Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
160. ... in the other post (#88) I said "fairly certain".
Thu Apr 13, 2017, 05:21 AM
Apr 2017

Last edited Thu Apr 13, 2017, 05:51 AM - Edit history (1)

Like I said, I do remember it. But I'm not invested enough to try and track down the 40 or so threads that stupid fight spawned to prove my point. I fully concede I could be wrong, although I am 100% certain there was some over-the-top hyperbole along those lines thrown out during those fun (cough) times. What the exact wording was, I don't know, and to hunt it via google that's probably what you'd need. Search function on DU would be even worse.

As for the bodies... hell, it's pretty obvious there was probably some photoshop involved; probably more than in the above banana sling picture, although it's also possible photo manipulation has advanced significantly in the intervening years. Still, I remember DU arguing more about butts than anything else. I can't find all the threads, but I can still find the cover itself, and given the layout of the thing, that makes sense.

Now, I do remember going to college with some extremely attractive young ladies, and I think some of the discussion (again, as I remember it) around the SI issue women was "it is physically impossible to have a body like that"- and I suppose one could say the same thing about Cap'm Banana up there...

still, I swear I remember some VERY attractive and fit bodies, from back in those days.

But, then, I also acknowledge that my memory may be questionable.

People find all kinds of things offensive jberryhill Apr 2017 #1
It was removed and the poster blocked for a week on a liberal site. William769 Apr 2017 #21
Yes, and? jberryhill Apr 2017 #48
The OP is titled from the article. William769 Apr 2017 #49
Are you the only one? No, but it is normal to at least attribute jberryhill Apr 2017 #50
I used DU's 4 paragraph rule with a link to the article. William769 Apr 2017 #52
Wow, Seems you hit Some Nerves bitterross Apr 2017 #115
Who in this thread is offended in that manner? Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #122
I Cannot Say What Others Feel, However... bitterross Apr 2017 #136
Oh, yeah, and I stand by that. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #138
If you highlight the text and click the "excerpt" button above the text box, you will get a nice tblue37 Apr 2017 #68
Thank you for your kind response & tip. William769 Apr 2017 #69
You are welcome. It took me a year or more before I figured out how other people were getting tblue37 Apr 2017 #73
You can teach an old dog new tricks. William769 Apr 2017 #74
now i have to try that orleans Apr 2017 #188
If you highlight something and then hit blockquote, it offsets the text. tblue37 Apr 2017 #189
ahhhhh..... very cool. thanks for the example. n/t orleans Apr 2017 #195
I used to know how to make the damn gray box a different color, even. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #190
I don't know how to color the box on DU, but to color your tblue37 Apr 2017 #192
Yeah, there was a way to use the hex codes to change the box color Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #193
i don't know. maybe we're just getting old orleans Apr 2017 #194
I'm certainly too old to wear undies like that in the shower. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #196
You mean there are liberal websites with user communities even MORE old and cranky than DU? Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #97
"old and cranky"? nocalflea Apr 2017 #102
Sarcasm is tough, on the internet. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #105
I get ya. But , if you can't take the heat. .. nocalflea Apr 2017 #106
Im just hoping to avoid Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #109
You slay ! - as usual nocalflea Apr 2017 #137
Thanks! Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #185
because penis? snooper2 Apr 2017 #128
people get outraged about the silliest things, don't they? Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #172
Potatoes can be bland. Chellee Apr 2017 #82
Ate you saying... GulfCoast66 Apr 2017 #142
LOL Chellee Apr 2017 #143
Obvious assets? guillaumeb Apr 2017 #2
Ah hahahahahahah. . .n/t annabanana Apr 2017 #3
Super funny Laf.La.Dem. Apr 2017 #10
Heres some audio for you. William769 Apr 2017 #20
He is hot....and he can sing Pachamama Apr 2017 #55
That debuted on July 4th 2016 on youtube. William769 Apr 2017 #58
I don't usually like country music, but I have to admit I like that song. Different Drummer Apr 2017 #63
It's not bad! Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #162
Besides being a 'gay country singer' is an oxymoron angstlessk Apr 2017 #4
My thought exactly LeftInTX Apr 2017 #19
Bwah! WinkyDink Apr 2017 #150
He's very handsome Beakybird Apr 2017 #5
OMG!!!! SpankMe Apr 2017 #6
LOL wryter2000 Apr 2017 #17
Love you comment. William769 Apr 2017 #23
For some reason I didn't notice that. Laffy Kat Apr 2017 #32
. Squinch Apr 2017 #53
No, can't say I noticed that at all. grossproffit Apr 2017 #61
Love your reply! herding cats Apr 2017 #86
You win the thread. lapucelle Apr 2017 #103
Hmmmm..... Heartstrings Apr 2017 #123
LOL chia Apr 2017 #135
It's not demonstrating proper shower hygiene Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #7
I can't believe I laughed. JTFrog Apr 2017 #40
Offensive or is it - - Laf.La.Dem. Apr 2017 #8
He's gorgeous greymattermom Apr 2017 #9
oh, you'd be amazed Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #147
As a hetro female TNLib Apr 2017 #11
Pffft..I'm a hetero male and I'd blow that guy, just out of respect. Volaris Apr 2017 #125
LOL TNLib Apr 2017 #131
... Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #182
What was the site? melman Apr 2017 #12
How DARE you. nolabear Apr 2017 #13
I might be in a minority here, but this really does nothing for me, I'm female and this shot a kennedy Apr 2017 #14
Honestly, I kid, but I'm the same way. Laffy Kat Apr 2017 #34
Me Three RobinA Apr 2017 #126
I don't seem to be offended. NCTraveler Apr 2017 #15
That's not my article. William769 Apr 2017 #24
Muscles like that make men/women look like insects. And the photo is not safe for work. KittyWampus Apr 2017 #16
so is his music crummy and he's compensating? msongs Apr 2017 #18
quite adequately it appears waddirum Apr 2017 #174
People go nuts over the SI swimsuit issue on many liberal sites. NewDealProgressive Apr 2017 #22
Yes melman Apr 2017 #25
Exactly. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #77
i hate to admit, i was afraid to comment because of fear of being labelled OMG YOU'RE A SEXIST steve2470 Apr 2017 #164
I know-I knew at the time from my PMs-- A lot of people were bullied into silence during that shit. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #165
"sitewide DEFCON 5 crisis" steve2470 Apr 2017 #166
I dont get it, either. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #167
totally agree nt steve2470 Apr 2017 #168
Ok, now I'm offended... cemaphonic Apr 2017 #179
You are, of course, correct. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #180
He wears underwear to take a shower??? greatauntoftriplets Apr 2017 #26
He's just cutting down on his laundry csziggy Apr 2017 #30
OMG! Thank you for making me laugh right out loud! skylucy Apr 2017 #36
If you've got that body, you're allowed to wear briefs. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #79
Those aren't actually underwear, technically. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #96
no, the gross part is he has streaks on the back side of his underwear snooper2 Apr 2017 #129
Silly, one of the many benefits of that "underwear" is, it doesn't HAVE a back side. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #163
I bet it would have been OK if it had been a woman. athena Apr 2017 #27
Exactly William769 Apr 2017 #28
Agreed. athena Apr 2017 #31
Bingo! nt JTFrog Apr 2017 #43
Oh, totally! Squinch Apr 2017 #51
No, it would have been alerted on. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #95
This message was self-deleted by its author Squinch Apr 2017 #127
I dont see anyone disturbed here. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #76
There it is loyalsister Apr 2017 #108
Or, maybe people just like to look at sexy attractive people of the opposite or same gender Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #110
Why not an attractive image that isn't objectifying? loyalsister Apr 2017 #112
People are sexually attracted to other people, often based upon physical appearance. This isn't Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #113
Sex, sexuality, and sexualizing people into objects loyalsister Apr 2017 #117
You should take it up with the OP, then. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #119
using your logic, cultures that strictly censor images of sex and nudity should be less misogynistic Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #183
no, actually, it would have spawned a month-long outrage, and anyone who rec'ced this thread Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #171
idk Flaleftist Apr 2017 #29
I am past the age of being offended by that... Moostache Apr 2017 #33
I wish I could rec this post. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #184
Why would a liberal site find it offensive? Are they overrun with conservative trolls? AgadorSparticus Apr 2017 #35
DING DING DING DING DING DING Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #81
you nailed it steve2470 Apr 2017 #130
Wrong crowd to find that offensive- Boxerfan Apr 2017 #37
What was the cropped version? Squinch Apr 2017 #38
Whatever gets you through the night. DefenseLawyer Apr 2017 #39
I imagine many people can say "whatever gets you through the night" to racist speech as well. LanternWaste Apr 2017 #41
"Good men doing nothing" about someone deciding of his/her own free will to pose for a sexy picture? Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #169
... Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #186
I suppose I could have stated that better. Iggo Apr 2017 #42
I wonder if you had cropped the pic at the navel if the same complaint would have occurred. LonePirate Apr 2017 #44
Except in my experience, at least on "progressive" sites, it's the same people who get upset. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #78
As George Takai would say..... dawnie51 Apr 2017 #45
The part that answers your own question is: UTUSN Apr 2017 #46
We're all adults, here. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #187
Gay country singer...that is NOT a job for the timid FDRsGhost Apr 2017 #47
As a Gay closeted Country music fan, I agree! William769 Apr 2017 #54
He looks like he works out mcar Apr 2017 #56
gee... ya think? Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #98
Eye Candy!! lunatica Apr 2017 #57
Huh. OriginalGeek Apr 2017 #59
Nice shower head. grossproffit Apr 2017 #60
I see what you did there. WinkyDink Apr 2017 #151
Personally I don't find nudity offensive and... WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #62
Seriously. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #80
Our puritanical roots run deep. I swear... WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #99
Not me. I'm built just like that dude in the picture. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #100
Well... WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #104
I don't see a problem here. smirkymonkey Apr 2017 #64
Not my thing, but I am not offended. NT Adrahil Apr 2017 #65
mine are larger Demonaut Apr 2017 #66
Mine too ornotna Apr 2017 #71
lol Demonaut Apr 2017 #93
That's not how you shower! Generic Brad Apr 2017 #67
thanks Bill ornotna Apr 2017 #70
I've always hated the term "sugar daddy" William769 Apr 2017 #72
... Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #116
We now know Steve Grand is circumcised. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #75
Please tell me you are kidding Coventina Apr 2017 #88
I wish I was. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #94
Unbelievably insensitive, to compare paid models to the victims of the Killing Fields. Coventina Apr 2017 #133
I have a friend who is a survivor of the killing fields. I interviewed him and survivors of three stevenleser Apr 2017 #145
Exactly. 3 women posing in bathing suits for a magazine isn't a "human rights atrocity" at all. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #148
A LITTLE WEIRD?!? A HERETIC I AM Apr 2017 #175
Hear ya. But at least the Moon Bombing was fun. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #181
When I searched for that Cambodian comment, betsuni Apr 2017 #156
There was a full month of multiple threads. Threads upon threads upon threads. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #157
Oh, I just thought that for the multiple times you referrenced it, you'd remember. betsuni Apr 2017 #158
... in the other post (#88) I said "fairly certain". Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #160
To play Devil's advocate - meadowlander Apr 2017 #83
If Pat Robertson says the beauty of the human body is a-okay why oasis Apr 2017 #84
Pat Robertson said that???? LeftInTX Apr 2017 #89
Pat said nude pix of Melinia Trump are "pure art". Surely he would oasis Apr 2017 #90
Oh Gawd, I thought it was Trump that said it LeftInTX Apr 2017 #91
Pat is so full of shit he's simply hard to take seriously enough to ridicule, if such a Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #111
Umm... Snopes... WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #101
Yeah, that makes more sense. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #114
The thought of Pat Robertson being... 3catwoman3 Apr 2017 #134
Oh. My. Goodness. herding cats Apr 2017 #85
it's offensive because... 0rganism Apr 2017 #87
You can kind of see his peen, I guess. BlueStater Apr 2017 #92
uhmn my eyes were kinda drawn to the package but I'm sure that's my problem hahahaha luvMIdog Apr 2017 #107
I don't find that offensive at all Docreed2003 Apr 2017 #118
I suspect it was the animation that did you in, there, doc Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #120
Lol...i suppose you're right Warren... Docreed2003 Apr 2017 #173
Because it's appeal is to both.... vi5 Apr 2017 #121
hummmm winetourdriver01 Apr 2017 #124
The same people offended by this were offended by the split-second revealing of Janet Jackson's..... steve2470 Apr 2017 #132
The most offensive thing that happened at the Super Bowl Halftime in the past 20 years? Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #139
aw :) nt steve2470 Apr 2017 #141
Apparently this man is being "objectified" Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #140
Concealed carry. milestogo Apr 2017 #144
....... JHan Apr 2017 #153
It's the mother of all bananas. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #170
hahahahaha luvMIdog Apr 2017 #178
From the article: Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #146
I'm offended by the silliness of his HAVING CLOTHES ON IN THE SHOWER! ;-) He's actually not as WinkyDink Apr 2017 #149
He looks kind of like an overly buffed Jakob Dylan, to me. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #154
Because Mike Pence could NOT eat alone with that ad. VOX Apr 2017 #152
Mike Pence...alone...the ad.....The mind gags! WinkyDink Apr 2017 #155
Indeed. Sorry for the retch-worthy imagery! VOX Apr 2017 #161
well kcdoug1 Apr 2017 #159
Not really my type Warpy Apr 2017 #176
Nothing's as sexy as a brain, I agree. Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #177
Oh baby lillypaddle Apr 2017 #191
So melman Apr 2017 #197
I'm still waiting for the flood of outraged, homoeroticism-traumatized dudebros we were promised Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #198
So what's the verdict, Bill? Warren DeMontague Apr 2017 #199
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Is This Photo Deeply ...»Reply #160