Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,222 posts)
29. Yeah, no kidding. I'm a retired reporter and the deterioration of the industry of which I was
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jul 2012

Last edited Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:23 PM - Edit history (1)

once so proud just hurts. And I find myself taking it personally. It's a disgrace. The people who are on camera, especially, and on radio and in print these days are for the most part a national disgrace. AND they're complete idiots. They majored in TelePrompTer in college. I remember a forum in which a then-young Jane Pauley defended her being chosen for the co-hosting job on the "Today" show after Barbara Walters went to ABC by saying she WAS, TOO, qualified! She insisted with mild indignance, "I had FOUR YEARS EXPERIENCE IN FRONT OF A TELEPROMPTER!" They'd called her the "Indianapolis Ingenue" when she was tapped for that job. Local pretty young blonde makes good on the national stage. And that was just the beginning.



I remember working in a TV newsroom as a writer/segment producer, and hearing the cute little girl co-anchor, reading aloud from the script as she walked around the newsroom shortly before air, with a quizzical look on her face, noting the slug line at the top of the page: "Scotus. What is that? 'Zat someone's name? Who is Scotus?" Several of us chimed out in unison "Supreme Court Of The United States." But God, she photographed like a million bucks.

That's one of the one-liners my husband and I love to throw around when we're watching TV or cable news: "...but he/she PHOTOGRAPHS well."

To the best of my knowledge, either something is "on the record" or it isn't. no_hypocrisy Jul 2012 #1
I can understand this as a "gentleman's agreement" but as a matter of law Sam1 Jul 2012 #11
if there is a cutting off of access.... tomp Jul 2012 #49
As a former reporter I can tell you. . . Springslips Jul 2012 #25
Welcome to DU Springslips. no_hypocrisy Jul 2012 #35
This field of modern day journalism is simply truedelphi Jul 2012 #42
Thanks Sam1 Jul 2012 #52
You are correct, though ... ificandream Jul 2012 #55
I predict Amy Goodman will have something to say about this Enrique Jul 2012 #2
Sadly, 99.9999% don't know who Amy Goodman is SoCalDem Jul 2012 #3
Unfortunately, you're correct. calimary Jul 2012 #23
you are so right april Jul 2012 #41
When is the last time you read an article and thought russspeakeasy Jul 2012 #4
Probably 30 years ago. emilyg Jul 2012 #8
I trust Greg Palast ... aggiesal Jul 2012 #9
Any time I read Bill Moyers ... or The Nation. TahitiNut Jul 2012 #12
Matt Taibbi nashville_brook Jul 2012 #13
Ari Berman nashville_brook Jul 2012 #14
Michael Hastings nashville_brook Jul 2012 #15
Jane Mayer nashville_brook Jul 2012 #18
The last couple days. Love my local newspaper. (nt) Posteritatis Jul 2012 #27
I trust several. Matt Taibbi, for instance. Marr Jul 2012 #30
when it was dan rather or bill moyers, to name 2. eom ellenfl Jul 2012 #32
I have to say; I am really impressed with the number of people russspeakeasy Jul 2012 #34
Rachel Maddow, Richard Engel, Dan Rather. Rhiannon12866 Jul 2012 #37
kr & fuck them all. HiPointDem Jul 2012 #5
I suspect this is an ultimate victim from the elimination of "The Fairness Doctrine." Uncle Joe Jul 2012 #6
News is what people do not want you to know. KamaAina Jul 2012 #7
nicely put. nt tomp Jul 2012 #50
I hope they handle quote approval on the Newroom. Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 #10
Greenwald comments: Luminous Animal Jul 2012 #16
Mr. Transparency on the campaign trail, and now this. snort! ~nt 99th_Monkey Jul 2012 #36
Tim Russert revealed in his Scooter Libby trial testimony that "off the record" was default.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #17
MSM-financed stenographers AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #19
good definition of most now days!! lunasun Jul 2012 #56
As a former reporter, this phenomenon is really ugly Blue_Tires Jul 2012 #20
Yeah, no kidding. I'm a retired reporter and the deterioration of the industry of which I was calimary Jul 2012 #29
Back country story nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #40
there is no journalism in 'news' reporting. it's gone. dead. spanone Jul 2012 #21
"Quote approval" is not a "new phenomenon." It's been going on for years. Brickbat Jul 2012 #22
As a (potentially) future journalist... davidthegnome Jul 2012 #24
Interesting, experienced take. Echoed on televised "interviews". pinto Jul 2012 #26
That is how propaganda works... liberal N proud Jul 2012 #28
"News is what they don't want you to print, LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jul 2012 #31
And one reason that teachers at most truedelphi Jul 2012 #43
i'm so happy to see Dan Rather returning to center stage. Great reporter. Great human being. JDPriestly Jul 2012 #33
Considering the ownership milieu of the media today...... DeSwiss Jul 2012 #38
Not gonna do it, period nadinbrzezinski Jul 2012 #39
"I don't remember what I said, but I stand by whatever I said." ~ Mitt Romney Major Hogwash Jul 2012 #44
we live in retroactive times nt arely staircase Jul 2012 #45
Access. That is the reason why reporters do it SemperEadem Jul 2012 #46
Grew up with Walter Cronkite mountain grammy Jul 2012 #47
"Faustian" progressoid Jul 2012 #48
All reporters on the campaign bus/plane should stick together and say NO! The candidates need Dustlawyer Jul 2012 #51
Before every netw'k News show: "This broadcast has been approved by federal agencies and candidates" leveymg Jul 2012 #53
Insanity ... ificandream Jul 2012 #54
K&R Hubert Flottz Jul 2012 #57
We used to make fun of the Soviet Union for doing stuff like this. Lars39 Jul 2012 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dan Rather: Quote approva...»Reply #29