Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Would NATO jets be able to stop incoming missiles? Chainfire Mar 2022 #1
Cruise missiles, yes William Seger Mar 2022 #36
Are Cruise missiles the bulk of what it destroying Ukrainian cities? Chainfire Mar 2022 #65
Don't know William Seger Mar 2022 #71
It sucks but Ukraine isn't in NATO. BlueTsunami2018 Mar 2022 #2
If NATO won't defend genocide in a huge country like Ukraine, why would they defend Latvia? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #5
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 onecaliberal Mar 2022 #8
Because they're part of the alliance. BlueTsunami2018 Mar 2022 #11
The FEAR of Putin using nukes will exist regardless of Article Five Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #22
It's a legitimate concern. BlueTsunami2018 Mar 2022 #48
Post removed Post removed Mar 2022 #63
The US did not commit genocide in Iraq. Stop whataboutism. mathematic Mar 2022 #77
Please get a grip. Ukraine is not a NATO member. I'm sorry too but that's the way it is. PSPS Mar 2022 #12
NATO membership won't change the FEAR of Putin using nukes. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #24
I disagree. Putin will fear that a Baltic invasion will unleash NATO and its "nukes." PSPS Mar 2022 #28
Well, if Putin remains in power, we will definitely find out. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #33
Yes, my friend. We're all just along for the ride to our collective future (if any!) PSPS Mar 2022 #35
There are lots of countries with genocide currently NickB79 Mar 2022 #47
None of those is in NATO's backyard. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #60
Because Latvia IS a member of NATO James48 Mar 2022 #70
He's right, you know. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #3
What does Ukraine have to do with Article V? Gore1FL Mar 2022 #14
The Baltics will be seized after Russia catches its breath following the Ukraine genocide. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #25
So in 2070? Gore1FL Mar 2022 #52
NATO is acting weak, while Putin acts strong. So far, Putin has called NATO's bluff. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #64
How is NATO acting weak(ly)? Gore1FL Mar 2022 #68
And I'll start dating Angelina Jolie NickB79 Mar 2022 #57
Putin only needs to remain in power to "succeed" in Ukraine, that's it. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #59
I agree. drray23 Mar 2022 #32
Does Zelensky has that bad advisers? TomWilm Mar 2022 #4
And this is why Putin will seize the Baltic states with ease, if he gets away with Ukraine. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #6
Nonsense PSPS Mar 2022 #9
I'm happy to be wrong about this, but Marie Yavanovich and Zelenskyy agree. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #13
Well, we all have our opinions, but I don't want to trigger a nuclear response until we have to. PSPS Mar 2022 #16
It's pretty clear he didn't get away with Ukraine. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #10
Putin "gets away" with Ukraine if he continues to sow destruction, and remains in power. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #15
Putin failed in Ukraine. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #19
Well, at least that buys us a few years to live Polybius Mar 2022 #84
I'm Sure Putin Has Thrown More Than 55% Of His Ground Forces Into Ukraine DallasNE Mar 2022 #34
Atricle 5 was invoked after 9/11. It was never meant to cover invasions of non-member states. PSPS Mar 2022 #18
I agree, this was a misstep on his part. It doesn't serve him well to bash NATO like this. PSPS Mar 2022 #23
Zelenskyy's Audience Is Not NATO & USA DallasNE Mar 2022 #39
Of coourse. But I'm worried about his "addressing" of Congress tomorrow. PSPS Mar 2022 #45
If it was up to him, NATO would be fighting Russia right now Polybius Mar 2022 #85
Article V has only been tested once and it came through. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #7
Someone just posted that Turkey tried to invoke Articke 5 re: Syria and was rebuffed Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #17
NATO doesn't need to use nukes. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #21
Then why aren't they in Ukraine? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #27
Because Ukraine is not a member of NATO. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #29
If Russia didn't have nukes, NATO would already be in Ukraine, regardless that they aren't in NATO Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #31
No. NATO should never threaten to use nuclear weapons. nt Gore1FL Mar 2022 #38
BZZZT WRONG! NATO and the US have indeed stated they would USE NUKES FIRST bluewater Mar 2022 #49
Look up "should" in the dictionary. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #51
" instead of stalking me" You mean replying to your posts and pointing out errors? bluewater Mar 2022 #53
You have failed to point out any errors, though. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #54
HUGE ERROR --- "We haven't gone to war since WWII." bluewater Mar 2022 #55
Per the parameters stated by the person who posted #30 Gore1FL Mar 2022 #58
I was responding to YOUR post. This what you posted: bluewater Mar 2022 #62
Thank for admitting you reply was out of context. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #67
LOL Yep, replying to what someone actually wrote is "out of context"... bluewater Mar 2022 #69
If you'd have looked you'd see that we were making the same point. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #72
Honestly, I don't think you presented a clear point at all. bluewater Mar 2022 #75
The clear point. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #76
Which seems to have little to do with this post you replied to: bluewater Mar 2022 #79
Now you are forgetting what you posted. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #80
So no substantial reply? bluewater Mar 2022 #81
Who said threaten? I just said Putin should be afraid NATO would use nukes. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #61
NATO policy has been to THREATEN to use nukes first actually, even against a conventional attack bluewater Mar 2022 #66
Nukes makes people lazy ... TomWilm Mar 2022 #44
Which is exactly why Ukraine was foolish to give up their nukes Polybius Mar 2022 #86
Read behind the lines ... TomWilm Mar 2022 #20
If NATO is as weak as people on DU seem to think it is, then Trump was right to want to get out. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #26
It has not always come through. former9thward Mar 2022 #30
Two Libyan SU-22's attacked U.S. planes in the gulf of Sidra in the early 1980s. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #37
"We haven't gone to war since WWII." bluewater Mar 2022 #40
When did congress pass the war declarations? Gore1FL Mar 2022 #43
"We haven't gone to war since WWII." LOL bluewater Mar 2022 #46
I didn't. The specific statement in post 30 that mentioned the congress declaration requirement. Gore1FL Mar 2022 #50
In the incident you describe the U.S. did not request NATO assistance. former9thward Mar 2022 #41
I am pretty sure Biden is an inside body. nt Gore1FL Mar 2022 #42
good analysis bluewater Mar 2022 #74
excellent points bluewater Mar 2022 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author Polybius Mar 2022 #87
Unless Putin really want to start WWIII I don't think he would attack a NATO country. marie999 Mar 2022 #56
We don't know if article 5 is weak or not. It hasn't been tested. Chainfire Mar 2022 #78
So you are saying the world is outraged. ripcord Mar 2022 #82
Oh how would he know? Polybius Mar 2022 #83
Ok. Someone explain to me why... Blue_playwright Mar 2022 #88
The impossibility of "closing the airspace" is just a myth NATO tell us TomWilm Mar 2022 #89
Thank you, that helps Blue_playwright Mar 2022 #90
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ukrainian President Zelen...»Reply #33