Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
6. that's spending, not investments. i mean investments, like bonds, etc. as i recall, stockton was
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 02:10 AM
Jul 2012

Last edited Sun Jul 8, 2012, 02:54 AM - Edit history (3)

conned into taking on some shady investments -- maybe related to mortgage derivatives or something similar.

i'll google around tomorrow & see if i can confirm my memory.

on edit: what happened was calpers invested stockton's pension $$$ in mortgage-related shit.

In 2007, the city borrowed $125 million and put the money into Calpers, the giant California pension fund, betting that investment managers could earn more than the interest Stockton owed on the debt. When the market tanked, Calpers lost 24%-30% of the loan's principal, according to city budget documents.

i also found out that stockton has about half their "pension obligations" in hand (cash or convertible). what i couldn't find was what kind of actuarial window they're basing that on. which i'd like to, because if they're using, e.g., a 75-year window like Social security does, this bankruptcy may be a kind of scam as well.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bankrupt California city ...»Reply #6