Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 3 prominent House Democrats vow to skip Netanyahu speech [View all]Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)3. It is risky
AIPAC is prideful about its influence. Its promotional literature points out that a reception during its annual policy conference, in Washington, will be attended by more members of Congress than almost any other event, except for a joint session of Congress or a State of the Union address. A former AIPAC executive, Steven Rosen, was fond of telling people that he could take out a napkin at any Senate hangout and get signatures of support for one issue or another from scores of senators. AIPAC has more than a hundred thousand members, a network of seventeen regional offices, and a vast pool of donors. The lobby does not raise funds directly. Its members do, and the amount of money they channel to political candidates is difficult to track. But everybody in Congress recognizes its influence in elections, and the effect is evident. In 2011, when the Palestinians announced that they would petition the U.N. for statehood, AIPAC helped persuade four hundred and forty-six members of Congress to co-sponsor resolutions opposing the idea.
During the Gaza conflict, AIPAC has made a priority of sending a message of bipartisan congressional support for all of Israels actions. Pro-Israel resolutions passed by unanimous consent carry weight, but not nearly so much as military funding. During the fighting, Israel has relied on the Iron Dome system, a U.S.-funded missile defense that has largely neutralized Hamass rockets. Although the U.S. was scheduled to deliver $351 million for the system starting in October, AIPAC wanted more money right away. On July 22nd, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel had sent a letter to Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader, seeking an immediate payment of $225 million.
In the conference room, the senators sat on one side of a long table, the Jewish leaders on the other. Robert Cohen, the president of AIPAC, justified Israels assault, agreeing with Netanyahu that Hamas was ultimately responsible for the deaths of its own citizens. At one point, Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia, asked about conservative trends in Israel, a participant recalled. He said that he supports Israel, but hes concerned that Israel is headed toward a one-state solutionand that would be so damaging and dangerous for everyone involved.
Charles Schumer, the senior Democrat from New York, interrupted. Turning to address the room, he said, It troubles me when I hear people equate Israel and Hamas. Thats wrong, thats terrible! Kaine protested, Thats not what I meant! Cohen simply repeated that Hamas was to blame for everything that was happening.
The Senate, preparing for its August recess, hastened to vote on the Iron Dome funding. At first, the appropriation was bundled into an emergency bill that also included money to address the underage refugees flooding across the Mexican border. But, with only a few days left before the break began, that bill got mired in a partisan fight. Reid tried to package Iron Dome with money for fighting wildfires, and then offered it by itself; both efforts failed, stopped largely by budget hawks. If you cant get it done the night before recess, you bemoan the fact that you couldnt get it done, and everybody goes home, a congressional staffer said. Instead, Mitch McConnell, of Kentucky, the Republican leader, decided to stay over, even if it meant missing an event at home. The next morning, with the halls of the Senate all but empty, an unusual session was convened so that McConnell and Reid could try again to pass the bill; Tim Kaine was also there, along with the Republicans John McCain and Lindsey Graham. There were five senators present and literally no one else! the staffer said. They reintroduced it and passed it. This was one of the more amazing feats, for AIPAC.
During the Gaza conflict, AIPAC has made a priority of sending a message of bipartisan congressional support for all of Israels actions. Pro-Israel resolutions passed by unanimous consent carry weight, but not nearly so much as military funding. During the fighting, Israel has relied on the Iron Dome system, a U.S.-funded missile defense that has largely neutralized Hamass rockets. Although the U.S. was scheduled to deliver $351 million for the system starting in October, AIPAC wanted more money right away. On July 22nd, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel had sent a letter to Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader, seeking an immediate payment of $225 million.
In the conference room, the senators sat on one side of a long table, the Jewish leaders on the other. Robert Cohen, the president of AIPAC, justified Israels assault, agreeing with Netanyahu that Hamas was ultimately responsible for the deaths of its own citizens. At one point, Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia, asked about conservative trends in Israel, a participant recalled. He said that he supports Israel, but hes concerned that Israel is headed toward a one-state solutionand that would be so damaging and dangerous for everyone involved.
Charles Schumer, the senior Democrat from New York, interrupted. Turning to address the room, he said, It troubles me when I hear people equate Israel and Hamas. Thats wrong, thats terrible! Kaine protested, Thats not what I meant! Cohen simply repeated that Hamas was to blame for everything that was happening.
The Senate, preparing for its August recess, hastened to vote on the Iron Dome funding. At first, the appropriation was bundled into an emergency bill that also included money to address the underage refugees flooding across the Mexican border. But, with only a few days left before the break began, that bill got mired in a partisan fight. Reid tried to package Iron Dome with money for fighting wildfires, and then offered it by itself; both efforts failed, stopped largely by budget hawks. If you cant get it done the night before recess, you bemoan the fact that you couldnt get it done, and everybody goes home, a congressional staffer said. Instead, Mitch McConnell, of Kentucky, the Republican leader, decided to stay over, even if it meant missing an event at home. The next morning, with the halls of the Senate all but empty, an unusual session was convened so that McConnell and Reid could try again to pass the bill; Tim Kaine was also there, along with the Republicans John McCain and Lindsey Graham. There were five senators present and literally no one else! the staffer said. They reintroduced it and passed it. This was one of the more amazing feats, for AIPAC.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/09/01/friends-israel
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They made it a Republican event by going through the Speaker instead of the President
shawn703
Feb 2015
#11
Only three have ANNOUNCED that they won't attend, dozens of others won't attend either.
George II
Feb 2015
#17
No, I didn't even get into votes for or against aid packages. I'm just talking about....
George II
Feb 2015
#19
A united boycott is the only way to deliver a clear message, foremost to the GOP
mother earth
Feb 2015
#13
TY, George II, a far better way to resolve this GOP defiance and blatant insult, Boehner is an ass
mother earth
Feb 2015
#15
If enough "schedule conflicts" start becoming news, he'll cancel to save face. Boehner has none to
libdem4life
Feb 2015
#16