Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Judge Refuses To Delay Her Order For McGahn To Comply With Congressional Subpoena [View all]
Source: Talking Points Memoerandum
The federal judge in Washington who ordered former White House counsel Don McGahn to comply with a congressional subpoena will not put that ruling on hold while its appealed.
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/don-mcghan-stay-denial-district-court
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
46 replies, 8186 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (131)
ReplyReply to this post
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge Refuses To Delay Her Order For McGahn To Comply With Congressional Subpoena [View all]
Gothmog
Dec 2019
OP
A district court judge has DENIED the Trump administration's request that she pause her McGahn rulin
Gothmog
Dec 2019
#1
Yeah, I think just about everyone on earth wants to hear what this guy has to say.
Ligyron
Dec 2019
#4
Yes he will. He now has a court order to testify and would be in contempt of court.
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#6
his taking the fifth works for me. nothing screams guilty to the American public than someone
TeamPooka
Dec 2019
#9
I believe the judge outlined what was considered executive privilege in her ruling. He has no
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#24
They are not going to ask him questions that would incriminate him. He already refused to do
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#26
They aren't going to ask questions they don't have the answers to. If they ask anything not
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#31
The judge stated in her ruling what executive privilege involves regarding his testimony, but
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#34
I'm looking forward to it. I'm also wondering what documents Lev Parnas is turning over to
vsrazdem
Dec 2019
#36
Judge flays DOJ, calling its arguments 'disingenuous' & 'unacceptable mischaracterization
Gothmog
Dec 2019
#22