Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Issue 1, the redistricting one is going to win. Issue 2 is close, but still winning so far. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #1
Forget the Pot bill (it was terrible IIRC) Gerrymandering gone OregonLiburl Nov 2015 #2
Keep in mind though that this doesn't directly affect congressional districts NobodyHere Nov 2015 #6
I thought issue 2 was the Marijuana monopoly referendum? blackspade Nov 2015 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author NobodyHere Nov 2015 #5
2 was no initiatives for personal gain, 3 was monopoly pot. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #7
#2 Prohibit Market Monopolies ; #3 Legalize Recreational Marijuana kristopher Nov 2015 #27
Thanks, our local news apparently had them mixed up. blackspade Nov 2015 #29
Do you think limiting the number of growers had anything to do with its defeat? nt dflprincess Nov 2015 #4
It's why I voted against it. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #8
I think that is the primary reason for the defeat Bjorn Against Nov 2015 #9
It will be interesting to hear if the media mentions the reason for the defeat dflprincess Nov 2015 #12
Who is going to pay to gather 300,000 signatures? Comrade Grumpy Nov 2015 #54
Perhaps Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #10
Yes, it's so easy to displace monopolies after they're established. jeff47 Nov 2015 #16
The bill allowed additional growers after 4 years Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #18
Giving the monopolies a 4 year head start means they can not be easily displaced jeff47 Nov 2015 #21
thats fine Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #23
Did you seriously need me to add the sarcasm tag to this? jeff47 Nov 2015 #24
Well, Ohio activists haven't manged to actually get an initiative on theballot. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2015 #53
People are not going to change one bad policy for another. nt TeamPooka Nov 2015 #15
That would not go over well in Ohio. yardwork Nov 2015 #48
Wow, surprising. Agschmid Nov 2015 #11
It was one word that killed issue 3 liberal N proud Nov 2015 #13
Yep... wysi Nov 2015 #14
I see social justice goes out the window because somebody might make a $ mathematic Nov 2015 #17
The way I see it, we need about 20 million to put pot on next years ballot Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #20
Pft. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #40
Completely agree with you. LuvLoogie Nov 2015 #51
Michiganders! We need to step up and legalize ASAP FrodosPet Nov 2015 #19
I'm in! Let them keep Cedar Point! But wait ... JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2015 #49
GOOD...They Need To Be Put Down For Trying To Monopolize...Greedy Bastards! billhicks76 Nov 2015 #22
I actually had this conversation with someone in the grocers today. Gregorian Nov 2015 #25
I Live In Oregon billhicks76 Nov 2015 #26
It's a huge market. The greedy are bound to come running. Gregorian Nov 2015 #55
How does a monopoly initiative moondust Nov 2015 #28
Was Monopoly Really The Reason For Most Who Voted Against It? NonMetro Nov 2015 #30
Well even in Colorado and Oregon it passed by about 55-45 NobodyHere Nov 2015 #32
I Can See That, But Oligopolies Already Control Most Commodities In This Country. NonMetro Nov 2015 #52
Yes, that's the reason I came across most often Bradical79 Nov 2015 #56
Monopoly Or Not colsohlibgal Nov 2015 #31
From the interviews I saw it seems the monopoly issue killed it. oldandhappy Nov 2015 #33
You're correct. nt No Vested Interest Nov 2015 #38
It looks like WA will continue to tax medical marijuana patients. liberal_at_heart Nov 2015 #34
If not for the "monopolies," who would have put up the money to make this a viable issue? Hoyt Nov 2015 #35
How much money did you need? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #41
We are talking Ohio here. First you need the money to get it on the ballot. Second, you need the Hoyt Nov 2015 #43
Every person with a grow light who wants to SHOULD be producing. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #44
I agree. Not sure they should be selling in shops though, sorry. Alas, it didn't pass. Hoyt Nov 2015 #45
I think we might. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #46
Well, the vote was not even close. And I don't think it was because of "monopolies." n/t Hoyt Nov 2015 #47
I would advise states to be careful of approving just any bill. WA did and we are paying for it. liberal_at_heart Nov 2015 #36
Here in Colorado the grows are toxic SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2015 #37
So take some of those millions in taxes, and pay for some inspections. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #42
Take God's gift to mankind and pour poison on it? Elmer S. E. Dump Nov 2015 #50
Good deal. It wasn't the right bill. Not to worry, I suspect it will come back again. nt silvershadow Nov 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»AP: Ohio rejects Issue 3 ...»Reply #38