Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court rules against EPA in dispute over regulating wetlands [View all]BumRushDaShow
(128,965 posts)49. Well it's actually worse than just that
He is starting to cement the conservative court's push for the elimination of the authority and decisions made by the Executive Branch agencies who actually carry out the law.
You see it already happening with the current attempts to "legislate from the bench" by even accepting a case that would override the authority of the FDA to review and evaluate products under their Congressional mandate, and instead "deem" that a FDA-approved product (mifepristone - originally called "RU-486" as FYI), that has been considered "GRAS" (Generally Recognized As Safe) for almost a quarter of a century, is not, because a bunch of right-wing loons "don't like it".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court rules against EPA in dispute over regulating wetlands [View all]
BumRushDaShow
May 2023
OP
Creating a dystopian environmental future, repealing one EPA regulation at a time. nt
OAITW r.2.0
May 2023
#4
All nine concurred that the specific land/wetlands at issue in this case did not meet the
KPN
May 2023
#23
Not exactly. The decision set aside the agency's determination that the wetland involved was
KPN
May 2023
#30
Probably because it was narrow, pretty much focused on this one property owner
BumRushDaShow
May 2023
#38