Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Tue Mar 5, 2019, 06:31 PM Mar 2019

Uber not criminally liable in 2018 fatal self-driving crash: prosecutors [View all]

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - Arizona prosecutors said on Tuesday that Uber Technologies Inc is not criminally liable in a March 2018 crash in which one of the company’s self-driving cars struck and killed a pedestrian in Tempe.

The Yavapai County Attorney in a letter said there was “no basis” for criminal liability for Uber, but added that the conduct of the back-up driver, Rafael Vasquez, should be referred to the Tempe, Arizona police for additional investigation.

Police said last year that Vasquez was streaming a television show on her phone until about the time of a fatal crash and called the incident “entirely avoidable.” An Uber spokeswoman declined to comment.

The Maricopa County Attorney referred the case last year to another office because of a conflict. In the letter on Tuesday, Yavapai County Attorney Sheila Sullivan Polk said its investigation has concluded that “the collision video, as it displays, likely does not accurately depict the events that occurred.”

-snip-

BUSINESS NEWS MARCH 5, 2019 / 5:05 PM / UPDATED 12 MINUTES AGO
David Shepardson
2 MIN READ


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-uber-crash-autonomous/uber-not-criminally-liable-in-2018-fatal-self-driving-crash-prosecutors-idUSKCN1QM2O8

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bullshit Auggie Mar 2019 #1
The collision video does not accurately depict the events? LisaM Mar 2019 #2
In several articles after the incident, I read that BOTH brake appalachiablue Mar 2019 #3
Why wouldn't the driver check? LisaM Mar 2019 #6
NO idea, she was watching 'The Voice' TV show on her cell ph. appalachiablue Mar 2019 #7
"crossing there on a bike which is normal." Now normal to cross outside of the crosswalk? cstanleytech Mar 2019 #12
Early reports after the accident covered this some- concensus was appalachiablue Mar 2019 #16
I think the crosswalks were far apart. LisaM Mar 2019 #17
Really depends on what the driver was told to do when using the vehicle wouldnt it? After all cstanleytech Mar 2019 #10
The person is there because they are supposed to react if the car malfunctions. Coventina Mar 2019 #11
Yes but isn't it dependent on the training they were given and what they were told to look out for? cstanleytech Mar 2019 #13
If you are being paid to sit behind the wheel of a car you are responsible for what happens Coventina Mar 2019 #14
"Murder." Maybe but doesnt it depend on if they were cstanleytech Mar 2019 #15
So you think her instructions were to sit and watch TV? Coventina Mar 2019 #18
Uber is stupid as hell for attempting this.... groundloop Mar 2019 #4
Hardly surprising not fooled Mar 2019 #5
Right. This was preventable and tragic, Uber is responsible. appalachiablue Mar 2019 #8
Well, they can anticipate further 2naSalit Mar 2019 #9
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Uber not criminally liabl...