Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Grins

(7,218 posts)

20. Well there goes the Reich-wing's raging boner! Along with Durham's "valid reasons."

Reply to Yonnie3 (Original post)

Tue May 31, 2022, 01:14 PM

May 2022

Total horseshit from the git-go.

I got one of "those" emails back in February, the day Durham filed his motion (NOT an indictment) with the court saying it was proof of Hillary's sabotage of the Trump campaign. They were ABSOLUTELY SURE this would "Lock her up!"

I just let them know this news. What a great day!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sussmann, who worked for Clinton, acquitted of lying to FBI in 2016 [View all] Yonnie3 May 2022 OP

Can Sussman sue? Midnight Writer May 2022 #1

No, probably not. Malicious prosecution is a tough case to prove, Ocelot II May 2022 #7

Can John Durham now be removed? Budi May 2022 #2

I don't know, but it's clear now Mr.Bill May 2022 #8

Biden knew the only way to play hardball with this mob style revenge,is to simply keep handing them. Budi May 2022 #25

Apparently it would have to be a "for cause" removal by Garland BumRushDaShow May 2022 #9

Well this prosecution should be enough to get him fired. It was shit and they made Bev54 May 2022 #15

The timing might end up being tied to BumRushDaShow May 2022 #23

There is at least one more charged and I thought 2 but can only find this one. Bev54 May 2022 #26

I literally just found an article that mentioned a 2nd person and posted it BumRushDaShow May 2022 #29

K & R! 50 Shades Of Blue May 2022 #3

Finally an example of a witch hunt. gab13by13 May 2022 #4

I do believe this whole sham of an investigation and lawsuit was used to Bev54 May 2022 #16

"This was a distraction away from the Trump tower server connected to Alfa Bank in Russia." Yup! Botany May 2022 #19

Good news. sinkingfeeling May 2022 #5

Yes, the DOJ should now remove Durham STAT! He'll now lose the 2nd trial anyway. machoneman May 2022 #6

I called my 91-year-old right-wing mom this morning to see how she is doing, deurbano May 2022 #14

... mcar May 2022 #10

This was a very weak case LetMyPeopleVote May 2022 #11

Rt🤷‍♂️💖TY.. Perfect! Cha May 2022 #36

So is this the end of what Durham was working on TlalocW May 2022 #12

From the OP Lasher May 2022 #27

Well. Ok. kairos12 May 2022 #13

A pardon would be thrilling to them. StevieM May 2022 #17

I guess Durham was arguing.... Mustellus May 2022 #18

Well there goes the Reich-wing's raging boner! Along with Durham's "valid reasons." Grins May 2022 #20

Wonder how much this rabbit hole cost the taxpayers? djacq May 2022 #21

As of last December, it was almost $4 million BumRushDaShow May 2022 #24

And Sussman. Something like this could financially ruin most people. Scrivener7 May 2022 #37

Baseless accusation because the Fed interviewer already knew Sussman worked for Clinton campaign wishstar May 2022 #22

Yes. Both can be true exboyfil May 2022 #30

Recommended. H2O Man May 2022 #28

Stick a fork in Durham BlueIdaho May 2022 #31

From your keyboard to God's screen. calimary May 2022 #32

In the real world his career would be damaged. Mr.Bill May 2022 #33

Well, he's just incompetent enough BlueIdaho May 2022 #34

TY for the Gift, Yonnie! Cha May 2022 #35

Durham now joins Benghazi and Whitewater on the Clinton conspiracy trash heap Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2022 #38