Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you agree or disagree with this general statement about where U.S. foreign policy should go? [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)67. Sigh... very disappointing.
I don't need to scroll up.
I'm glad you've got a good memory. I can understand why you'd decline to view the evidence for yourself.
I wasn't "negging"...I was simply making valid observations about you based on long experience.
Yes, that's "negging" whether you realize it or not.
It's respect to speak honestly about you.
No there's nothing respectful about using the code-word "NASTY" to refer to me. Trump knows what it means. Hillary knows what it means. EVERYONE knows what it means. You can't get away with sneakily calling me a B or a C without me complaining about it. I'm not going to accept that type of sexist behavior from anyone. I deserve an apology (which you'll never do) but I deserve one anyway.
You never do what we should all do and keep the conversation strictly on the issues. I'd LOVE to have that kind of exchange with you. Instead, rather than treating other posters with respect, as all posters here should be treated so long as they don't personally attack or disparage you, you treat people here who disagree with some of your views-mostly just people who are to your left on economic issues, people who aren't in disagreement with you on anything else-as though they have no right to even be posting on this board, as though if you disagree with their ideas, they should simply feel obligated never to mention those ideas here.
That's false accusations and insinuations. None of those things are true.
Besides, it's really not my responsibility to worry about how someone "feels" after their arguments or ideas have been proven wrong or unrealistic or having no place in the real world. The "attack" was on the idea, not the person. I can't be responsible for nurturing hypersensitive people who have a personal attachment to an idea. If someone "feels as though they have no right to post anything on this board" because they lost an argument... then I have to question whether they're mature enough to be here in the first place. Those are the emotions of juveniles, not adults.
Why not just say why you disagree with somebody else's ideas without acting like you are a Democrat and the most of the rest of DU aren't, as though you should be the person who gets to determine which ideas can and cannot be discussed here?
That's false accusations and insinuations. None of those things are true.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you agree or disagree with this general statement about where U.S. foreign policy should go? [View all]
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
OP
It sounded like you were comparing the speech to Pacino's courtroom speech in that movie
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#19
Along those lines, if there are three people on an elevator and one farts.........
George II
Sep 2017
#16
This is a thread about the idea. It doesn't matter what you feel about the person who said it.
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#6
Sounds like populism when you promise to reach out to the world's poor...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#22
I'm support "fair trade"-that is trade deals that guarantee workers in different countries
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#50
That's not a partnership. That's PR or goodwill, it's an apology-tour, but it's not a partnership.
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#23
I gotta laugh at the idea of someone running campaigning on that. And won't oppose
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#30
It's bizarre that none of this has to do with doing things today. Why is their no policy for now?
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#55
I know an Iranian American woman who wants to do business with IRan and other countries
JI7
Sep 2017
#48
Obviously, after "drain the swamp" and "make America great again" we need to question
Warpy
Sep 2017
#49
Are you pretending Dems have no policy positions ? Because that's what this "solely on Trump"
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#56
No, I'm not pretending that(and I AM a Democrat, so please don't imply I'm an outsider)
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#57
The idea of actually listening to and working with the global majority terrifies you, I think.
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#51
We use that language and sentiment anytime we want to screw over another government.
rogue emissary
Sep 2017
#15
OK. A cynic can co-opt any positive concept...we all KNOW that...what's your point here?
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#54
It *is* silly-fluff but it's fun to watch people try to make it MORE important than it actually is
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#60
Perhaps it is time for the United States to seek partnerships with the people of Venezuela...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#65