Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DaDeacon

(984 posts)

15. yep I agree

Reply to jmg257 (Reply #8)

Wed Jun 14, 2017, 12:36 PM

Jun 2017

BUT the events are awful convenient. We need a new distraction and ohh look a mass shooting and it's aginst the political party that is under security. Shoot now it's being used to ask our side to stop pushing the "destructive partisan narrative". Give them the benefit of the dought if you want to fine not me, not this time. BTW the pool shows I am not alone.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jun 2017 OP

Wouldn't be the only mass shooting claimed to be false... jmg257 Jun 2017 #1

Didn't say it was false... DaDeacon Jun 2017 #7

And sometimes shit just happens. whether we like it or not... jmg257 Jun 2017 #8

yep I agree DaDeacon Jun 2017 #15

Yep - like I said, conspiracy theories about shootings are a dime a dozen. jmg257 Jun 2017 #17

Yep. Remember Alex Jones and Sandy Hook. "Obama did it." TrishaJ Jun 2017 #25

I bet Obama did this one too! Dr. Strange Jun 2017 #31

Alex - welcome to DU nt hack89 Jun 2017 #2

I've been waiting thanks, lol. nt DaDeacon Jun 2017 #4

What you did there Alea Jun 2017 #32

Find out why he did it first. haele Jun 2017 #3

I'll trust what the FBI will say about it Wednesdays Jun 2017 #5

If you think the FBI would be willing to take part in a conspiracy if only hughee99 Jun 2017 #30

That's utter Alex Jones rubbish. longship Jun 2017 #6

No... DaDeacon Jun 2017 #10

How exactly did you come up with this ridiculous opinion? Bucky Jun 2017 #14

I used to be of the opinion that 2+2fish. LanternWaste Jun 2017 #20

I require hard proof before giving any Conspiracy theory the slightest consideration. Nt LostOne4Ever Jun 2017 #9

No. Just no. n/t musicblind Jun 2017 #11

This makes DU look kooky. n/t demmiblue Jun 2017 #12

Thank you for your speculative nonsense based on zero evidence. Bucky Jun 2017 #13

This is exactly what the GOP does. Initech Jun 2017 #18

I said 'maybe' only because it was reported by a couple repugs it was about reight/left angstlessk Jun 2017 #16

Many people need to create imaginative scenarios to better validate their own biases and narratives. LanternWaste Jun 2017 #19

That's what Pierre Sallinger said in Thousand Days about the assassination of John Kennedy. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2017 #21

I don't mind being the "crazy". DaDeacon Jun 2017 #22

let's not confuse crazy with irrational. LanternWaste Jun 2017 #28

So you're saying Hodgkinson was working double-super-secret-background for Sessions.... Brother Buzz Jun 2017 #23

OK I'll say it...TRASHING brooklynite Jun 2017 #24

+1 onenote Jun 2017 #26

Oh, FFS. Not everything is a conspiracy. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #27

I'll do better sarisataka Jun 2017 #29

I do not know about this shooting but Doreen Jun 2017 #33