Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Dr. Oz fires back against critics calling for his exit from Columbia University, promising to addres [View all]alp227
(32,062 posts)43. Really? Someone's ideas are worthy based on the speaker being willing to debate?
Sorry, what Thompson is saying is a "release the data" canard.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dr. Oz fires back against critics calling for his exit from Columbia University, promising to addres [View all]
LiberalElite
Apr 2015
OP
His defense will be that it isn't him, it is his guests, but that really doesn't cut it as far as I
still_one
Apr 2015
#1
Framing is wrong, it's branding. Aren't these "antivaxer" talking points, too? That word means zip.
proverbialwisdom
Apr 2015
#37
Really? Someone's ideas are worthy based on the speaker being willing to debate?
alp227
Apr 2015
#43
Lack of transparency is unsustainable in the long term because it is scientifically indefensible.
proverbialwisdom
Apr 2015
#48
Yeah. My husband was told he could eat anything he wanted after he had his stent put in and was
1monster
Apr 2015
#3
Well Is He A Practicing Physician? Does He Still Work At A Hospital Or Private Practice?
Corey_Baker08
Apr 2015
#7
And also reminds them that they should look at Garcinia Cambogia Extract. It's a game changer.
jtuck004
Apr 2015
#8
My point is that NOTHING is set in stone. And MDs (I'm one) should always doubt.
mainer
Apr 2015
#20