Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,124 posts)
46. "Jarqui, you actually don't know." I think we've got a darn good indication
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 04:10 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie has been running for office since the early 70s - often against two opponents (Dems and GOP). Forty plus years of that and many elections is one heck of a lot of scrutiny.

I'm sure the GOP will pull dirty tricks. They could float Hillary had sex with a gorilla or Bernie had sex with a goat. In others words, BOTH candidates are equally exposed to the potential of their dirty tricks.

The difference is Hillary has a deep library of scandals, lies, deceptions & flip-flops and is exposed to innuendo of quid pro quo with the Clinton Foundation or the email scandal, etc. Bernie doesn't have much of that crap in his background. And the problem with that type of crap is they can join real dots of evidence to trick folks into believing it far more than those who would fall for the pure wild allegation without any evidence like the gorilla/goat nonsense above.

The GOP can milk Hillary's email scandal all the way to the election - that 8-10 weeks of testimony coming up starting around mid July. The Benghazi report is coming out. The FBI and two Inspector General reports are likely before the convention. They can milk the Clinton Foundation stuff all the way to the election and there are troubling facts there that led to a subpoena ... so folks are much more prone to fall for it. they also can remind folks of all the prior scandals like Whitewater (Judicial Watch got some new stuff on that recently) or Travelgate or Cattlegate, etc. They've been researching Hillary for about 18 months on top of the research they had on Bill's years in the White House and Hillary in 2008. There is probably some stuff that will come out once she's nominated - far more likely of it happening than Bernie because they've been gunning for her for so long.

Again, Bernie doesn't have any scandals going on in his life and no major juicy scandals like that in his past. He's an honest guy not worth much money whose ex-wife still likes him and has few lies, flip-flops, deceptions or scandals in his past. It's not that the GOP won't try. They'll do their best to smear him just like they would Hillary. But he's very likely to have less trouble because he's starting out with so much less trouble from his past.

I thought this was over? tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #1
We could simply nominate Bernie Sanders. His integrity, honesty, and candor vs her baggage. peacebird Mar 2016 #2
Math says there is NO Path to Victory for Bern. Cryptoad Mar 2016 #9
Actually MATH says there is a path to pledged delegate victory for Bernie. We are in this fight peacebird Mar 2016 #10
Sanders will stay in but there is no viable path for victory. NONE riversedge Mar 2016 #30
Except, of course, if your immoral beloved, Herman4747 Mar 2016 #42
You really need to stop this nonsense. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #19
Just the facts Cryptoad Mar 2016 #25
These are the facts: Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #27
math says even the number on ur graph are incorrect. Cryptoad Mar 2016 #31
Your post lacks substance. Just the usual soundbites. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #33
Numbers say it aint going to happen. Cryptoad Mar 2016 #40
Show me your links. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #49
I can count without a "link" Cryptoad Mar 2016 #53
Just what I thought. No real substance to your opinion. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #54
Judicial Watch doesn't dictate my vote, thanks. Codeine Mar 2016 #11
What's In A Name? cynzke Mar 2016 #24
I Agree w/ Peacebird. Myrina Mar 2016 #15
... peacebird Mar 2016 #16
Perhaps you're prepared to leftynyc Mar 2016 #18
Bernie didn't set up a private server NWCorona Mar 2016 #20
LOL leftynyc Mar 2016 #21
Did you read my reply NWCorona Mar 2016 #23
Hillary Can Get Things Done LeFleur1 Mar 2016 #39
Some complain that Obama shouldn't let Republicans pick his justice Democat Mar 2016 #28
Exactly. NO BAGGAGE WHATSOEVER WITH BERNIE. Herman4747 Mar 2016 #41
Right-wing Republican poli-psychopaths seek to undermine US elections AxionExcel Mar 2016 #3
Exactly. This is just like Whitewater. Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #4
Yes, just like Whitewater. Nitram Mar 2016 #43
Which tied up the Clinton administration for 3 years. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #47
I don't get it. Tying up Clinton for 3 tears was a good thing? Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #48
Oh, my god. Nobody said this was a good thing. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #50
I get it. You think she is going to be Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #52
Nooooo. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #55
Okay. Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #56
Judicial Watch was founded and is run by a man named Larry Klayman. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #5
Note that the courts haven't agreed all of the lawsuits were "frivolous".... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #26
Klayman's sole purpose has been to use the court system to smear democrats for decades. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #29
I'm not a Klayman supporter. I'm just pointing out that you can't dismiss all the legal action PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #32
You support Klayman's INTENT which is to destroy any Democrat in positions of power. Congratulations Trust Buster Mar 2016 #34
Pointing out that Klayman has had some success in the courts is no more "supporting" him... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #35
Klayman (and the Sierra Club) sued Cheney over his secret NEPDG meetings. OnyxCollie Mar 2016 #38
Bernie fans cheering on Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #6
I do not see anybody cheering this on Jarqui Mar 2016 #13
yeah, and nothing like this would happen to Bernie Sanders nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #14
I think to a degree it would. I can't imagine the GOP operating any other way. Jarqui Mar 2016 #17
Jarqui, you actually don't know. Nitram Mar 2016 #44
"Jarqui, you actually don't know." I think we've got a darn good indication Jarqui Mar 2016 #46
Larry Klayman is no longer with Judicial Watch. Archae Mar 2016 #36
eh, same shit different pile nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #37
Translation: RW group wants Donald Trump to be president. leftofcool Mar 2016 #7
It's what they do. Codeine Mar 2016 #12
Because it is news. Not good or great news but news just the same. Jarqui Mar 2016 #59
Ohhhh NO,,, EMAILS,,,,, Oh the horror of it all!,,Drink! Cryptoad Mar 2016 #8
She will be win jparke1599 Mar 2016 #22
She will lose. peacebird Mar 2016 #45
"A conservative" vdogg Mar 2016 #51
So by May the media will be in the business of explaining several different investigations Babel_17 Mar 2016 #57
It's always the OOJ that gets them. leveymg Mar 2016 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Legal group submits plan ...»Reply #46