Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Supreme Court dismisses emolument cases against Trump [View all]
Last edited Mon Jan 25, 2021, 12:06 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: CNN newsource
The Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a case concerning whether former President Donald Trump violated provisions of the Constitution that bar a president from profiting from a foreign government.
The court instructed the lower courts to wipe away a previous lower court opinion that went against Trump because he is no longer in office. It leaves unresolved a novel question raised in the case because Trump, unlike other presidents, did not use a blind trust when he assumed the presidency, but instead continued to retain an interest in his businesses and let those businesses to take money from foreign and domestic governments.
snip
At the center of the case was the Constitutions Emoluments Clause, which has faced few judicial interpretations since it was written almost 250 years ago. The clause states that no person holding any office
shall, without the consent of Congress accept gifts or other benefits from foreign states.
The Supreme Courts procedural order not only wipes away two lower court rulings, but it also orders dismissal of the entire dispute leaving for some other time resolution of the many questions Trumps conduct raised about the Emoluments Clause, said Steve Vladeck, a CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law.
Ordinarily, the Court pursues such a step only when the prevailing party moots a case while the appeal is pending as opposed to here, where the disputes became moot because Trumps term ended, he added. Todays orders suggest that the court is increasingly willing to invoke this doctrine to avoid highly charged political disputes, even if the mootness wasnt caused by the parties that won below.
Read more: https://kvia.com/your-voice-your-vote/politics/2021/01/25/supreme-court-dismisses-emolument-cases-against-trump/
So you can't charge him when he was in office and now that he is out of office you still can't charge him?
Joe needs to add more people to the court.