Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'Decisions are imminent' on charges in Trump's effort to overturn 2020 election in Georgia [View all]getagrip_already
(14,750 posts)8. No, and no....
First, the impeachments weren't overturned. The impeachment was by the house and stands. The senate didn't convict, but that is not overturning.
And scotus has yet to rule in tfgs favor on the matter of the law wrt to him personally.
So no reason to believe they will carve out any exceptions for him now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Decisions are imminent' on charges in Trump's effort to overturn 2020 election in Georgia [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jan 2023
OP
"has recommended multiple indictments and her decision on whether to bring charges is imminent."
Botany
Jan 2023
#1
Your advice boils down to: Give up, hand the keys to the Authoritarians, go home. No, no, no. . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#9
You called the effort futile. Are you now saying you routinely advise people to do futile things?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#15
Yes. But nonsense needs to be stepped on or it propagates. . . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#18
I'm not gatekeeping. Nothing I posted said they can't post. I call it nonsense. Poster doesn't
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#24
"Your opinion carries absolutely no more weight". You are correct. But you contradict yourself
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#26
Neither was I issuing a formal treatise. I don't have to and neither do they. :eyes:
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#31
I shared my opinion of the poster's opinion. That's debate. I scolded their opinion for nonsense
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#45
Read the OP. They must be kept sealed because charging decisions are being made. . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2023
#10
She has to present the case(s) to a regular Grand Jury and ask them to vote to indict.
Justice matters.
Jan 2023
#16
A President tried to overturn an election and he gets fined? If anyone is going
Scrivener7
Jan 2023
#42
Ditto. Make it imminent as in today. Im dyin' from old age having to wait here
onetexan
Jan 2023
#33