General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Moore and Krugman piss on the ACA decision [View all]stupidicus
(2,570 posts)the long and short of it is as I conclude my responses here -- my subject line and the quotes from them was smartasshood in response to an all too common theme/result of straying too far from "the dems/BHO do no wrong, ergo diseent and criticism of them is verbotten" I had read that were applicable to this specific case -- the "victory".
It's almost like my commentary that pretty much matched their own in the way you cited, and that I wove the above into, was ignorant incongruity and inconsistency rather than the deliberate act that it was.
I have no problem with what Moore and Krugman wrote, I have a problem with the way so many think about and act upon the criticisms others around here offer regarding BHO and the dem leadership and their work products. Others were writing about "the pissing" others here were doing in the wake of the decision, which was no doubt far more about the flaws they see in the law rather than any desire to have seen it struck completely down over those flaws.
and I could hardly make this a specific callout to named posters or posts without fear of editorial reprisal, just as they didn't, now could I?
Apparently I was too subtle for those without a guilty conscience, who knew exactly what I was posting about if they read it.