Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court refuses to stop new congressional maps in Pennsylvania [View all]durablend
(7,679 posts)4. Is there another ruling they can be smacked with?
Three in one day sounds better than two.
They're probably calling Putin right now: "Um, we have a problem komrade"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court refuses to stop new congressional maps in Pennsylvania [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Mar 2018
OP
Breaking: Supreme Court, With No Noted Dissent, Refuses to Intervene in Pa Redistricting Case...
DonViejo
Mar 2018
#20
You don't have to apologize! I'm as surprised as you one of the wingnut Supremes didn't try and
DonViejo
Mar 2018
#34
Thank you all for your analyses and opinions. While IANAL (but am somewhat anal)
erronis
Mar 2018
#63
Twitters election experts are saying Dems could gain 3-6+ seats from PA alone in a blue tsunami.
LonePirate
Mar 2018
#18
Supreme Court, With No Noted Dissent, Refuses to Intervene in Pa Redistricting Case
Gothmog
Mar 2018
#22
Turzai: "by adding new requirements for drawing congressional districts".
BumRushDaShow
Mar 2018
#54