Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Quixote1818

(28,946 posts)
Sun Apr 30, 2017, 04:56 AM Apr 2017

There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of what Sanders goals are [View all]

Last edited Sun Apr 30, 2017, 11:54 AM - Edit history (2)

He is not trying to be a leader to Democrats as a recent post suggests, he is doing his own thing and if you like what he is about like getting money out of politics, I am sure he doesn't care if you are a Democrat and Independent or even a moderate Republican.

I think we have to go back to Ronald Reagan's dismantling of the Unions to get a clear picture of what is going on here. Unions use to be our primary source of money but when they were crushed during the 80's Reagan didn't just win a battle he pretty much won the war because Democrats were forced to look elsewhere for cash and Bill Clinton was a major pioneer in going after Wall Street money. At the time it seemed to be a necessary deal with the devil but it was the beginning of a long term demise of the middle class with neither party's major funding coming from labor but greedy Wall Street. The New Deal would slowly be dismantled after this. Over the years it has gotten worse and worse with few bills represent the people no matter which party is in office:



Don't get me wrong because while Dems have problems Republican's are bat shit crazy and Susan Sarandon and Jill Stein are lunatics who were playing with fire big time! I voted enthusiastically for Hillary a month early because I have common sense even if I am an idealist and want the system completely fixed. My guess is that Sanders has the same outlook or else he would not have endorsed Hillary and stumped for her.

So Democratic candidates have two choices. I am not saying one is bad but in a perfect world one is clearly better than the other. Sometimes you have to be a realist and take what you can get in a corrupt system, I understand that. The choices are to accept that the Gov. is run by Wall Street and big donors and make deals with them to get a few things through for the middle class or take the ENTIRE establishment head on; enter that nutty Bernie Sanders. To be fair, few candidates have the luxury of doing this. Sanders is in a unique position where he doesn't have to worry about biting the hand that feeds him.

This type of bold move is going to make you lots of enemies even with people you might have the same values with. You may even look like you are anti Democratic Party from time to time even if you favor it's views 100 times that of the Republicans. This type of move is a very difficult balancing act where you are taking on the power brokers of both parties to try to unravel decades of power structures. It's messy as hell and dam near impossible to achieve or should I say Quixotic? We must remember that Sanders isn't a Democrat or a Republican for a reason. It's so he can call the shots as he sees them and sometimes he may seem off balance or actually really is is wrong because he is not perfect and can make mistakes like anyone. But I do believe he is trying to get money and corruption out of both parties and I think he is sincere about this. I think he has dedicated every fiber of his being to this in the same way he chained himself to the black civil rights protester. Is there some ego involved? Probably but I see a bit of ego in pretty much everyone who runs for office.

I am a life long FDR Democrat and I would love to see the party get back to its roots and make a clean break from all the money coming from the wrong people. This is not easily done for a million reasons and where does the money come from now if we walk away from Wall Street? What is encouraging is that some grass roots candidates are able to raise enough money directly from the people and this is a real threat to the establishment.

I don't see Sanders as a Democratic leader but more like if the country of Switzerland was a person and was trying to impact our political system. This fellow Mr. Switzerland is a progressive guy but not a "Democrat". He has his own goals just like Sanders has his own goals but he is not bound by any party. As a lifelong Democrat I welcome any inroads he can make to get corrupt money out of my party.

As another DUer puts it. These are the things BS is fighting for and they are right in line with what made the party great when FDR was president:

From DUer Akamai https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8996693

"Income And Wealth Inequality,
Making College Tuition Free And Debt-Free,
Getting Big Money Out Of Politics And Restoring Democracy,
Creating Decent Paying Jobs,
A Living Wage,
Combating Climate Changes In The Planet,
A Fair And Humane Immigration Policy,
Racial Justice,
Fighting For Affordable Housing,
Fighting For Women's Rights,
Working To Create An Aids And HIV-Free Generation,
Fighting For LGBT And Quality,
Empowering Tribal Nations,
Caring For Veterans,
Medicare For All,
Strengthen And Expand Social Security,
Fighting To Lower Prescription Drug Prices,
Fighting For Disability Rights,
Etc.

End Quote
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K&R! nt riderinthestorm Apr 2017 #1
Message deleted by DU the Administrators List left Apr 2017 #2
That may be his GOAL, but the EFFECT is he depresses the vote for Democrats pnwmom Apr 2017 #3
We can't win without Independents. tecelote Apr 2017 #8
And where is your evidence that he increases the number of Independents who vote Democratic pnwmom Apr 2017 #16
Still talking about the primaries? tecelote Apr 2017 #19
The post you responded to was about the General election, so why R B Garr Apr 2017 #41
It has to be about party support if you want to win. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #36
"it's not about party support...." Adrahil Apr 2017 #51
If people are indeed "depressed", ain't that a reflection of the other candidates... KeepItReal Apr 2017 #12
Exactly!!! chwaliszewski Apr 2017 #4
You may be correct GulfCoast66 Apr 2017 #44
Whatever.. BS goes about them by insulting the Democratic Cha Apr 2017 #5
You tell'em, Cha! chwaliszewski Apr 2017 #6
Voter suppression, including purging, removed millions of mostly minority voters from the rolls. pnwmom Apr 2017 #18
I can play the guilt game, too. chwaliszewski Apr 2017 #23
Bernie and Hillary negotiated the Democratic platform together, so if you think they were pnwmom Apr 2017 #48
So the Democratic Party refuses to take Wall Street money OnDoutside May 2017 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author KTM Apr 2017 #26
We had everything in 2008. And then some stayed home and allowed the GOP to take the House and the Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #34
Ah, yes. Jill Stein. *sigh* chwaliszewski May 2017 #56
There was enough votes that Stein took...that would have potentially swung the race to Clinton. Demsrule86 May 2017 #59
Again, you're not getting it. chwaliszewski May 2017 #60
She is spoiler...and a putin girl as well...completely worthless...scammed people about the recount. Demsrule86 May 2017 #62
Wrong. Again. chwaliszewski May 2017 #64
This EffieBlack May 2017 #61
So yay! Let's try a whole new method! Ninsianna May 2017 #53
We betrayed our core principles when we starting cozying up with Wall St. chwaliszewski May 2017 #55
The core principle that's being betrayed here is the commitment to education Ninsianna May 2017 #58
Neither Insulting Nor Normalizing KTM Apr 2017 #28
BS calling the Democratic Party "feeble" and "they can't Cha Apr 2017 #29
Perhaps you dont remember KTM Apr 2017 #31
Those efforts to send plastic spines were utterly stupid mythology Apr 2017 #35
When the criticism is as twisted as Fox News, yeah. KTM Apr 2017 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author JudyM Apr 2017 #50
Sing it. Couldn't agree more. JudyM Apr 2017 #52
G*O*D*B*L*E*S*S*Y*O*U!!!!!! BigBearJohn Apr 2017 #7
... Highway61 Apr 2017 #27
He should step down from the Outreach role and he should not have participated in the Unity tour. seaglass Apr 2017 #9
OP is wrong and your response shows why. Sanders absolutely accepted a leadership role stevenleser May 2017 #65
Thank you for this post. democrank Apr 2017 #10
Thank you!!! HootieMcBoob Apr 2017 #11
K+Rnt m-lekktor Apr 2017 #13
LOL NurseJackie Apr 2017 #14
His campaign proved that the total breakaway can work. RDANGELO Apr 2017 #15
Reagan did not "crush unions." He dismantled one, the Air Traffic Controllers. WinkyDink Apr 2017 #17
Sure, it's more complicated than what I wrote but I was trying to stay focused Quixote1818 Apr 2017 #39
Don't tell me what to think or where I belong. leftofcool Apr 2017 #20
My apologies, I took that last part off Quixote1818 Apr 2017 #43
Very well said Highway61 Apr 2017 #21
His raison d'etre, like anybody to the left of Genghis Khan , should be to see Trump defeated . DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2017 #22
Very true. That should also apply to the people here QC Apr 2017 #30
I have no interest in primaries, but when I hear someone praising Trump for his awful Korean policy, Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #33
Praise? QC Apr 2017 #38
Yes praise and it has been repeated ad nauseum by the right wing. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #42
China IS in fact the key. panader0 Apr 2017 #45
He said Trump was right...that is what the point is...he could have said the 'key is China'. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #49
Well said. n/t ms liberty Apr 2017 #24
"Who does not agree with the issues above? brer cat Apr 2017 #25
Not this again...people support the issues...Democratic party issues in fact. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #32
The problem is your assumption of a monolithic "They" KTM Apr 2017 #46
Thank you for trying to start an intelligent discussion of issues here. QC Apr 2017 #40
Quixote1818, I am an FDR Democrat as well! lovemydogs Apr 2017 #47
I don't see any simarlity between FDR and Bernie Sanders Expecting Rain May 2017 #54
*******DING DING DING DING DING !!!! ****** FACT FILLED POST !!!! uponit7771 May 2017 #63
Seaglass' #9 nails why your OP has it wrong and obviously so. Nt stevenleser May 2017 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There seems to be a funda...