Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: THE DETAILS OF TRUMP'S HUSH MONEY PAYMENTS ARE ABOUT TO GO PUBLIC [View all]Kablooie
(18,631 posts)37. Don't we already know all about this?
We may not have had the actual documents but the core information was news months ago.
And the actual docs won't be read by hardly anyone so it's a futile move that won't affect a thing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rachel gave me hope about this tonight. Today I've felt pretty hopeless. Tomorrow, tomorrow...
ancianita
Jul 2019
#2
How can another court -- and what other court could-- stop this judge's ruling. Doesn't make sense.
ancianita
Jul 2019
#6
Brett knows better. Whoever delivers the message wouldn't get past the secretary.
ancianita
Jul 2019
#29
I think that we should not be saying that tRump is "immune" or everything drops off
Doitnow
Jul 2019
#15
We know that. We're thinking together, that's all. And you never know the influence DU has elsewhere
ancianita
Jul 2019
#28
I thought Barr's behind-the-scenes pressure caused this drop, which enraged Pauley. The
ancianita
Jul 2019
#8
And they lost! I want to send this judge a present, a token of my thanks. The more unredacted docs,
ancianita
Jul 2019
#40
Definitely. While scofflaw fakeprez runs his mouth, the Law will ensnare him.
ancianita
Jul 2019
#12
Haha. Yes. I hope so, too. But hey, he was born for this. He'll die trying to do what he's doing now
ancianita
Jul 2019
#16
I have a feeling a court injunction will come from another court stopping this release.
kimbutgar
Jul 2019
#17
Only a higher court can do this. What's a higher federal court to stop this? Name it. When a
ancianita
Jul 2019
#19
We don't know all of them. These redactions must name names, is what I'm thinking. It's a big deal
ancianita
Jul 2019
#25
Yes, you're right. But that has nothing to do with the ammunition this gives the Democratic leaders.
ancianita
Jul 2019
#26
That's how Rachel read it, too. He WAS pissed, regardless of neutral judicial wording.
ancianita
Jul 2019
#33