Latest Breaking News

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)

51. He said nothing that the president said or she said herself

Reply to pnwmom (Reply #32)

Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:12 PM

Jul 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton says she relied on State aides for classification decisions [View all] tk2kewl Jul 2016 OP

Instead of "the buck stops here" Travis_0004 Jul 2016 #1

I think she was referring to emails that were forwarded or sent to her lapucelle Jul 2016 #6

Right. If Intelligence had succeeded, then hundreds of people in and out of State pnwmom Jul 2016 #8

"if Intelligence had succeeded" lapucelle Jul 2016 #10

I mean if the Department of Intelligence had succeeded in getting pnwmom Jul 2016 #17

Let's be clear about this B U L L S H I T Cosmocat Jul 2016 #59

Classification SusanLarson Jul 2016 #2

1d ... Looks like she was compliant ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2016 #3

Hillary would be compliant if spillage reports were filled out for NWCorona Jul 2016 #34

Right. And this is why the FBI was never going to be able to make any charges stick. pnwmom Jul 2016 #7

Non-IT Executives bucolic_frolic Jul 2016 #4

Well, I'm very much an 'IT' guy, RiverNoord Jul 2016 #11

"I wouldn't have bothered to write anything on the subject if I hadn't seen your post."" bucolic_frolic Jul 2016 #18

Writing posts on a largely public political web site forum RiverNoord Jul 2016 #24

Thanks. I'm glad you did. elleng Jul 2016 #29

LOL, snooper2 Jul 2016 #60

All the different agencies have different standards for what should be classified pnwmom Jul 2016 #5

Um... Hillary Clinton was the spouse of a United States President RiverNoord Jul 2016 #14

So what? Each agency has its OWN standards and practices; and, as I said, pnwmom Jul 2016 #16

The key element of what you just wrote is RiverNoord Jul 2016 #19

State's .gov server was no safer than her private server. We know, for a fact, pnwmom Jul 2016 #20

Huh. I didn't know that. I still don't think I know that. RiverNoord Jul 2016 #22

Hillary was the head of State but the problems with the pathetic non-classified pnwmom Jul 2016 #31

And if you had leadership under a concerned Secretary of State, RiverNoord Jul 2016 #48

The government's .gov systems were not her responsibility, and she wasn't pnwmom Jul 2016 #49

Wait - you just said 'Her system wasn't' (hacked)? RiverNoord Jul 2016 #52

Director Comey himself said that he found no evidence that her system was hacked. pnwmom Jul 2016 #53

Maddow showed what was involved with retaining emails at the State Dept. When an email was Laser102 Jul 2016 #33

He did not want to present a case against her, elleng Jul 2016 #30

There was no case to present against her because she broke no actual law. pnwmom Jul 2016 #32

He said nothing that the president said or she said herself yeoman6987 Jul 2016 #51

He smeared her by saying she was "extremely careless." The President never said that pnwmom Jul 2016 #54

Ok. The president left out extremely and just said careless. yeoman6987 Jul 2016 #55

Where? Link please. n/ pnwmom Jul 2016 #56

Being a newcomer is irrelevant NWCorona Jul 2016 #35

As I said, each agency has different standards and practices, so her previous pnwmom Jul 2016 #37

What does that matter tho? NWCorona Jul 2016 #39

And she would have known the reputation that State had for being pnwmom Jul 2016 #40

The issue is the fact that Hillary wasn't the owning authority on some of the info. NWCorona Jul 2016 #41

I hope you don't have a security clearance because you could lose it by reading this: pnwmom Jul 2016 #42

I'm not gonna argue over, over classification as I agree with you NWCorona Jul 2016 #43

And I think the reason they didn't even try to make charges is because all this supposedly pnwmom Jul 2016 #44

I honestly can't say and certainly can be true NWCorona Jul 2016 #45

If there WAS, don't you think Comey, who has been after her ever since Whitewater, pnwmom Jul 2016 #46

I don't think so as he said there wasn't intent. NWCorona Jul 2016 #47

Exactly. The 'different practices' argument is utterly irrelevant. RiverNoord Jul 2016 #50

Short video here of her words for the interview...... riversedge Jul 2016 #9

All things considered the hosts today repeatedly called hrc a "brazen liar" boomer55 Jul 2016 #12

NPR is no longer the neutral site that it used to be, in case you haven't noticed. n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #21

Then, what should we expect form this? ... Jopin Klobe Jul 2016 #13

There are people who simply have a temperament for RiverNoord Jul 2016 #15

She never sent any classified information? MichMan Jul 2016 #23

There was. former9thward Jul 2016 #25

They use cables instead of email. nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #27

There was a whole separate system, called a SCIF, used to send classified documents. pnwmom Jul 2016 #57

For heaven's sake, give it a rest! Firebrand Gary Jul 2016 #26

Don't you just love it when... Zambero Jul 2016 #28

That is not what she was saying... Evergreen Emerald Jul 2016 #36

I, for one, don't believe that at all. I signed the DU GE thing. This is HRC bullshit. bobthedrummer Jul 2016 #38

Does anyone truly think this is over, despite chanting your mantras? kick n/t bobthedrummer Jul 2016 #58

not me tk2kewl Jul 2016 #61

There's a lot more than just the two of US in the "free world" that are questioning this. bobthedrummer Jul 2016 #62