Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How's that "Trump Russia Collusion is bullshit" working for the Jackass Radicals these days? [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)47. A lot of the defenders, and there are three posting comments here don't realize they are obvious
no one here is fooled. These folks agree with the totally over the top batshit nonsense being posted over at JPR.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How's that "Trump Russia Collusion is bullshit" working for the Jackass Radicals these days? [View all]
stevenleser
May 2017
OP
They're embarrassed that they got played by Asssange, Greewald and Guccifer....
bettyellen
May 2017
#6
Well it certainly says something about those who constantly defend them and take issue with the fact
JTFrog
May 2017
#41
A lot of the defenders, and there are three posting comments here don't realize they are obvious
stevenleser
May 2017
#47
What's ironic is those people have the same opinion of HRC as you did in 2008.
Hassin Bin Sober
May 2017
#18
You guys can bring up whataboutism, straw men and other logical fallacies all you want
stevenleser
May 2017
#34
In 2008 when Hillary wasn't my candidate, I didnt believe GOP conspiracies against her
stevenleser
May 2017
#79
Most seem to be very educated people who cannot process the information they retain.
NCTraveler
May 2017
#20
Everyone on both fringes always thinks they have the key to motivating non voters
stevenleser
May 2017
#46
If you are reading it then you are intentionally mistating what is written. nt
stevenleser
May 2017
#65
Nope, you never do that, you pretty much always employ logical fallacies. nt
stevenleser
May 2017
#71
PP spent years polluting the LatAm forum with predictions of the impending US invasion of Venezuela
Zorro
May 2017
#69
They have a lot of sacred cows at stake that prevents them from dealing with facts in this situation
stevenleser
May 2017
#40
And that is one of many completely insane lines of thinking promulgated there.
stevenleser
May 2017
#56
I'm not surprised. Besides the spaghetti logic, they have a lingo based on conspiracy theories
stevenleser
May 2017
#58