Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

petronius

(26,602 posts)

23. No, current owners would/will be required to transfer magazines out of state, hand them

Reply to NickB79 (Reply #20)

Fri Jun 30, 2017, 07:13 PM

Jun 2017

in to law enforcement, destroy them, or sell them to a dealer. There's no compensation provided in the law, and--given that it's been generally illegal since 2000 to buy, sell, import, or manufacture such magazines--I doubt there's a great desire by dealers to pay decent money for them (seems like they'd be old and a bit of a white elephant, by now)...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge blocks California ban on high-capacity magazines [View all] Calista241 Jun 2017 OP

whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation. RKP5637 Jun 2017 #1

Yup, the only use for a 30 bullet clip is mass murder marylandblue Jun 2017 #2

The Gun Lust in the US is out of control. I understand people wanting their guns and all, I have RKP5637 Jun 2017 #3

I suspect it's not going to matter Calista241 Jun 2017 #6

The zombie apocalypse could be any day now IronLionZion Jun 2017 #8

I have 25 of them hack89 Jun 2017 #24

Question? atreides1 Jul 2017 #27

Some of the competition stages require more than 10 rounds. hack89 Jul 2017 #28

I honestly dont know what else the judge could have done though RK as if he hadnt cstanleytech Jun 2017 #4

Yes, very true. Yep, the problem is the founders had far different firearms, not the kill machines RKP5637 Jun 2017 #5

Even after Cheney shot a hunting buddy the NRA got stronger! BigmanPigman Jun 2017 #16

The stupidity in the US today runs far and wide. n/t RKP5637 Jun 2017 #17

I agree with you but until the constitution is amended to specifically say that cstanleytech Jun 2017 #22

Reasonable restrictions apply to many rights guaranteed by the constitution. AJT Jul 2017 #26

Amending the Amendments? moonseller66 Jun 2017 #7

In case they miss the first 29 times IronLionZion Jun 2017 #10

No need to look up to see where this judge is coming from. Hortensis Jun 2017 #9

The ballot proposition passed by a large margin. SpankMe Jun 2017 #11

People die from all sorts of things. Igel Jun 2017 #12

It's hard for some to grasp that those they don't like also have rights friendly_iconoclast Jun 2017 #19

Did you support "states' rights" when Proposition 8 passed? friendly_iconoclast Jun 2017 #18

I figured that awkward question would go unanswered, and I was right... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2017 #25

Yooge problem number 1: 30 rounds is not a high capacity mag jmowreader Jun 2017 #13

The high-capacity magazine ban would infringe on a gun-owners right to kill as many people Aristus Jun 2017 #14

Magazine bans are security theater designed to impress the uninformed and credulous: friendly_iconoclast Jun 2017 #21

California already bans (since 2000) the sale, purchase, manufacture, or import petronius Jun 2017 #15

Were the owners given compensation for the magazines via a buyback program? NickB79 Jun 2017 #20

No, current owners would/will be required to transfer magazines out of state, hand them petronius Jun 2017 #23

Good, criminalizing possession of magazines is bullshit ansible Jul 2017 #29