HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » California Democratic cha... » Reply #121

Response to m-lekktor (Reply #107)

Mon May 22, 2017, 10:43 AM

121. You are wrong

The SCOTUS could not even rule in this case if Nader had not screwed Gore. Here are some facts on this http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/ralph-nader-was-indispens_b_4235065.html

Nader-voters who spurned Democrat Al Gore to vote for Nader ended up swinging both Florida and New Hampshire to Bush in 2000. Charlie Cook, the editor of the Cook Political Report and political analyst for National Journal, called "Florida and New Hampshire" simply "the two states that Mr. Nader handed to the Bush-Cheney ticket," when Cook was writing about "The Next Nader Effect," in The New York Times on 9 March 2004. Cook said, "Mr. Nader, running as the Green Party nominee, cost Al Gore two states, Florida and New Hampshire, either of which would have given the vice president [Gore] a victory in 2000. In Florida, which George W. Bush carried by 537 votes, Mr. Nader received nearly 100,000 votes [nearly 200 times the size of Bush's Florida 'win']. In New Hampshire, which Mr. Bush won by 7,211 votes, Mr. Nader pulled in more than 22,000 [three times the size of Bush's 'win' in that state]." If either of those two states had gone instead to Gore, then Bush would have lost the 2000 election; we would never have had a U.S. President George W. Bush, and so Nader managed to turn not just one but two key toss-up states for candidate Bush, and to become the indispensable person making G.W. Bush the President of the United States -- even more indispensable, and more important to Bush's "electoral success," than were such huge Bush financial contributors as Enron Corporation's chief Ken Lay.

All polling studies that were done, for both the 2000 and the 2004 U.S. Presidential elections, indicated that Nader drained at least 2 to 5 times as many voters from the Democratic candidate as he did from the Republican Bush. (This isn't even considering throw-away Nader voters who would have stayed home and not voted if Nader had not been in the race; they didn't count in these calculations at all.) Nader's 97,488 Florida votes contained vastly more than enough to have overcome the official Jeb Bush / Katherine Harris / count, of a 537-vote Florida "victory" for G.W. Bush. In their 24 April 2006 detailed statistical analysis of the 2000 Florida vote, "Did Ralph Nader Spoil a Gore Presidency?" (available on the internet), Michael C. Herron of Dartmouth and Jeffrey B. Lewis of UCLA stated flatly, "We find that ... Nader was a spoiler for Gore." David Paul Kuhn, CBSNews.com Chief Political Writer, headlined on 27 July 2004, "Nader to Crash Dems Party?" and he wrote: "In 2000, Voter News Service exit polling showed that 47 percent of Nader's Florida supporters would have voted for Gore, and 21 percent for Mr. Bush, easily covering the margin of Gore's loss." Nationwide, Harvard's Barry C. Burden, in his 2001 paper at the American Political Science Association, "Did Ralph Nader Elect George W. Bush?" (also on the internet) presented "Table 3: Self-Reported Effects of Removing Minor Party Candidates," showing that in the VNS exit polls, 47.7% of Nader's voters said they would have voted instead for Gore, 21.9% said they would have voted instead for Bush, and 30.5% said they wouldn't have voted in the Presidential race, if Nader were had not been on the ballot. (This same table also showed that the far tinier nationwide vote for Patrick Buchanan would have split almost evenly between Bush and Gore if Buchanan hadn't been in the race: Buchanan was not a decisive factor in the outcome.) The Florida sub-sample of Nader voters was actually too small to draw such precise figures, but Herron and Lewis concluded that approximately 60% of Florida's Nader voters would have been Gore voters if the 2000 race hadn't included Nader. Clearly, Ralph Nader drew far more votes from Gore than he did from Bush, and on this account alone was an enormous Republican asset in 2000.

The SCOTUS would never had a chance if Nader had not been stupid

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 191 replies Author Time Post
TexasTowelie May 2017 OP
pnwmom May 2017 #1
Plucketeer May 2017 #11
pnwmom May 2017 #12
Hortensis May 2017 #54
Gothmog May 2017 #92
George II May 2017 #13
paleotn May 2017 #16
Plucketeer May 2017 #26
Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2017 #70
pnwmom May 2017 #75
Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2017 #98
ucrdem May 2017 #108
Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2017 #136
ucrdem May 2017 #137
Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2017 #140
ucrdem May 2017 #147
Sen. Walter Sobchak May 2017 #148
Midwestern Democrat May 2017 #110
joeybee12 May 2017 #114
politicaljunkie41910 May 2017 #142
QC May 2017 #38
JTFrog May 2017 #73
Gothmog May 2017 #91
RandySF May 2017 #2
MBS May 2017 #10
brush May 2017 #183
DFW May 2017 #3
Igel May 2017 #14
KPN May 2017 #18
Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #20
RandySF May 2017 #67
Gothmog May 2017 #93
m-lekktor May 2017 #107
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply You are wrong
Gothmog May 2017 #121
joeybee12 May 2017 #115
killbotfactory May 2017 #157
murielm99 May 2017 #4
BumRushDaShow May 2017 #5
KPN May 2017 #27
murielm99 May 2017 #131
GoCubsGo May 2017 #171
R B Garr May 2017 #172
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #102
murielm99 May 2017 #109
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #120
murielm99 May 2017 #132
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #135
murielm99 May 2017 #138
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #141
R B Garr May 2017 #144
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #145
R B Garr May 2017 #146
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #149
R B Garr May 2017 #150
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #151
R B Garr May 2017 #152
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #154
R B Garr May 2017 #156
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #158
R B Garr May 2017 #159
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #160
R B Garr May 2017 #161
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #162
R B Garr May 2017 #164
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #165
R B Garr May 2017 #166
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #167
R B Garr May 2017 #168
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #169
R B Garr May 2017 #170
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #173
R B Garr May 2017 #174
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #175
R B Garr May 2017 #176
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #177
R B Garr May 2017 #178
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #179
R B Garr May 2017 #181
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #182
R B Garr May 2017 #191
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #180
brush May 2017 #186
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #187
brush May 2017 #188
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #189
brush May 2017 #190
brush May 2017 #184
OrwellwasRight May 2017 #185
dlk May 2017 #6
KPN May 2017 #19
Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #25
R B Garr May 2017 #88
pnwmom May 2017 #94
QC May 2017 #39
KPN May 2017 #118
LiberalLovinLug May 2017 #56
Duppers May 2017 #163
mwooldri May 2017 #23
Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #30
George II May 2017 #7
NurseJackie May 2017 #9
Historic NY May 2017 #8
KPN May 2017 #31
Sunlei May 2017 #15
KPN May 2017 #24
Sunlei May 2017 #28
KPN May 2017 #35
Sunlei May 2017 #41
KPN May 2017 #44
lapucelle May 2017 #103
KPN May 2017 #117
lapucelle May 2017 #123
KPN May 2017 #124
R B Garr May 2017 #80
Sunlei May 2017 #81
paleotn May 2017 #17
kstewart33 May 2017 #21
KPN May 2017 #22
Docreed2003 May 2017 #29
Sunlei May 2017 #47
R B Garr May 2017 #48
Sunlei May 2017 #58
R B Garr May 2017 #59
Honeycombe8 May 2017 #68
geek tragedy May 2017 #32
William769 May 2017 #33
obamanut2012 May 2017 #112
geek tragedy May 2017 #34
KPN May 2017 #36
geek tragedy May 2017 #37
KPN May 2017 #40
R B Garr May 2017 #43
LiberalLovinLug May 2017 #62
Else You Are Mad May 2017 #79
KPN May 2017 #119
LiberalLovinLug May 2017 #128
still_one May 2017 #42
R B Garr May 2017 #45
still_one May 2017 #50
R B Garr May 2017 #60
still_one May 2017 #65
R B Garr May 2017 #71
Hassin Bin Sober May 2017 #72
still_one May 2017 #89
QC May 2017 #74
joeybee12 May 2017 #116
R B Garr May 2017 #46
Post removed May 2017 #49
revmclaren May 2017 #51
Honeycombe8 May 2017 #64
Post removed May 2017 #52
revmclaren May 2017 #53
demosincebirth May 2017 #55
QC May 2017 #76
demosincebirth May 2017 #99
QC May 2017 #100
demosincebirth May 2017 #101
QC May 2017 #105
4139 May 2017 #57
R B Garr May 2017 #61
tammywammy May 2017 #66
Cha May 2017 #82
NurseJackie May 2017 #84
Cha May 2017 #86
Gothmog May 2017 #90
Cha May 2017 #97
NurseJackie May 2017 #111
Gothmog May 2017 #122
still_one May 2017 #106
That Guy 888 May 2017 #63
RandySF May 2017 #69
Cha May 2017 #83
NurseJackie May 2017 #87
Cha May 2017 #96
Gothmog May 2017 #77
tirebiter May 2017 #78
Cha May 2017 #85
Blue_Tires May 2017 #127
Cha May 2017 #130
murielm99 May 2017 #95
liberal N proud May 2017 #104
Blue_Tires May 2017 #113
NurseJackie May 2017 #125
GoCubsGo May 2017 #134
NurseJackie May 2017 #139
nini May 2017 #143
vi5 May 2017 #126
haele May 2017 #129
hrmjustin May 2017 #133
apcalc May 2017 #153
wryter2000 May 2017 #155
Please login to view edit histories.