Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
Fri Jun 30, 2017, 08:00 AM Jun 2017

Federal judge blocks California ban on high-capacity magazines [View all]

Source: The Sacramento Bee

A federal judge has temporarily blocked a voter-approved California law that would have forced gun owners to get rid of high-capacity ammunition magazines by this Saturday.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, who is based in San Diego, issued a preliminary injunction Thursday that found the law was likely unconstitutional because it prevented people from using firearms that employed “whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation.” The law would have barred people from possessing magazines containing more than 10 bullets.

“The State of California’s desire to criminalize simple possession of a firearm magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds is precisely the type of policy choice that the Constitution takes off the table,” the injunction read.

Benitez added that “a final decision will take too long to offer relief, and because the statute will soon visit irrevocable harm on Plaintiffs and all those similarly situated a state-wide preliminary injunction is necessary and justified to maintain the status quo.”

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/news/state/article158965184.html

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation. RKP5637 Jun 2017 #1
Yup, the only use for a 30 bullet clip is mass murder marylandblue Jun 2017 #2
The Gun Lust in the US is out of control. I understand people wanting their guns and all, I have RKP5637 Jun 2017 #3
I suspect it's not going to matter Calista241 Jun 2017 #6
The zombie apocalypse could be any day now IronLionZion Jun 2017 #8
I have 25 of them hack89 Jun 2017 #24
Question? atreides1 Jul 2017 #27
Some of the competition stages require more than 10 rounds. hack89 Jul 2017 #28
I honestly dont know what else the judge could have done though RK as if he hadnt cstanleytech Jun 2017 #4
Yes, very true. Yep, the problem is the founders had far different firearms, not the kill machines RKP5637 Jun 2017 #5
Even after Cheney shot a hunting buddy the NRA got stronger! BigmanPigman Jun 2017 #16
The stupidity in the US today runs far and wide. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2017 #17
I agree with you but until the constitution is amended to specifically say that cstanleytech Jun 2017 #22
Reasonable restrictions apply to many rights guaranteed by the constitution. AJT Jul 2017 #26
Amending the Amendments? moonseller66 Jun 2017 #7
In case they miss the first 29 times IronLionZion Jun 2017 #10
No need to look up to see where this judge is coming from. Hortensis Jun 2017 #9
The ballot proposition passed by a large margin. SpankMe Jun 2017 #11
People die from all sorts of things. Igel Jun 2017 #12
It's hard for some to grasp that those they don't like also have rights friendly_iconoclast Jun 2017 #19
Did you support "states' rights" when Proposition 8 passed? friendly_iconoclast Jun 2017 #18
I figured that awkward question would go unanswered, and I was right... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2017 #25
Yooge problem number 1: 30 rounds is not a high capacity mag jmowreader Jun 2017 #13
The high-capacity magazine ban would infringe on a gun-owners right to kill as many people Aristus Jun 2017 #14
Magazine bans are security theater designed to impress the uninformed and credulous: friendly_iconoclast Jun 2017 #21
California already bans (since 2000) the sale, purchase, manufacture, or import petronius Jun 2017 #15
Were the owners given compensation for the magazines via a buyback program? NickB79 Jun 2017 #20
No, current owners would/will be required to transfer magazines out of state, hand them petronius Jun 2017 #23
Good, criminalizing possession of magazines is bullshit ansible Jul 2017 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge blocks Cali...