win
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#86
Nope, your idea was opinion, mine was fact. Two candidates, binary. End of story. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#91
Nope, it's still the same odds as a coin toss. Here is what Moore did NOT predict
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#58
The so what is, he predicted a coin toss. Congrats, he said heads and it was heads.
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#101
So, in essence, you're saying it was more complicated than a coin flip.
Fantastic Anarchist
Jan 2017
#198
Exactly. Those were the major factors, especially the FBI/Comey interference. What you have just
still_one
Jan 2017
#202
Statistically it absolutely is fairly close, even taking into account the worst blowout elections
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#74
Sure it is, depending on application and in this one it is, I'll break it down for you.
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#98
You've demonstrated that you can successfully subtract 50 from 60 and 40 from 50
fishwax
Jan 2017
#126
Nope, because I ask people to prove their assertions. You can't so you don't like that. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#80
Nope, thanks for proving MY point. Which you do more thoroughly with each comment. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#83
Thanks again for proving there is nothing to Moores prediction. You keep coming up empty. nt
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#88
No, because many people thought that Clinton had the election in the bag.
Fantastic Anarchist
Jan 2017
#196
I would agree with that. Smart, heart in the right place, but flawed to the point that he harms
stevenleser
Jan 2017
#46
He is a strong feminist and his speech was important. We need to Hound congress and run for office.
JudyM
Jan 2017
#52
I have been an active Democrat for 50 years. Several members of my family work...
Walk away
Jan 2017
#217
not that many, as it devolved for abit into 2 kids swatting at each other!!
jodymarie aimee
Jan 2017
#137
Yes, and I'm tired of people trashing Bernie too. Hilary lost to vote suppression in swing states,
diane in sf
Jan 2017
#142
Michael Moore wants to throw the democratic leadership and half the party out of office
BlueStateLib
Jan 2017
#179
A better strategy is to go after Republicans rather trying to defeat Democrtats and
BlueStateLib
Jan 2017
#209
I don't always agree with him, but I always believe his heart is in the right place.
spooky3
Jan 2017
#184