Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,457 posts)
Sat Jun 12, 2021, 06:17 AM Jun 2021

Apple says it didn't know Trump's DOJ was asking for Democrats' data when it complied with subpoena [View all]

Source: CNBC

TECH

Apple says it didn’t know Trump’s DOJ was asking for Democrats’ data when it complied with subpoena

PUBLISHED FRI, JUN 11 20217:38 PM EDT

Steve Kovach
@STEVEKOVACH https://twitter.com/stevekovach

KEY POINTS
-- Apple on Friday said it didn’t know former President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice was subpoenaed data on Democrats when it complied with the request.
-- Apple said it was under a gag order not to disclose the subpoena to the affected parties.
-- Microsoft also acknowledged it received a similar subpoena.


Apple said Friday it didn’t know former President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice was asking for the metadata of Democratic lawmakers when it complied with a subpoena seeking the information. ... Apple’s admission that it complied with the DOJ’s request demonstrates the thorny position tech companies are placed in when forced to balance their customers’ private online activity with legitimate requests from law enforcement. In general, companies like Apple challenge such requests, but in this case a grand jury and federal judge forced Apple to comply and keep it quiet. (1)

The admission follows a Thursday New York Times report that Trump’s DOJ seized at least a dozen records from people close to the House intelligence panel related to news reports on the former president’s contacts with Russia. At the time, the DOJ was looking for records from House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and committee member Eric Swalwell, D-Calif. (2)

Apple said it received a subpoena from a federal grand jury on Feb. 6, 2018. According to Apple, the subpoena requested data that belonged to a seemingly random group of email addresses and phone numbers. Apple said it provided the identifiers it had for some of the requests from the DOJ, but not all of the requests were for Apple customers.

Because of a nondisclosure order signed by a federal magistrate judge, Apple could not notify the people that their data was subpoenaed. The so-called gag order lifted on May 5, which is why Apple only recently alerted the affected users. According to Apple, the subpoena did not provide details on the nature of the investigation. ... Apple spokesperson Fred Sainz said in a statement that the company did not and could not have known who was being targeted by the request. .

{snip}

(1) https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/11/schiff-calls-for-probe-into-trump-doj-seizing-house-democrats-data-.html

(2) https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/10/us/politics/justice-department-leaks-trump-administration.html

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/11/apple-says-it-didnt-know-trumps-doj-was-asking-for-democrats-data.html

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No body knows nothing . . . . Lovie777 Jun 2021 #1
Paging Sergeant Schultz. Sergeant Schultz To The Commandant's Office COL Mustard Jun 2021 #35
A grand jury and a judge signed off on this, that is troubling bucolic_frolic Jun 2021 #2
The easiest way to get the subpoenas gab13by13 Jun 2021 #3
Still, NAME THE JUDGE. mpcamb Jun 2021 #5
That is the scary part, gab13by13 Jun 2021 #6
This! I want to know the name of the judge. bamagal62 Jun 2021 #11
"A Grand Jury would indict a ham sandwich". maxsolomon Jun 2021 #10
if their gonna bribe the eukraine, Maxheader Jun 2021 #4
Good read bucolic_frolic Jun 2021 #8
I'd think with all that loot and high-priced lawyers, their deniability would be more plausible. marble falls Jun 2021 #7
Question for the smart ones here bluestarone Jun 2021 #9
Would also like to know the answer to this. bamagal62 Jun 2021 #12
And they have plenty of money to hire some damn good lawyers. blueinredohio Jun 2021 #14
I get the point but a court subpoena is different than a congressional one Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #29
When Trump accuses others of crimes twodogsbarking Jun 2021 #13
Projection.... Wuddles440 Jun 2021 #19
Not buying the apple's bullcrap onetexan Jun 2021 #15
What I'd like to know seta1950 Jun 2021 #16
Witch hunt? Chainfire Jun 2021 #17
The subpoena was signed by Jocelyn Valentine and authorized by Deborah Robinson dalton99a Jun 2021 #18
Jocelyn Valentine should be arrested. rockfordfile Jun 2021 #28
Say you own a boarding house with 500 rooms. tavernier Jun 2021 #20
You answer the door and they hand you a subpoena telling you to give them the keys. You do. pnwmom Jun 2021 #24
I think I was more concerned tavernier Jun 2021 #31
How do you know no one was? Or who knew about this besides the paralegal pnwmom Jun 2021 #37
The Line Of Defense Here DallasNE Jun 2021 #21
She is a Reagan era appointment and was also the Judge for Manafort and remember, ShazamIam Jun 2021 #22
This is corruption and imo she should resign rockfordfile Jun 2021 #27
Judge for the arraignment of Manafort, trial judge IIRC was a dude named Ellis (nt) Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #30
Yes, Judge Robinson was the presiding Judge, link posted ShazamIam Jun 2021 #33
Seems like some civil lawsuits are called for here, being that these persons' civil rights and data, SWBTATTReg Jun 2021 #23
Everybody using the Oliver North defense. LMFAO sarcasmo Jun 2021 #25
I'm not buying Apple's response rockfordfile Jun 2021 #26
It is totally viable that they were given cryptic identifiers to start Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #34
Do you think the average American knows who Adam Schiff is? Or would recognize pnwmom Jun 2021 #38
There also exists a possibility they didn't recognize it even AFTER they did the work, yes Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #40
Sounds like Apple really didn't give them much Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2021 #32
"WHAT THE F%#K ! monkeyman1 Jun 2021 #36
I bet if you went out onto any city street you'd find MOST people wouldn't recognize pnwmom Jun 2021 #39
hate to say it , but , ya got me on that one ! thank's !!! monkeyman1 Jun 2021 #41
There sure was a lot of dirt going on behind the scenes--and in the front, too. C Moon Jun 2021 #42
Of course they didn't know. After all, what are they? A software company? DFW Jun 2021 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Apple says it didn't know...