Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
Tue May 28, 2019, 01:15 PM May 2019

Supreme Court Passes Up a Chance to Reconsider Roe [View all]

Source: Mother Jones

Tuesday, the court declined to hear the Indiana case. The per curiam opinion explaining the court's reasoning for the denial didn't reveal the vote breakdown, but the decision was supported by at least one of the court's most conservative members: Clarence Thomas.

Tuesday's decision in favor of Planned Parenthood wasn't rooted in any sort of desire to preserve abortion rights, but rather in procedural issues.

Both Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote separately to say they would have blocked the fetal remains law. "This case implicates 'the right of [a] woman to choose to have an abortion before viability and to obtain it without undue interference from the State,'" Ginsburg wrote, arguing that Indiana's petition should have been denied completely.

Indiana has one more controversial abortion case still pending before the court, involving a state law that would require women to undergo an ultrasound at least 18 hours before receiving an abortion. The 7th Circuit held that the law created an undue burden on a woman's right to have an abortion, without any "known benefits," and blocked its implementation. Indiana appealed to the Supreme Court, which will consider the petition again on Thursday.

Read more: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/05/supreme-court-passes-up-on-a-chance-to-reconsider-roe/?fbclid=IwAR2yCX7UrEsjsEC_gkfhGwxyOfNV9caCOKaxtpXHIMn_fvHm5qKlGlPQPWg



A cynical take is that SCOTUS realizes that a total reversal of Roe at this point would be a disaster for the GOP, and that the conservative wing of the court serves the GOP more than it serves the Constitution.

A Roe reversal at this point would not only deprive the GOP of one of their two favorite wedge and fundraising issues before the 2020 election (the other one being guns)

A more constitutional take is that, since 70% of Americans support Roe, it would create a nightmarish backlash, propelling the abortion issue toward the top of the list of issues influencing people's votes.

Until SCOTUS shows a pattern of refusing to hear state-generated cases, it can't yet be clear to half the public that Roe is, indeed, settled.

Long term, if half the country doesn't stay vigilant, SCOTUS could well be content to chip away at Roe a little at a time, while states unduly burden women legally to the point where a Roe reversal would scarcely be noticed.



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Imams on the SCOTUS are just chipping away... Thomas Hurt May 2019 #1
Roe has withstood significant case tests. ancianita May 2019 #3
Keep your fingers crossed, but I don't trust the christofascists on the court to... Thomas Hurt May 2019 #6
Planned Parenthood v Casey was in 1992. StevieM May 2019 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author ancianita May 2019 #13
LOL, I actually just repeated the same mistake that I pointed out. StevieM May 2019 #16
Thanks. Glad we got that straight. ancianita May 2019 #17
Agree - this is why states don't legislate outright bans. ArizonaLib May 2019 #4
Yup....the ACA and IF Dems hadn't taken the House SS and Medicare would be on the block... Bengus81 May 2019 #7
If it goes to the states DownriverDem May 2019 #10
Yes, RBG in her dissent addressed this law as a potential undue burden ArizonaLib May 2019 #2
The 5 justices are biding their time. Iliyah May 2019 #5
Exactly. I expect that in November 2020 they will agree to hear a case. StevieM May 2019 #12
It will happen. Which is why Democrats must expand the court dalton99a May 2019 #8
And/or set term limits, no more lifetime appointments BigmanPigman May 2019 #20
And always remember,this is from the " Keep Guberment out of your life" crowd... Bengus81 May 2019 #9
Remember, if Trump is reelected he may appoint replacements for Ginsberg or other aging liberals Liberty Belle May 2019 #14
NOT TODAY! is my motto! My point here is that it's important news. Roe's still on the books, y'all. ancianita May 2019 #15
Just as I thought, the SCOTUS won't overturn Roe. John Fante May 2019 #18
Agree with this DeminPennswoods May 2019 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Passes Up a...