Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,124 posts)
59. Because it is news. Not good or great news but news just the same.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 10:52 PM
Mar 2016

It's been proposed that 7 of Clinton's staff testify in this FOIA case related to the emails. Hillary herself may get called. In this article, it tells us who the plaintiff wants to testify - that is news - particularly when it includes Huma and Cheryl. And this can affect Hillary.

An outfit sympathetic to the right filed this lawsuit - one of 38 active lawsuits for Clinton information. This lawsuit is a little different because it's the one that triggered a whole bunch of this email fiasco and delivered copies of all Hillary's emails that were not deleted or classified. On that basis alone, it probably is not a bad thing to keep an eye on. A right wing sympathetic organization may have started this but the court has accepted the legality of their complaint to the extent the judge wants closer examination. The judge is accepting the plaintiff's legal argument that there potentially has been some stalling. The judge wants to get to the bottom of it with the testimony of people who were close to Clinton or maybe Hillary herself, to sort out why it took two years to get the emails when the FOIA limits are normally far shorter.

The bad news isn't so much the civil suit. In part, it's the timing. Clinton's State Department employees are probably going to be testifying or pleading the 5th during the Democratic convention - which might suck some of the air out of the Democratic convention. And the plaintiff has reserved the right to call Hillary to testify - which is also news because if she has to plead the 5th, her campaign would be in serious trouble. On that basis, I think we should pay attention to this case.

I thought this was over? tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #1
We could simply nominate Bernie Sanders. His integrity, honesty, and candor vs her baggage. peacebird Mar 2016 #2
Math says there is NO Path to Victory for Bern. Cryptoad Mar 2016 #9
Actually MATH says there is a path to pledged delegate victory for Bernie. We are in this fight peacebird Mar 2016 #10
Sanders will stay in but there is no viable path for victory. NONE riversedge Mar 2016 #30
Except, of course, if your immoral beloved, Herman4747 Mar 2016 #42
You really need to stop this nonsense. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #19
Just the facts Cryptoad Mar 2016 #25
These are the facts: Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #27
math says even the number on ur graph are incorrect. Cryptoad Mar 2016 #31
Your post lacks substance. Just the usual soundbites. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #33
Numbers say it aint going to happen. Cryptoad Mar 2016 #40
Show me your links. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #49
I can count without a "link" Cryptoad Mar 2016 #53
Just what I thought. No real substance to your opinion. Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #54
Judicial Watch doesn't dictate my vote, thanks. Codeine Mar 2016 #11
What's In A Name? cynzke Mar 2016 #24
I Agree w/ Peacebird. Myrina Mar 2016 #15
... peacebird Mar 2016 #16
Perhaps you're prepared to leftynyc Mar 2016 #18
Bernie didn't set up a private server NWCorona Mar 2016 #20
LOL leftynyc Mar 2016 #21
Did you read my reply NWCorona Mar 2016 #23
Hillary Can Get Things Done LeFleur1 Mar 2016 #39
Some complain that Obama shouldn't let Republicans pick his justice Democat Mar 2016 #28
Exactly. NO BAGGAGE WHATSOEVER WITH BERNIE. Herman4747 Mar 2016 #41
Right-wing Republican poli-psychopaths seek to undermine US elections AxionExcel Mar 2016 #3
Exactly. This is just like Whitewater. Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #4
Yes, just like Whitewater. Nitram Mar 2016 #43
Which tied up the Clinton administration for 3 years. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #47
I don't get it. Tying up Clinton for 3 tears was a good thing? Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #48
Oh, my god. Nobody said this was a good thing. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #50
I get it. You think she is going to be Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #52
Nooooo. Le Taz Hot Mar 2016 #55
Okay. Kingofalldems Mar 2016 #56
Judicial Watch was founded and is run by a man named Larry Klayman. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #5
Note that the courts haven't agreed all of the lawsuits were "frivolous".... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #26
Klayman's sole purpose has been to use the court system to smear democrats for decades. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #29
I'm not a Klayman supporter. I'm just pointing out that you can't dismiss all the legal action PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #32
You support Klayman's INTENT which is to destroy any Democrat in positions of power. Congratulations Trust Buster Mar 2016 #34
Pointing out that Klayman has had some success in the courts is no more "supporting" him... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #35
Klayman (and the Sierra Club) sued Cheney over his secret NEPDG meetings. OnyxCollie Mar 2016 #38
Bernie fans cheering on Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #6
I do not see anybody cheering this on Jarqui Mar 2016 #13
yeah, and nothing like this would happen to Bernie Sanders nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #14
I think to a degree it would. I can't imagine the GOP operating any other way. Jarqui Mar 2016 #17
Jarqui, you actually don't know. Nitram Mar 2016 #44
"Jarqui, you actually don't know." I think we've got a darn good indication Jarqui Mar 2016 #46
Larry Klayman is no longer with Judicial Watch. Archae Mar 2016 #36
eh, same shit different pile nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #37
Translation: RW group wants Donald Trump to be president. leftofcool Mar 2016 #7
It's what they do. Codeine Mar 2016 #12
Because it is news. Not good or great news but news just the same. Jarqui Mar 2016 #59
Ohhhh NO,,, EMAILS,,,,, Oh the horror of it all!,,Drink! Cryptoad Mar 2016 #8
She will be win jparke1599 Mar 2016 #22
She will lose. peacebird Mar 2016 #45
"A conservative" vdogg Mar 2016 #51
So by May the media will be in the business of explaining several different investigations Babel_17 Mar 2016 #57
It's always the OOJ that gets them. leveymg Mar 2016 #58
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Legal group submits plan ...»Reply #59