Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
37. Framing is wrong, it's branding. Aren't these "antivaxer" talking points, too? That word means zip.
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 07:01 PM
Apr 2015
http://file.scirp.org/html/22932.html

Open Journal of Pediatrics, 2012, 2, 228-235

OJPed http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojped.2012.23036
Published Online September 2012 http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ojped/

Vaccination practices among physicians and their children

Michael Martin1, Vahe Badalyan2

1Department of Pediatrics, Inova Fairfax Hospital for Children, Falls Church, USA
2Department of Gastroenterology, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington DC, USA


Received 1 May 2012; revised 3 July 2012; accepted 30 July 2012

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to identify vaccination patterns of both general pediatricians and subspecialists with regards to their own children and projected progeny. A 14 question survey was sent randomly to 1000 members of the Academy of Pediatrics in 2009. Two categories of questions included 1) how physicians with children vaccinated them in the past, and 2) how all respondents would vaccinate a child in 2009. A comparison was made between the answers of general and specialty pediatricians. 582 valid questionnaires were received (58.2% response rate) of which 431 were general pediatricians and 151 sub-specialists. No statistical difference was found between general and specialty pediatricians on how they vaccinated their children up until 2009 (95% vs 93%). When asked about vaccinating a future child, a significant proportion of respondents would deviate from CDC guidelines, specialists more than general pediatricians (21% vs 9%). Generalists were more likely to give a future child Hepatitis A (OR: 3.6; 95% CI 1.3 - 10.4), Rotavirus (OR: 2.2; 95% CI 1.1 - 4.4), Meningococcal (OR: 9.9; 95% CI 3.3 - 29.9), and influenza (OR: 5.4; 95% CI 1.1 - 26.7) vaccines. Specialists were more likely to postpone MMR vaccination (OR: 4.4 95% CI 2.3 - 8.6). Safety was listed by both groups as the most common reason for altering the recommended immunization schedule. Until 2009, general pediatricians and pediatric specialists have largely adhered to ACIP recommendations, but due to vaccine safety and other concerns, both groups, albeit a higher percentage of specialists, reported greater numbers willing to diverge from these recommendations.
His defense will be that it isn't him, it is his guests, but that really doesn't cut it as far as I still_one Apr 2015 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Arugula Latte Apr 2015 #26
Framing is wrong, it's branding. Aren't these "antivaxer" talking points, too? That word means zip. proverbialwisdom Apr 2015 #37
Transparency in science is essential, is it not? proverbialwisdom Apr 2015 #38
Really? Someone's ideas are worthy based on the speaker being willing to debate? alp227 Apr 2015 #43
Lack of transparency is unsustainable in the long term because it is scientifically indefensible. proverbialwisdom Apr 2015 #48
There's transparency, then there's special pleading for transparency, alp227 Apr 2015 #49
it's terrible when a doc is knowledgeable about food/nutrition/supplements wordpix Apr 2015 #2
Yeah. My husband was told he could eat anything he wanted after he had his stent put in and was 1monster Apr 2015 #3
Good nutrition is good Fred Friendlier Apr 2015 #4
You wanna know how many of those supplements work? jeff47 Apr 2015 #19
Not true. MH1 Apr 2015 #31
Yes true. jeff47 Apr 2015 #42
He's probably a good cardiac surgeon, but his TV show pushes quackery. Arugula Latte Apr 2015 #27
When my husband was diagnosed with diabetes arikara Apr 2015 #45
Go Dr. Oz, Why Not Go After That CNN Anchor 'Dr' Sanjay Gupta? Corey_Baker08 Apr 2015 #5
Why the "Dr" in referring to Sanjay Gupta? COLGATE4 Apr 2015 #6
Well Is He A Practicing Physician? Does He Still Work At A Hospital Or Private Practice? Corey_Baker08 Apr 2015 #7
yes he does drray23 Apr 2015 #9
Doesn't matter if you're actively practicing. You're STILL a doctor. mainer Apr 2015 #13
I understand he does still operate. I don't know with what frequency. COLGATE4 Apr 2015 #35
And also reminds them that they should look at Garcinia Cambogia Extract. It's a game changer. jtuck004 Apr 2015 #8
Good for him BuddhaGirl Apr 2015 #10
If what Dr. Oz promotes on TV is "different points of view regarding health", alp227 Apr 2015 #44
His license should be revoked for moral turpitude. cosmicone Apr 2015 #11
how much damage has been done by "concensus-based standard of care"? grasswire Apr 2015 #12
How much damage will be done by the low-carb high-fat era? jeff47 Apr 2015 #14
with all due respect... grasswire Apr 2015 #32
:facepalm: jeff47 Apr 2015 #47
Consensus-based medical care has led us down all sorts of blind alleys mainer Apr 2015 #16
Yes, much better to abandon all medicine and just go with what feels right. jeff47 Apr 2015 #17
My point is that NOTHING is set in stone. And MDs (I'm one) should always doubt. mainer Apr 2015 #20
And that also includes not blindly accepting claims about miracle cures. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2015 #21
Did I say we should accept miracle claims? mainer Apr 2015 #22
Your point is consensus-based medicine is bad. jeff47 Apr 2015 #23
NO. My point is consensus-based medicine is SOMETIMES WRONG mainer Apr 2015 #25
Here's the point: Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #30
There is a path for "miracle cures" to become scientific cosmicone Apr 2015 #34
There is a huge scientific and moral difference skepticscott Apr 2015 #29
I could tell you several supplements that could prevent your... grasswire Apr 2015 #33
What do you think of Semmelweis? Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #24
Poor Semmelweis. Died in an insane asylum mainer Apr 2015 #28
I love that movie Major Nikon Apr 2015 #36
But its totally fine to push questionable and dangerous pills arikara Apr 2015 #46
Study: Dr. Oz is full of shit. jeff47 Apr 2015 #15
John Oliver totally tore apart Dr. Oz and the supplement industry: Initech Apr 2015 #40
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2015 #18
Oh really? Nobody knows? shenmue Apr 2015 #39
quack quack LiberalFighter Apr 2015 #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dr. Oz fires back against...»Reply #37