Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ripcord

(5,379 posts)

16. Didn't know that was still a go

Reply to miyazaki (Reply #15)

Fri May 17, 2019, 02:19 AM

May 2019

Hopefully it will get the ball rolling and encourage other projects.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. cancels $929 million in California high speed rail funds after appeal rejected [View all] Jose Garcia May 2019 OP

Baby lost CA by 4.5 million votes BeyondGeography May 2019 #1

So Cal will get $929 million Mendocino May 2019 #7

I agree with this move. MyUncle May 2019 #2

Well, the buffoon didn't do it because of logical reasons Perseus May 2019 #3

True, but The Mouth May 2019 #4

I have to agree with you, many people in California feel they have been sold a bill of goods ripcord May 2019 #10

I think the US Treasury is not flush with at140 May 2019 #5

Trump would have done DENVERPOPS May 2019 #13

I'm sure our governor Mr.Bill May 2019 #6

Trump has happy feet,another BILLION he can get hold of to blow on his POS wall.............. Bengus81 May 2019 #8

no high speed rail scam means no $. sorry CA. nt msongs May 2019 #9

Love to hear some FACTS about why it was such a bad project. Sounds like some very questionable Evolve Dammit May 2019 #11

Having lived in SFO for almost a decade, Haggis for Breakfast May 2019 #12

I wish they would follow through on LA to Vegas ripcord May 2019 #14

The new Virgin Trains USA is planning on it. nt miyazaki May 2019 #15

Didn't know that was still a go ripcord May 2019 #16

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. cancels $929 million...»Reply #16