Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(10,911 posts)
8. Also 56% less net worth (all numbers adjusted for inflation)
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 09:55 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Sat Jan 14, 2017, 03:33 PM - Edit history (9)

selected excerpts...

With a median household income of $40,581, millennials earn 20 percent less than boomers did at the same stage of life, despite being better educated, according to a new analysis of Federal Reserve data by the advocacy group Young Invincibles.

Their home ownership rate is lower, while their student debt is drastically higher.

The analysis of the Fed data shows the extent of the decline. It compared 25 to 34 year-olds in 2013, the most recent year available, to the same age group in 1989 after adjusting for inflation.

The median net worth of millennials is $10,090, 56 percent less than it was for boomers.

This decline has occurred even though younger Americans are increasingly college-educated. The proportion of 25 to 29 year-olds with a college degree has risen to 35.6 percent in 2015 from 23.2 percent in 1990, a report this month by the Brookings Institution noted.

More: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/millennials-falling-behind-boomer-parents-080144745.html


My own perspective is that of an early boomer. I had to go into military service (the Navy) to keep from being drafted into going to Vietnam, though I am not a military kind of guy. Then when I got out and looked for a real civilian job, in 1976- early 1977, the unemployment rate was 7.5%, and I had almost given up. Then we had inflation build from like 7% to 13% over the next few years (with super-high interest rates and housing prices climbing into the stratosphere), followed by a super-recession with the unemployment rate peaking at 10.8% -- even worse than the peak unemployment rate of the Great Recession (10.0%)

Official Unemployment rate https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000


So yeah, we had a quite a few very difficult years. That said, I think today's young have it worse, and I feel bad for them. For one thing, college tuition was much much less for us, and few of my cohorts had a big student loan burden. I think that's a big factor holding down today's young.

Also back then, people with high school or less education could often get a good paying job (especially if white), today that's virtually impossible.

Back then, there were actually career jobs with pensions. Now we have a lot of gigs and mostly self-pensioning via 401k's.

And those bad years were followed by OK years and then the Clinton boom when 22 million net new jobs in 8 years. But since 1999 we've had 2 severe crashes followed by recoveries that barely almost got us back to where we were before.

Millennials face higher Social Security and Medicare taxes (or fewer benefits) thanks to ever declining worker-to-retiree ratios (even if the Republicans don't fuck with it), and will have to deal with global warming in a serious way or perish. I hope to be dead from natural causes before it really gets bad.

And a world with more nuclear weapons states with the means to deliver them long distance. I only have to hope that nothing goes wrong during the next 20, maybe 30 years. Millennials have to hope nothing goes wrong during the next 50-70 years.
1980's-forward GOP plans have been a success then. TeamPooka Jan 2017 #1
So if millenials must work far longer, for less benefits, guillaumeb Jan 2017 #2
This doesn't track with my own personal experience at all. LisaM Jan 2017 #3
Late boomers (I'm in your boat, so I understand), align more w/ millennials. Yo_Mama Jan 2017 #4
Some call us Generation Jones JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #6
Yes, or "Tweeners" LisaM Jan 2017 #7
All non-trustfund kids did that in the 80s that I knew. Yo_Mama Jan 2017 #9
Exactly. I remember running out of money between paychecks, too. LisaM Jan 2017 #13
And most of us who had some savings got hit by the dot com TexasBushwhacker Jan 2017 #35
The only time I had huge income jumps was the 90s LisaM Jan 2017 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #5
Ten years earlier a lot of people were caught up with Vietnam. My draft number was so low Hoyt Jan 2017 #10
Thank you. ITA it's much harder to find a "good" job than it used to be. There have been raccoon Jan 2017 #43
I was borne in the 1960s .... we have nothing in common with the baby boomers etherealtruth Jan 2017 #11
If you are within 1946 to 1964 you are a baby boomer. YOHABLO Jan 2017 #25
So what is a person born in 1967? Doreen Jan 2017 #29
Generation X n/t TexasBushwhacker Jan 2017 #36
It's the Late Boomers that are being compared with Early Millennials muriel_volestrangler Jan 2017 #49
Also 56% less net worth (all numbers adjusted for inflation) progree Jan 2017 #8
Trends in Family Wealth, 1989 to 2013, CBO, August 2016 progree Jan 2017 #12
NET WORTH enid602 Jan 2017 #31
They are comparing the net worth of 25-34 year olds in 2013 to that of 25-34 year olds in 1989 progree Jan 2017 #33
My guess is that for a lot of boomers, that $143K net worth is mostly house n/t TexasBushwhacker Jan 2017 #37
I have mixed feelings madville Jan 2017 #14
what % of time at "work" does the avg millenial spend on cell phones or net surfing on the clock nt msongs Jan 2017 #15
I won't talk about an entire generation JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #17
Texting in meetings hibbing Jan 2017 #20
I want to know what is so interesting JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #21
Sort of like how the older crowd here rushes to DU to post what they're watching on TV TransitJohn Jan 2017 #28
Not really. JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #30
An hour a day? TransitJohn Jan 2017 #32
Yep. An hour a day. JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #39
Not at all alike. Watching TV is another leisure activity, which it has always been possible muriel_volestrangler Jan 2017 #50
Less than the over 60 set, in my experience TransitJohn Jan 2017 #27
Fire them then. As I'll JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #40
I hate to say it but: millennials need to get their ass out and vote progressive. At least vote. YOHABLO Jan 2017 #16
+1 Auggie Jan 2017 #42
There's more middle aged people than young at temp labor jobs FrodosNewPet Jan 2017 #18
I bought my first home when I was 27. When my azmom Jan 2017 #19
Markets are high most places now but JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #23
over saturation of college grads pstokely Jan 2017 #44
And older Xers and Boomers get laid off when they're too highly bettyellen Jan 2017 #22
and they have more bills Skittles Jan 2017 #24
Older boomers like me started work while the New Deal was in effect Warpy Jan 2017 #26
when people wonder why millennial's don't vote DonCoquixote Jan 2017 #34
So they can't vote because JenniferJuniper Jan 2017 #41
boomer politicians don't appeal to them pstokely Jan 2017 #45
How many millennials are in Congress? crazycatlady Jan 2017 #54
Several factors affecting homeownership IronLionZion Jan 2017 #46
That's because dumbass boomer parents vote against Chicago1980 Jan 2017 #47
I graduated college 1983. There were NO good jobs. hollowdweller Jan 2017 #48
Thoughtful post True Dough Jan 2017 #51
I felt your pain. I was there, too. shrike Jan 2017 #52
Sad to me that statistics and analysis can't even be taken Cal Carpenter Jan 2017 #53
I agree, this whole "shit was hard for me too" posts. Calista241 Jan 2017 #55
Millennials definitely have their struggles. Willie Pep Jan 2017 #56
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Millennials earn 20% less...»Reply #8