Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2017, 03:28 PM Feb 2017

Neither Ellison nor Perez should be chair. It should be Jason Kander (or someone like him). [View all]

Last edited Wed Feb 22, 2017, 04:19 PM - Edit history (1)

This seems rather obvious to me but there are two important reasons why the DNC leader should be viewed as a process leader and leave all ideological battles alone and concentrate on candidate recruitment and process issues like vote suppression and vote security. It seems equally obvious why ANY SURROGATE like Ellison or Perez should NOT be considered for chair.

1) If a surrogate is chosen then at lease half of the party is going to bear a grudge and feel that they were screwed.

2) The DNC chair really has zero impact on legislative issues. The job of the DNC is to boost involvement of Democrats in every area. The new chairperson should be seen as someone that will have no problem getting people more involved in Memphis, Salt Lake City and Tucson as they do in San Francisco, Seattle and Vermont.

We have people that can do this.

Here is my favourite, Jason Kander




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Kander

Jason Kander (born May 4, 1981) is an American lawyer and politician. A member of the Democratic Party, he was elected Secretary of State of Missouri in 2012, serving from 2013 to 2017. He previously served as a state representative. He was an intelligence officer in the Army National Guard, achieving the rank of Captain. He was the Democratic nominee for the United States Senate, losing the 2016 Senate election to Republican incumbent Roy Blunt.[1] Kander is also the founder of an organization called "Let America Vote", a campaign dedicated to ending voter suppression and gerrymandering.

I fault Sanders for taking the first shot with his early endorsement of Ellison, especially galling that he continues to interfere in a party he refuses to join. I also fault Clinton/Obama forces for taking the bait.

Both Ellison/Perez have shown that they are poor choices for playing out the endorsement game. Each should have said that they are not surrogates for anyone and concentrated on process issues. If Ellison thinks that by becoming chairperson he will be in a position to advance his personal agenda then he is not very clued in to what the constraints of the DNC chairs is going to be and is going to find a lot of areas of the country that are not going to respond.

Kander is a Democrat who wins in a red state and founded an organization dedicated to stopping voter suppression and gerrymandering.

He also knows how to send a message

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Like your thought process. northoftheborder Feb 2017 #1
I think Jason Kander would be great. I didn't know he was running for DNC chair. underthematrix Feb 2017 #2
He's not, but he should grantcart Feb 2017 #7
Okay this is just a wish list. If he were running I don't think anyone else underthematrix Feb 2017 #11
There are other consensus folks who concentrate on process issues who could be chair grantcart Feb 2017 #19
I'm AA and I think Dems are gonna have to accept the truth underthematrix Feb 2017 #24
I understand what you are saying but I don't agree about grantcart Feb 2017 #26
K&R NCTraveler Feb 2017 #3
I would prefer someone without Phoenix61 Feb 2017 #4
As a Sanders supporter... bunnies Feb 2017 #5
Agree 100%. ATL Ebony Feb 2017 #17
Kander is the real deal he scares Missouri deplorables. gordianot Feb 2017 #6
He seems to be of the future...and we can leave this bitter proxy war behind. Demsrule86 Feb 2017 #9
Ugh. I am beginning to think you are right. Actually, Martin O'Malley would make a great pick La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2017 #8
Kander isn't running. KittyWampus Feb 2017 #10
Never heard of him, but at this point I don't really care all that much. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2017 #12
Buttigieg is young, from Indiana, supports the 50 state strategy, and is a protg of Howard Dean DFW Feb 2017 #13
He also worked for Kerry but he has his own style and wins reelection with80% grantcart Feb 2017 #22
I like Kander a lot, too. Like all our prospects, actually. blm Feb 2017 #14
Jason Kander Fielg Feb 2017 #15
Reality sucks: Kander's not running brooklynite Feb 2017 #16
In that case take Pete Buttigieg who is a candidate grantcart Feb 2017 #21
Buttigieg seems quite capable... k8conant Feb 2017 #29
All in for Kander lynintenn Feb 2017 #18
he may be the ideal presidential candidate MyMission Feb 2017 #20
My preference is for Ellison, who's shown he knows how to build an organization and turnout machine. geek tragedy Feb 2017 #23
Ellison inherited one of the safest seats in the country grantcart Feb 2017 #25
I'm not so surprised by him winning but by boosting turnout there, to the point geek tragedy Feb 2017 #28
He got 12.000 less votes in 2016 than 2014. grantcart Feb 2017 #30
Low blows are often errant. geek tragedy Feb 2017 #32
Our Veterans group has meet Kander animity Feb 2017 #27
You have proved my point 100%. To the Sanders followers its grantcart Feb 2017 #31
Ellison holds edge in DNC race survey (The Hill) Equinox Moon Feb 2017 #33
kick grantcart Feb 2017 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Neither Ellison nor Perez...