Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,905 posts)
30. Yeah - he and others made up a whole other category
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 05:43 PM
Jun 2017

of why they can't respond and fortunately, both Congress members and the media are pointing it out. This thing about "not responding in case the President wants to invoke Executive Privilege" is just bullshit.

As Heinrich pointed out - you have the "I'll answer the question" bucket, the "It's Classified, but I'll answer in closed session" bucket, and the "President has invoked Executive Privilege" bucket.... But they can't just make up some other bucket.

And technically, I might add one other option and that's the "I take the 5th" bucket, that any of them could have done.

And IIRC regarding that thing about "DOJ Policy", I think one of his answers attempted to suggest that the policy came from Eric Holder (and Cotton was also using that excuse) - without also indicating that Obama had invoked Executive Privilege (which eventually went to court and the remaining docs being demanded were subsequently submitted), so not a valid claim.

And we'll see if they turn over the policy docs per Sen. Kamala Harris' demand.

Wow. Thanks for this. furtheradu Jun 2017 #1
Wow! Phoenix61 Jun 2017 #2
On this day marking the 71st year for drumpf.... asiliveandbreathe Jun 2017 #3
ha ha. Trumps chocolate cake may a big lump and only one scoop. riversedge Jun 2017 #11
Meaning Beauregard will probably need to testify again BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #4
AND IN FRONT OF AL FRANKEN. a kennedy Jun 2017 #12
Wonder if they'll have to subpoena him ? nocalflea Jun 2017 #17
He'll just claim that Rosenstein "wrote it" and he just signed off on it. BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #23
Yeah, but nocalflea Jun 2017 #26
Yeah - he and others made up a whole other category BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #30
Love that he's scared to death of the optics of pleading the fifth. nocalflea Jun 2017 #32
Expect Flynn to take so many "5ths" BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author nocalflea Jun 2017 #18
I am very surprised. marylandblue Jun 2017 #5
Trumpy isn't going to like this. Ligyron Jun 2017 #6
Happy Birthday Cheeto! We got you another investigation. flibbitygiblets Jun 2017 #7
Yeah! I send my Investigation wishes for 71 yo Newbie! Madam45for2923 Jun 2017 #9
Chuck Grassley?? Well that IS shocking. PearliePoo2 Jun 2017 #8
I trust grassley to direct the committee to an outcome of his liking. be vigilant. riversedge Jun 2017 #10
This Txbluedog Jun 2017 #14
Exactly. A career politican's partisan SMOKESCREEN. n/t slumcamper Jun 2017 #19
yep. Grassley will be working with an outcome in mind rurallib Jun 2017 #28
K & R democrank Jun 2017 #13
Let's whitewash it before Bob Mueller gets up a head of steam bucolic_frolic Jun 2017 #15
That is my take too... NeoGreen Jun 2017 #25
Slappy Birthday to the republican Draft Dodger in Chief Achilleaze Jun 2017 #16
I wonder if WH staff gave the Manchurian Manchild an extra scoop of ice cream with this news Dopers_Greed Jun 2017 #20
GUMP! bora13 Jun 2017 #21
Good start. Remember your oath of office, Senator Grassley. nt Hekate Jun 2017 #22
I don't have ANY faith in ANY member of the GOP to do ANYthing for our country. C Moon Jun 2017 #24
Same here. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2017 #27
After all the senators who testified on the record for JS yesterday, 58Sunliner Jun 2017 #29
Good! nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2017 #31
Interesting because Grassley's been supportive of Trump DeminPennswoods Jun 2017 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate Judiciary Committe...»Reply #30