Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Cuomo Attacks Supreme Court, but Virus Ruling Is Warning to Governors [View all]BigmanPigman
(51,590 posts)14. I am steaming mad!
This was just on CNN. Harry Litman, attorney, said that this is the new trend of the new SCOTUS for a long time. RBG wouldn't allow SCOTUS to take this up twice before she died they said.
Someone just answered my question on DU about a time frame for balancing the courts and it likely won't happen until at least 2023. That is far too long.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Cuomo Attacks Supreme Court, but Virus Ruling Is Warning to Governors [View all]
ancianita
Nov 2020
OP
Depends. Some churches admit that members can practice their knowledge of the difference
ancianita
Nov 2020
#3
Right? One would think that church leaders would require those, or at least a temperature
ancianita
Nov 2020
#7
He is. But it's a question of whose rights prevail -- those who are religious or everyone else's.
ancianita
Nov 2020
#11
Not a lawyer, I'd agree it's a state decision, but then the plaintiffs claim national standing.
ancianita
Nov 2020
#9
Harry Litman? He's an attorney, not a constitutional lawyer. Anyone can claim to
ancianita
Nov 2020
#15
gerrymandering is not at fault here. A state is going to have the same number of
yellowdogintexas
Nov 2020
#32
I watched some videos of those weddings and I couldn't believe how huge the crowds were
yellowdogintexas
Nov 2020
#33
Agree. According to Justice Roberts, belief numbers aren't as protected as human health numbers.
ancianita
Nov 2020
#16
One is moved to ask how they would rule over actions like those of Amon Bundy, David Koresh,
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2020
#19
God is not going to protect the people the SCOTUS has condemned to death in this decision
RVN VET71
Nov 2020
#21
Or until a big D Dem Congress moves to restructure it -- 13 justices for 13 federal districts.
ancianita
Nov 2020
#26
Nothing like a nice stuffy church as a prelude to a nice stuffy ventilator
bucolic_frolic
Nov 2020
#27