Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
54. We DO know that Nunes is currently being investigated by the House Ethics
Sat Jun 3, 2017, 04:17 AM
Jun 2017

Last edited Sat Jun 3, 2017, 05:32 AM - Edit history (1)

Committee.

"If there had been a complaint and an investigation of Nunes by the Republican majority house we'd know."

Yes, we would know and we do know. He IS being investigated, even though the House has a Republican majority. In fact, even though the Ethics Committee comprises equal numbers of R's and Dems, it elected to start "the Nunes investigation on its own," rather than wait for the Office of Congressional Ethics to consider it first.

This is the most recent release by the House Ethics Committee:

http://ethics.house.gov/media-center

"The Committee is aware of public allegations that Representative Devin Nunes may have made unauthorized disclosures of classified information, in violation of House Rules, law, regulations, or other standards of conduct. The Committee, pursuant to Committee Rule 18(a), is investigating and gathering more information regarding these allegations.

"The Committee has determined to investigate these allegations in order to fulfill its institutional obligation, under House Rule X, clause 11(g)(4), to investigate certain allegations of unauthorized disclosures of classified information, and to determine if there has been any violation of the Code of Official Conduct under House Rule XXIII, clause 13. The Committee notes that the mere fact that it is investigating these allegations, and publicly disclosing its review, does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred, or reflect any judgment on behalf of the Committee.

" In order to comply with Committee Rule 7 regarding confidentiality, out of fairness to all respondents, and to assure the integrity of its work, the Committee will refrain from making further public statements on this matter pending completion of its initial review."

______________________________________________-



The Ethics Committee elected to start the investigation and, with an evenly divided membership, at least one Republican must have joined the Democrats in making the decision.

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-nunes-intelligence-committee-20170525-story.html

"The House Ethics Committee has no deadline to finish its work, and such investigations can take months, or years. Rob Walker, former chief counsel and staff director of the Senate and House ethics committees, said the investigation is probably still in the information-gathering stage, and staff members will have to get security clearance to even get access to some of the intelligence information in question.

SNIP

"The committee has oversight over questions of how classified information is handled. It started the investigation into Nunes' conduct on its own, rather than following normal procedure of having the nonpartisan Office of Congressional Ethics take a precursory look."
________________________

As of May 30, according to the WA Post, the investigation was still ongoing. More info here:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=9152512

+1 Me. Jun 2017 #1
I'll believe that when it comes from a real news source. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #2
What you said. Amaryllis Jun 2017 #10
Ditto, sounds like unreliable information Kleveland Jun 2017 #11
Right. This story is two days old and I haven't seen it picked up anywhere else. Surely it would Midnight Writer Jun 2017 #13
It's been more than 2 months since he let slip the classified info -- pnwmom Jun 2017 #15
Like I said - I'll believe this when it turns up on a real news source. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #16
If you make a financial contributions to her account that will grantcart Jun 2017 #26
Ah. I see. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #30
well that sounds like happy news nt msongs Jun 2017 #3
House intelligence chair gets security clearance revoked. How awesome is that! unblock Jun 2017 #4
Isn't Trump the only one who can do that? n/t Tarheel_Dem Jun 2017 #5
no. the president does not grant or remove clearances. drray23 Jun 2017 #8
I asked because I heard on MSNBC that Dems were demanding that Kushner's clearance be... Tarheel_Dem Jun 2017 #52
I've got news for you FBaggins Jun 2017 #61
I hope this comes to fruition, I truly do. FlightRN Jun 2017 #6
Give horse a new set of shoes and a Bon Voyage party Warpy Jun 2017 #7
He has abused his security clearance, his games he has played with trump was not Thinkingabout Jun 2017 #9
K & R L. Coyote Jun 2017 #12
Is there another source to this story? kentuck Jun 2017 #14
Not that I could find. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #18
If it is not on CNN or MSNBC... kentuck Jun 2017 #20
The people who are doing the real digging are at the Washington Post and the NY Times. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #22
True. kentuck Jun 2017 #58
Um, patriobotics is a crackpot website. PSPS Jun 2017 #17
hah crackpotics, if you will tandem5 Jun 2017 #21
More Mensch Bullshit: Members of Congress don't have to get security clearances onenote Jun 2017 #19
Page 4 talks about them not needing security clearances, pnwmom Jun 2017 #23
FFS. Members of Congress don't go through background checks or get clearances. Period. onenote Jun 2017 #25
That's kind of scary when you consider some of the people who are in the House.... The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #27
Maybe so, but its always been this way. onenote Jun 2017 #28
They don't receive the same security clearances other people do. pnwmom Jun 2017 #32
But that's not what Mensch's gossip item says. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #36
No, you misquoted her. pnwmom Jun 2017 #38
But he never had a TOP SECRET clearance to revoke! The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #42
And what does that have to do with what Mensch wrote. Nothing. onenote Jun 2017 #39
Wrong. She did not say he had his security clearance revoked. pnwmom Jun 2017 #40
He never had a TOP SECRET clearance to revoke! The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #43
I'll try one more time. Members of Congress don't get security clearances. onenote Jun 2017 #44
Where is your link showing that they have access to even the highest levels pnwmom Jun 2017 #37
Where is your link that says they don't? onenote Jun 2017 #41
None of the links here have addressed the issue of consequences, pnwmom Jun 2017 #47
I give up. Believe what you want. One of these days you'll realize what a fraud Mensch is. onenote Jun 2017 #49
The intelligence committees are given classified info as needed for their work. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #29
So, since he recused himself, they shouldn't be giving him materials pnwmom Jun 2017 #33
They give the information to the committees, which are responsible The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #34
True; classified materials given to congressional committees are handled like this: The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #24
Your second link says, "The legal ramifications are murky." pnwmom Jun 2017 #35
The paragraph you cite about consequences relates to staffers, who DO have to get clearances. onenote Jun 2017 #46
I agree the wording was confusing, but House members DO receive training pnwmom Jun 2017 #48
It's not confusing to anyone but you. onenote Jun 2017 #50
Thanks for this. I don't understand why Mensch and BFF Claude Taylor, The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #51
We DO know that Nunes is currently being investigated by the House Ethics pnwmom Jun 2017 #54
if this were true it would be all over the news. hrmjustin Jun 2017 #31
Once again, Mensch is publishing a "story" that can't be true. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #45
Have you forgotten that the House Ethics Committee is currently investigating pnwmom Jun 2017 #53
The House Ethics Committee doesn't impose sanctions, it recommends them onenote Jun 2017 #55
If they have limited his access to top secret or SCIF materials while they investigate pnwmom Jun 2017 #56
Uhhhh. The rules of the Committee and the House? onenote Jun 2017 #59
+1000 Cattledog Jun 2017 #57
Well, that sounds like big news, for sure. MineralMan Jun 2017 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion» Devin Nunes Has Top Secr...»Reply #54