Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: UnprecedentedAlliance of Scientists,HealthPros,Advocates AgreeToxicChemicals HurtingBrainDevelopment [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)13. 2011: EPA praised use of Toxics Release Inventory data by prominent autism reseacher, meanwhile...
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/tri_in_action_final_report_july_2013.pdf
EPA: THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[CENTER]The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) in Action: Media, Government, Business, Community and Academic Uses of TRI Data[/CENTER]p.8
Zimmerman, J.P., Bakian A., et al. "Maternal Residential Proximity to Toxic Release Inventory Sites In Children with ASD and Other Developmental Disabilities." International Meeting for Autism Research. INSAR: International Society for Autism Research. Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego, CA. 12 May 2011. Lecture
EPA: THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[CENTER]The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) in Action: Media, Government, Business, Community and Academic Uses of TRI Data[/CENTER]p.8
Zimmerman, J.P., Bakian A., et al. "Maternal Residential Proximity to Toxic Release Inventory Sites In Children with ASD and Other Developmental Disabilities." International Meeting for Autism Research. INSAR: International Society for Autism Research. Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego, CA. 12 May 2011. Lecture
http://archive.sltrib.com/story.php?ref=/sltrib/news/51759624-78/autism-utah-disorder-education.html.csp
http://archive.sltrib.com/story.php?ref=/sltrib/news/51759624-78/autism-utah-disorder-education.html.csp
Utah Autism Whistleblower Lawsuit Will Go to Trial After Federal Judge Denies a Majority of Defendants Motions to Dismiss
Mark Blaxill
July 5, 2016
...a Federal District Court Judge for the District of Utah issued a ruling Friday that effectively guarantees a Utah autism whistleblower her day in court. Judge Jill N. Parrish denied a majority of motions by Dr. William McMahon of the University of Utah to dismiss allegations by Dr. Judith Pinborough Zimmerman that McMahon and his colleagues acted improperly in retaliating against her for raising concerns over their research misconduct, violated university policies by terminating her contract without proper review, and impugned her reputation in the process.
<>
Dr. Zimmerman filed her lawsuit against Dr. McMahon nearly two years ago, in a complaint that describes a heated dispute between the two scientists over the proper handling of confidential health and education records as well as the accuracy of the data records used in measuring Utahs autism prevalence as part of the Center for Disease Controls (CDC) autism surveillance project, the Autism and Development Disabilities (ADDM) Network. Since 2002, Zimmerman had been the Director of Utahs ADDM Network site, the Utah Registry of Autism and Developmental Disabilities (URADD). She joined the University of Utah in 2005, bringing the URADD grant with her. She was removed from her URADD and university positions in 2013.
Zimmermans lawsuit alleges that McMahon and colleagues violated federal records privacy restrictions in efforts to carry out lucrative additional research projects; these were privacy restrictions that she had carefully negotiated with the Utah Departments of Health and Education in order to bring URADD into compliance with federal law and protect autism families from unwanted use of their personal and family information. When Zimmerman expressed her concerns over privacy and data quality issues to University authorities, McMahon summarily fired her, locked her out of her office and placed himself in charge of URADD. Since Zimmermans dismissal, McMahon has become the PI of the URADD and watches over Utahs contributions to the CDCs ADDM reports.
<>
Zimmermans conflict with McMahon may have deeper roots than the privacy and data integrity claims cited in Zimmermans lawsuit. McMahon has been an active contributor to genetic studies of autism causation and participated as a co-author in dozens of such publications. Zimmerman, by contrast, led a study investigating Maternal Residential Proximity to Toxic Release Inventory Sites in children with autism. After speaking to a reporter at the Salt Lake Tribune about the study, she was reprimanded by McMahon. CDC has long been reluctant to investigate environmental causes of autism and McMahons interest in genetic research may well have made it easier for him to replace Zimmerman as the CDCs Utah PI.
With a date as of yet undetermined, Zimmerman will have a chance to defend her career and reputation in front of a jury. Judge Parrishs decision directly denied McMahon and the Universitys request to dismiss Zimmermans allegations in 7 out of 12 causes of action in her complaint. McMahon and the University succeeded in dismissing 3 of the 12 causes; the remaining two were certified to the Utah Supreme Court, with Parrish asking for guidance in the absence of controlling Utah law.
Mark Blaxill
July 5, 2016
...a Federal District Court Judge for the District of Utah issued a ruling Friday that effectively guarantees a Utah autism whistleblower her day in court. Judge Jill N. Parrish denied a majority of motions by Dr. William McMahon of the University of Utah to dismiss allegations by Dr. Judith Pinborough Zimmerman that McMahon and his colleagues acted improperly in retaliating against her for raising concerns over their research misconduct, violated university policies by terminating her contract without proper review, and impugned her reputation in the process.
<>
Dr. Zimmerman filed her lawsuit against Dr. McMahon nearly two years ago, in a complaint that describes a heated dispute between the two scientists over the proper handling of confidential health and education records as well as the accuracy of the data records used in measuring Utahs autism prevalence as part of the Center for Disease Controls (CDC) autism surveillance project, the Autism and Development Disabilities (ADDM) Network. Since 2002, Zimmerman had been the Director of Utahs ADDM Network site, the Utah Registry of Autism and Developmental Disabilities (URADD). She joined the University of Utah in 2005, bringing the URADD grant with her. She was removed from her URADD and university positions in 2013.
Zimmermans lawsuit alleges that McMahon and colleagues violated federal records privacy restrictions in efforts to carry out lucrative additional research projects; these were privacy restrictions that she had carefully negotiated with the Utah Departments of Health and Education in order to bring URADD into compliance with federal law and protect autism families from unwanted use of their personal and family information. When Zimmerman expressed her concerns over privacy and data quality issues to University authorities, McMahon summarily fired her, locked her out of her office and placed himself in charge of URADD. Since Zimmermans dismissal, McMahon has become the PI of the URADD and watches over Utahs contributions to the CDCs ADDM reports.
<>
Zimmermans conflict with McMahon may have deeper roots than the privacy and data integrity claims cited in Zimmermans lawsuit. McMahon has been an active contributor to genetic studies of autism causation and participated as a co-author in dozens of such publications. Zimmerman, by contrast, led a study investigating Maternal Residential Proximity to Toxic Release Inventory Sites in children with autism. After speaking to a reporter at the Salt Lake Tribune about the study, she was reprimanded by McMahon. CDC has long been reluctant to investigate environmental causes of autism and McMahons interest in genetic research may well have made it easier for him to replace Zimmerman as the CDCs Utah PI.
With a date as of yet undetermined, Zimmerman will have a chance to defend her career and reputation in front of a jury. Judge Parrishs decision directly denied McMahon and the Universitys request to dismiss Zimmermans allegations in 7 out of 12 causes of action in her complaint. McMahon and the University succeeded in dismissing 3 of the 12 causes; the remaining two were certified to the Utah Supreme Court, with Parrish asking for guidance in the absence of controlling Utah law.
No MSM coverage I can find yet.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
UnprecedentedAlliance of Scientists,HealthPros,Advocates AgreeToxicChemicals HurtingBrainDevelopment [View all]
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
OP
"Calling for further study is no longer a sufficient response to this threat."
SoLeftIAmRight
Jul 2016
#8
2011: EPA praised use of Toxics Release Inventory data by prominent autism reseacher, meanwhile...
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#13
No citation I can find except IMFAR & EPA. NOTHING about the case in MSM...maybe not to bias a jury?
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#14
Does this mean the people who knowingly pedal these chemicals will have their ill gotten...
Taitertots
Jul 2016
#16
My apologies, but the explicit rule for OP in LBN is to reproduce the title exactly. Funny that.
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#18
Here's the NIH.GOV press release, also in post #4, but I did not see that first.
proverbialwisdom
Jul 2016
#20