Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
18. This was discussed last week.. From a New York Times article
Mon Dec 28, 2015, 06:52 PM
Dec 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141293684

Here is the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) actual listing for African Lions:

https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2015-31958.pdf

From that listing, as to Southern Africa Lions (P. l. melanochaita):

Management programs for P. l. melanochaita would be expected to address, but are not limited to, evaluating population levels and trends; the biological needs of the species; quotas; management practices; legal protection; local community involvement; and use of hunting fees for conservation. In evaluating these factors, we will work closely with the range countries and interested parties to obtain the information. By allowing entry into the United States of P. l. melanochaita trophies from range countries that have science-based management programs, we anticipate that other range countries would be encouraged to adopt and financially support the sustainable management of lions that benefits both the species and local communities. In addition to addressing the biological needs of the subspecies, a scientifically based management program would provide economic incentives for local communities to protect and expand P. l. melanochaita habitat.

As stated, under this 4(d) rule any person wishing to conduct an otherwise prohibited activity, including all imports of P. l. melanochaita specimens, must first obtain a permit under 50 CFR 17.32. As with all permit applications submitted under 50 CFR 17.32, the individual requesting authorization to import a sport-hunted trophy of P. l. melanochaita bears the burden of providing information in their application showing that the activity meets the requirements for issuance criteria under 50 CFR 17.32. In some cases for imports, such as sport-hunted trophies, it is not always possible for the applicant to provide all of the necessary information needed by the Service to make a positive determination under the Act to authorize the activity. For the import of sport-hunted trophies of P. l. melanochaita, the Service will typically consult with the range country to the extent practicable and other interested parties to obtain necessary information. The Service has the discretion to make the required findings on sport-hunted trophy imports of P. l. melanochaita on a country-wide basis, although individual import permits will be evaluated and issued or denied for each applicant. While the Service may make enhancement findings for sport-hunted trophy imports of P. l. melanochaita on a country-wide basis, the Service encourages the submission of information from individual applicants. We would rely on the information available to the Service and may rely on information from sources other than the applicant when making a permitting decision.



The difference is important, see 50 CFR § 17.32:

§ 17.32 Permits—general.
Upon receipt of a complete application the Director may issue a permit for any activity otherwise prohibited with regard to threatened wildlife.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/50/17.32


Now the regulations go on and mention "scientific purposes, or the enhancement of propagation or survival, or economic hardship, or zoological exhibition, or educational purposes, or special purposes consistent with the purposes of the Act." but that is vague enough for any hunter to get a permit to import an "Threatened Species" except those under special rules 17.40 through 17.48 (Which includes the "Special Rules" for Elephants, Grizzly bears and some other "Threatened" Species but NOT lions).

Special Rules 50 CFR § 17.40:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/50/17.40
About damn time. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2015 #1
+10000 trillion Dec 2015 #21
Actually Should Ban Importation Of ALL Trophy Animals Except For Scientific Or Conservation. TheMastersNemesis Dec 2015 #2
Killing for recreation is an abomination. EOM navarth Dec 2015 #3
I'd be happy dressing up in a bullet proof Lion suit. I could take my trophy heads home and... BlueJazz Dec 2015 #4
Even as a little kid, I understood and respected the idea of "shooting" Aristus Dec 2015 #5
700 lions at $20,000, that's $14M not going to Africa JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2015 #6
hunting companies contribute only 3 percent of their revenue to communities living in hunting areas LanternWaste Dec 2015 #12
Yet nations that allow controlled hunting have the largest lion populations left in Africa NickB79 Dec 2015 #13
Interesting editorial. LanternWaste Dec 2015 #14
The original study was peer-reviewed and published in PNAS this year NickB79 Dec 2015 #15
I'm South African FarrenH Dec 2015 #16
Many of those people will still go to Africa, wickerwoman Dec 2015 #17
Greatest fear of all for these freaks is any law making it harder to harm or destroy others. Judi Lynn Dec 2015 #7
Lion "trophies?" farleftlib Dec 2015 #8
+1 SunSeeker Dec 2015 #9
They have gone irredeemably sick, deteriorated inside. Wildly sub-human. Judi Lynn Dec 2015 #10
LION HUNTING INDUSTRY??!? Herman4747 Dec 2015 #11
This was discussed last week.. From a New York Times article happyslug Dec 2015 #18
Breeders will produce thousands more to meet the the 'bred in captivity' exception. Sunlei Dec 2015 #19
The irony of it is that this will probably hurt conservation efforts Taitertots Dec 2015 #20
There are always unintended consequences when decisions like this are made Calista241 Dec 2015 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»South Africa's lion hunti...»Reply #18