Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama Campaign Asks Wis DOJ For Action on GOP Voter Suppression Plans [View all]Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)10. Romney Campaign Training Poll Watchers To Mislead Voters In Wisconsin
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/10/30/1106961/romney-wisconsin-poll-watchers/
Mitt Romneys campaign has been training poll watchers in Wisconsin with highly misleading and sometimes downright false information about voters rights.
Here are four misleading or incorrect pieces of information disbursed by the Romney campaign:
CLAIM: Any person convicted of treason, a felony, or bribery isnt eligible to vote.
FACT: Once a person who has been convicted of a felony completes his or her sentence, including probation and fines, that person is eligible to vote.
CLAIM: The ONLY Acceptable Forms of Proof of Residency.
FACT: The list used is incomplete. There are many other documents people can use to prove residency that are not included, such as letters from public schools, student loan papers, correspondence with a Native American tribe in Wisconsin, vehicle registration, and food stamp correspondances. In addition, the list fails to mention that homeless voters may use an affidavit from a public or private social service agency as proof of residency.
CLAIM: If a handicapped voter is unable to come into the polls to vote, an assistant can deliver the ballot to the voter if the CEI verifies the electors proof of residency.
FACT: Under Wisconsin law, the CEI (Chief Election Inspector) does not have to verify proof of residency so long as the voter is registered.
CLAIM: Election Observers should not assist [voters].
FACT: A voter can ask for assistance from anyone, including a poll watcher, so long as the voter initiates the request and does not engage in electioneering.
Mitt Romneys campaign has been training poll watchers in Wisconsin with highly misleading and sometimes downright false information about voters rights.
Here are four misleading or incorrect pieces of information disbursed by the Romney campaign:
CLAIM: Any person convicted of treason, a felony, or bribery isnt eligible to vote.
FACT: Once a person who has been convicted of a felony completes his or her sentence, including probation and fines, that person is eligible to vote.
CLAIM: The ONLY Acceptable Forms of Proof of Residency.
FACT: The list used is incomplete. There are many other documents people can use to prove residency that are not included, such as letters from public schools, student loan papers, correspondence with a Native American tribe in Wisconsin, vehicle registration, and food stamp correspondances. In addition, the list fails to mention that homeless voters may use an affidavit from a public or private social service agency as proof of residency.
CLAIM: If a handicapped voter is unable to come into the polls to vote, an assistant can deliver the ballot to the voter if the CEI verifies the electors proof of residency.
FACT: Under Wisconsin law, the CEI (Chief Election Inspector) does not have to verify proof of residency so long as the voter is registered.
CLAIM: Election Observers should not assist [voters].
FACT: A voter can ask for assistance from anyone, including a poll watcher, so long as the voter initiates the request and does not engage in electioneering.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama Campaign Asks Wis DOJ For Action on GOP Voter Suppression Plans [View all]
midnight
Oct 2012
OP
The DOJ can't pick who they want to deal with. State AGs, no matter what party, control the data.
freshwest
Oct 2012
#20
This is why Obama should have replaced a lot of the State AGs, which I don't think he ever did. n/t
cui bono
Oct 2012
#30
How could he replace the state AGs elected and appointed by the states themselves?
freshwest
Oct 2012
#31
You're thinking of the US Attorneys--the federal prosecutors, not the state AGs.
Comrade Grumpy
Oct 2012
#34
Yes, you're right, that's what I was thinking of, thanks. Still a big mistake.
cui bono
Oct 2012
#35
Someone posted that his election numbers were more plentiful than there were voters...
midnight
Oct 2012
#7
Thanks Scuba... I'm hoping to see that there is better oversight to the actually counting of these
midnight
Oct 2012
#14
Good info... I hope Obama is going to insist these inconsistencies being hung on a wall to verify
midnight
Oct 2012
#12
I love it... and it's the obligatory first move. Now let's see how he responds...
Ellipsis
Oct 2012
#13
Classic posturing. Allow the opposition to to take a given opportunity to respond
Ellipsis
Oct 2012
#28
When Wis. A.J. doesn't respond to the Obama's request for help, let's hope this is what
midnight
Oct 2012
#37