Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,222 posts)
18. SUPERB analysis of this, alcibiades_mystery! I think we're all starting to smarten up.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 04:26 PM
Jul 2012

So many of us are recognizing what's REALLY going on here.

This is IT.

It's all strategy. You accurately and shrewdly point out that they're used to this tactic working. Turn it back on the Dems and make them AND it the story. Deflect, deflect, and then deflect some more. But - gasp! - it isn't working. They can't deflect because this haughty elitist would-be king and his queen, the lady ann of dressage, are so accustomed to their word being taken as law instead of taken out for an un-spin-cycle spin. The questions keep coming and at least SOME reporters and writers and bloggers are smelling smoke and building themselves a hard-on to find the inevitable fire somewhere nearby.

And they're not used to this. They've been experts at attacking and deflecting and distracting for years! It's always worked the way they schemed and manipulated and timed and dictated. But it's always depended on the same accompanying conditions: that Dems would always cave, back down, capitulate, apologize, resign or otherwise fall on their swords, and go away quietly. These seem to be different Dems, though. They don't act as expected - OR AS PREDICTED. They're outside the comfortable, well-worn, long-established parameters of the playing field. It's a lot harder to manage. The GOP's desired result depends on a set group of conditions being met, establishing a climate, a foundation, that leads to that desired result. That's why they like to stack the deck. They're all about tilting the playing field. They have to - because that's the only way they're assured of winning. (Why do you think they're all over voter suppression at the state level these days?)

The nice thing here is this:
We talk a lot about battle tactics. Some of us have read or at least skimmed Sun Tzu's "The Art of War." Some here have studied other warriors' tactics and strategies, based on the premise that this is actually a war we're fighting. This is war. The other side has certainly declared it against us. The GOP is falling back on some of their old tricks. Their default positioning. Do this, the Dems react like that, then you close the deal by doing thus. It's worked for years! And what happens after you've seen the same tactics always work in the same way? You start getting used to it. It's always worked, so you figure it's always GONNA work. You have no evidence to the contrary - BECAUSE it's just always worked. So you fall into complacency and start getting arrogant, and maybe just a very tiny bit, you drop your guard a little. It's a pattern, a habit, and soon enough, a republi-CON "law of nature." It becomes an "IS" is you will. As in, this just IS. That's how it IS. Remember those snot-nosed rich ladies driving into and out of the romney fundraisers in the Hamptons - about how it just IS - the common people simply don't understand how things are and how things work. The template is in place.

Meanwhile, however, the opposition has changed it up a little. They're not following the unspoken rules about how they're supposed to react, and how their response is supposed to go. Suddenly, the ol' reliable template doesn't fit anymore. If you're suitably preconditioned to something always working the way you expect it to, you will be thrown for a loop as to how to respond when something suddenly STOPS working the way you expect it to. You won't have the ol' template to work from, because all of a sudden the template doesn't work in this case. THAT IS WHY so many teabaggers and other knuckledraggers have trouble articulating beyond the talking points and the bumper-sticker sloganeering. The response template was provided to them free, reinforced with repetition and effective results, and they didn't have to think about this or reason it out for themselves, and frankly, they didn't even have to understand it - just like we "common people" were told was how things work.

And what happens when you don't exercise your muscles? They become flabby. Then sometimes they go as far as to atrophy. Well - works the same way in the human mind. That's why so many experts recommend stuff that keeps the mind active - to Alzheimer's patients. Keep it exercised and nimble. That's not what the GOP has preconditioned most of its operatives below the rove/kristol/ailes/luntz/romney level on the zigurrat to respond to. They're all rendered a bit psychologically lazy, spoiled, and flabby after so many years of the same reliable template working for them so well, like it always did. But it's a mile wide and a millimeter deep. Barely scratch the surface or ask the wrong question or probe just a bit below the veneer and the whole thing starts to go to pieces. They have no experience or practice dealing with anything else.

They're probably gonna be hiring a whole bunch of crisis-management PR firms in the next week to try to get out in front of this again. But there may be nothing left to get out in front of. The train, as they say, may already have left the station with a solid majority of the electorate on it. Remember the mistakes of John Kerry and how easily he was swiftboated on his military experience. That meme was left un-tamped-down by his campaign until it had already started sinking in through the national pores. And once it did that, he was sunk. Oh yeah, he finally woke up and started raising a defense and tried to go on offense, but we waited for a week while the Kerry campaign did nothing and the questions grew and he just started looking worse and worse and fishier and fishier, and they gave up on their ivory-tower "don't DIGNIFY it with a response!" shit. Which clearly wasn't working. Once it seeps into the public consciousness - either consciously or unconsciously, the seeds of doubt are sown and take root. And the candidate is done. If this sinks in deep enough in the public mind, it won't matter how many hundreds of millions of dollars they throw mitt's way. The impression will have been made. First impressions and all that. And as we all know, if those first impressions are negative, you spend the rest of your life living them down.

The Dems just have to hold firm, defiant, NON-COMPLIANT and CERTAINLY non-apologetic, and keep asking questions. The enemy is all standing their with their dicks caught in their zippers and they do not know what to do or how to respond. This is unfamiliar territory to them and they don't have an effective counter-strategy for it. Blind-sided like Tom Cruise, who wasn't expecting any pushback from his "mousy little wife" he thought he knew and had under control, who'd never dare to defy him. Nicole Kidman let herself get rolled. Katie Holmes is DIFFERENT. Same thing going on there as the GOP is grappling with now. This is not the Nicole Kidman party they're dealing with (at least in this case). If this sinks in deeply enough, it may already be too late to turn around.

Funny - does that mean it's OUR turn to be the "Party of NO"?

Even the "common people" know when they start smelling a rat.

OH crap - ran too long again... sorry.

Hear Hear, Sir! The Magistrate Jul 2012 #1
or a black widow loves her web lonestarnot Jul 2012 #8
"Romney loves America like a tick loves a dog."- a like that - can we all use it or has it been Douglas Carpenter Jul 2012 #25
Free To All, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2012 #52
You know how Rove was with BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #2
Yeah Stand your ground, Sistah! tblue Jul 2012 #3
We have posters even here on DU saying the same thing. Ikonoklast Jul 2012 #4
strange isn't it? maddezmom Jul 2012 #6
Same ones, over and over. They parrot the talking points the very same day they come out. Ikonoklast Jul 2012 #7
Hopefully won't fall into the '...we'll assume you are rooting for the other side' category. freshwest Jul 2012 #20
Sorry, there's no excuse for sticking up for Romney here. Or promoting Rove's emulatorloo Jul 2012 #55
I agree with that, but that's not happening, is it? And who knows what Rove's latest strategy is? freshwest Jul 2012 #57
Here is the information you need about Bain and Romney. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #62
The sure do stand out like sore thumbs, don't they? NNN0LHI Jul 2012 #30
Really? MNBrewer Jul 2012 #35
Obviously I missed something. What? aquart Jul 2012 #54
here SemperEadem Jul 2012 #68
And the Obama campaign have been studying Rove for over a decade lunatica Jul 2012 #5
yes, axelrod is the smartest kid in the class..... madrchsod Jul 2012 #9
damn straight... Volaris Jul 2012 #31
Not if Texas has anything to do about it. Smilo Jul 2012 #67
LOL!...Shouldn't it be a requirement that Boards of Education have actual EDUCATORS sit on them? Volaris Jul 2012 #72
also with the Romney singing ad Enrique Jul 2012 #10
that ad needed a voice over reading the text. it loses a huge % of the audience who are not looking msongs Jul 2012 #11
in this particular ad, I disagree magical thyme Jul 2012 #12
You should probably watch God Bless America. MattBaggins Jul 2012 #24
His lousy singing voice kind of helps, anyway, dont you think? whathehell Jul 2012 #14
That is the beauty of the ad rufus dog Jul 2012 #19
I think Romney singing gets people's attention NYC Liberal Jul 2012 #16
Wonder how many people have seen it and thought it was a heartwarming Romney ad until they read it! freshwest Jul 2012 #22
Good question! But I think the (very well done) audio effects NYC Liberal Jul 2012 #34
Um, I think anyone that is 'undecided' about that man is clueless, though. freshwest Jul 2012 #38
+1! They were haunting IMO...that makes people stop and look uponit7771 Jul 2012 #49
+1! uponit7771 Jul 2012 #48
i think you're right barbtries Jul 2012 #66
Intimidation only works if you have power or are likely to have it. bemildred Jul 2012 #13
"If he wasn't the head of it, who was?" young_at_heart Jul 2012 #15
Attacking hypotheticals as if they were absolute accusations, rather than resolving the questions patrice Jul 2012 #17
SUPERB analysis of this, alcibiades_mystery! I think we're all starting to smarten up. calimary Jul 2012 #18
Excellent analysis calimary! tallahasseedem Jul 2012 #39
One Thing Is Different This Time DallasNE Jul 2012 #44
Reading this JustAnotherGen Jul 2012 #51
Brava! Please make this an OP bleever Jul 2012 #53
Done! Thanks bleever! Thank you tallahasseedem too! calimary Jul 2012 #58
Bravo (to you and to Stephanie and the Obama campaign). Somewhere in heaven, coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #21
They will soon tire of appologizing maindawg Jul 2012 #23
Mary learned ambiguities in the 90's orpupilofnature57 Jul 2012 #29
It's time for... SCVDem Jul 2012 #45
Ms. Cutter is one of my favorite people on the campaign. nt TBF Jul 2012 #26
I agree Gothmog Jul 2012 #43
No one gets the best of Ms. Cutter mchill Jul 2012 #65
Maybe Kkkarl will finally get the role he deserves orpupilofnature57 Jul 2012 #27
I think this is one of the first times in my living memory where I have seen the Democrats Douglas Carpenter Jul 2012 #28
Same here Douglas! tallahasseedem Jul 2012 #41
It time to put talking points aside & come out with fighting points.... Historic NY Jul 2012 #63
Very well said malaise Jul 2012 #32
So for those who; greiner3 Jul 2012 #33
It's certainly worked with the DOJ and Florida.. ananda Jul 2012 #36
Rove/Romney Have Put All Of Their Eggs DallasNE Jul 2012 #37
The problem for Romney is that for as long as he allowed his name JDPriestly Jul 2012 #64
I just can't get thrilled YET. turtlerescue1 Jul 2012 #40
I remember this well... tallahasseedem Jul 2012 #42
There is NOTHING for Cutter to apologize for. She was only stating the law Tx4obama Jul 2012 #46
I'm sorry that Mitt signed his name to SEC documents lobodons Jul 2012 #47
very astute analysis arely staircase Jul 2012 #50
Great post. thanks! emulatorloo Jul 2012 #56
Thank you, everyone, for this excellent thread. protect our future Jul 2012 #59
Finally! Xyzse Jul 2012 #60
This is funny....the Pukes put crap out all the time then walk it back... Historic NY Jul 2012 #61
Ohhhh...interesting point! BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2012 #69
Donna Brazile and James Carville. . . Erda Jul 2012 #70
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Jul 2012 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rove-Romney Camp, GOP Lik...»Reply #18