Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Zorro

(15,740 posts)
Fri Dec 22, 2017, 09:44 PM Dec 2017

Judge questions whether Gates fundraiser broke gag order [View all]

Source: AP

Former presidential adviser Rick Gates, on house arrest in the federal Russia probe, didn't even have to leave his home this week to provoke the judge handling his case.

In a brief order Friday, U.S. District Judge Amy B. Jackson summoned Gates and his lawyers to court on Dec. 27 to explain why the accused shouldn't be held in contempt for violating her gag order imposed on everyone connected with the case. Jackson wants to know why Gates appeared by video at a fundraiser for his legal defense fund.

Jackson told Gates to explain why "his reported personal participation in the creation of a fundraising video to be shown to journalists and disseminated on social media, in which, according to multiple press accounts, defendant makes reference to 'the cause' and the goal of 'ensuring that our supporters from across the United States hear our message and stand with us,' would not violate this Court's order."

It's the second time Jackson has dealt with unexpected public pronouncements by the first individuals indicted in special counsel Robert Mueller's wide-ranging criminal investigation. Earlier, she was told that Gates' co-defendant Paul Manafort, President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman, had secretly co-authored a glowing commentary article that was published in an English-language newspaper in Ukraine.

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-questions-whether-gates-fundraiser-broke-gag-order-162721143--politics.html

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would the cause be spreading Vlads word? dhol82 Dec 2017 #1
They seem incapable of following the law and simple clear cut orders from the judge. Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #2
They believe the law does not apply to them BumRushDaShow Dec 2017 #4
They are a group of sociopaths and narcissists who believe laws are not for them, Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #5
The word, incorrigible, is pertinent here. Maraya1969 Dec 2017 #3
lock 'em up Botany Dec 2017 #6
Trump was off a bit SCantiGOP Dec 2017 #8
Revoke his bail, throw him in the slammer. George II Dec 2017 #7
I could live with that Angry Dragon Dec 2017 #9
That sounds like an excellent idea Phoenix61 Dec 2017 #10
Rich Folk Justice,,,,,,,,,,, Cryptoad Dec 2017 #12
Yeah, how many times is he going to violate the terms of his house arrest before they revoke it NBachers Dec 2017 #11
The Judge needs to stop being lenient with these criminals and lock them up. OliverQ Dec 2017 #13
1st Amendment MaupitiBlue Dec 2017 #14
So you're fine with not complying with judicial instructions? Zorro Dec 2017 #15
Not fine with the order MaupitiBlue Dec 2017 #16
I understand your point ... I for one don't believe that someone who gets, say ... a DUI ... mr_lebowski Dec 2017 #18
LOL. Sorry, but you don't know what the first amendment means. PSPS Dec 2017 #17
It isn't? MaupitiBlue Dec 2017 #20
Of course it's a First Amendment issue. Yale Law School's Media Freedom and Information Access 24601 Dec 2017 #21
6th Amendment MaupitiBlue Dec 2017 #22
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart n/t mobeau69 Dec 2017 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge questions whether G...