Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,585 posts)
37. "Morganatic Marriage" - it's actually a thing (or was . . . )
Thu Sep 8, 2022, 07:38 PM
Sep 2022

Like Sophie, wife of Franz Ferdinand. She was considered of 'lowly' birth, so could never have become empress even if the two of them hadn't gone to Sarajevo.

Assuming Trump doesn't beat him to it.... durablend Sep 2022 #1
King Donald the Turd. generalbetrayus Sep 2022 #3
Two numbers for Donald the Turd traitor. GreenWave Sep 2022 #25
Yes all about trump even on threads dedicated to the new king. jimfields33 Sep 2022 #9
I was wrong. Aristus Sep 2022 #2
He's been Charles for 73 years so I'm not too surprised. NYC Liberal Sep 2022 #4
How about King Chuck? erronis Sep 2022 #13
With tongue firmly placed in cheek melm00se Sep 2022 #18
Chuckles? twodogsbarking Sep 2022 #19
chuckie? melm00se Sep 2022 #27
He has been known as Charles for a long time pandr32 Sep 2022 #5
I thought so too... FalloutShelter Sep 2022 #6
Well, now he can rehabilitate that tradition. calimary Sep 2022 #10
Charles II wasn't that unpopular muriel_volestrangler Sep 2022 #11
They were Stuarts though FakeNoose Sep 2022 #32
By that logic, one can also eliminate Retrograde Sep 2022 #36
Well, here's hoping he's a more fortuitous monarch than Charles I (and II) hlthe2b Sep 2022 #7
Not an especially auspicious name in British history Warpy Sep 2022 #24
Hoping he is not subject to pootin's kompromat SheltieLover Sep 2022 #8
Well, I hope he enjoys it. He's waited long enough. Martin68 Sep 2022 #12
Queen Consort, I think. Aristus Sep 2022 #14
Right-o. Martin68 Sep 2022 #15
That's closer to reality. paleotn Sep 2022 #29
"Morganatic Marriage" - it's actually a thing (or was . . . ) hatrack Sep 2022 #37
No, they created a new title for her. OnlinePoker Sep 2022 #16
I don't care what they call her as imo the title should have belonged to Diana. cstanleytech Sep 2022 #17
Exactly. Scottie Mom Sep 2022 #20
She scrubbed up well, as my English neighbor said this evening. GoneOffShore Sep 2022 #22
At the end of the day PlutosHeart Sep 2022 #21
I'm afraid I don't really believe they are "people like everyone." There doesn't seem to be a great Martin68 Sep 2022 #43
Any wife of a reigning (Monarch) king. . . Collimator Sep 2022 #33
Just call her "The Dowager" and leave it at that. Coventina Sep 2022 #40
Yep. Collimator Sep 2022 #42
The Post reports that Charles can make her Queen if he wants to. His mother bestowed the title Martin68 Sep 2022 #44
I thought he might go for George VII . . . markpkessinger Sep 2022 #23
I've always thought George VI should have been Albert I. cab67 Sep 2022 #41
At least a person with environmental awareness The Mouth Sep 2022 #26
Amen to this n/t Lulu KC Sep 2022 #35
Unlike pretty much every single Tory in the new government, starting with Liz Truss . . . hatrack Sep 2022 #38
Chuck cubed. paleotn Sep 2022 #28
Had he thrown a dart at his full name, he might have become King Arthur. Harker Sep 2022 #30
This would be a great time for the Brits to put the monarchy to bed. Chainfire Sep 2022 #31
Maybe Charles will be the last. It probably depends on the popular reaction to his reign. Martin68 Sep 2022 #45
For some reason Lulu KC Sep 2022 #34
Weird royal trivia - among Charles' many ancestors - one Vlad Tepes, Voivode of Wallachia hatrack Sep 2022 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Britain's new monarch to ...»Reply #37