Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Italian court rules food theft 'not a crime' if hungry [View all]
Source: BBC
Stealing small amounts of food to stave off hunger is not a crime, Italy's highest court of appeal has ruled.
Judges overturned a theft conviction against Roman Ostriakov after he stole cheese and sausages worth 4.07 (£3; $4.50) from a supermarket.
Mr Ostriakov, a homeless man of Ukrainian background, had taken the food "in the face of the immediate and essential need for nourishment", the court of cassation decided.
Therefore it was not a crime, it said.
~ snip ~
Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36190557?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link
In a humane world, no one would need to take any food without permission. The able bodied would have a job that paid enough that people could survive on their earnings. With enough surplus to take care of the children, the frail, and the elderly.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
76 replies, 5652 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (68)
ReplyReply to this post
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When the play Les Miserable was on Broadway, there was some housing for people with
jtuck004
May 2016
#5
I saw where one of our health oriented actresses had a more affordable recipe for her
braddy
May 2016
#9
There is "moon dust" for one thing (ground up pearls to you peons). here are a couple of links.
braddy
May 2016
#52
It's funny, I could probably never get her to eat a chili dog, yet look at what she will eat.
braddy
May 2016
#55
A strainer? Me too, but that is why we don't get "conspicuous consumption" heck if I became truly
braddy
May 2016
#53
Meanwhile, the US is trying to make giving poor people food or healthcare or education WTO-illegal
Baobab
May 2016
#43
Compassion is fine. He doesnt go to jail. However the store needs to be made whole.
Gomez163
May 2016
#29
the cashless economy is all about that, so that bypassing the system and giving the poor food
Baobab
May 2016
#44
Sure, if somebody steals food from my store I'll just deduct it from everybody's paycheck.
Travis_0004
May 2016
#38
No obviouly its not right if there are a lot of hungry people roaming around taking food(sarcasm
Baobab
May 2016
#45
I don't think that will happen because not far into the future people will need to have good credit
Baobab
May 2016
#46
Had this been America he would have gotten the proper punishment, twenty to life.
Katashi_itto
May 2016
#11
face recognition is extremely good now and everybodys wallet has multiple RFID devices, plus people
Baobab
May 2016
#48
So instead of government taking care of the people, individual shop owners have to?
CrispyQ
May 2016
#17
The court is wrong because it is theft and therefore a crime but its one in general
cstanleytech
May 2016
#20
+1. Food should be a public utility, well run farms with well paid farmers producing what is needed.
bemildred
May 2016
#64
Stealing is wrong, but a system that provides no recourse to the hungry is even worse.
ronnie624
May 2016
#68
We live on a finite planet, but we have what is basically an unlimited imagination
The2ndWheel
May 2016
#71