Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
72. Check it out.
Sun Jul 28, 2013, 07:49 PM
Jul 2013
http://gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14991:the-bad-seed-the-health-risks-of-genetically-modified-corn

Thursday, 25 July 2013 22:06

"Elle" magazine should be congratulated for its courage in publishing this remarkable article by Caitlin Shetterly about her successful effort to regain her health by eliminating GM corn from her diet.

We would only add that Shetterly is not alone. We've received a number of accounts from Americans who have recovered (or whose children have recovered) from serious and often life-threatening illness by taking the single step of eliminating GMOs from their diet.

Sometimes they've worked out the cause of their illness by themselves; in other cases they've taken the advice of an insightful doctor or other health professional.

http://www.elle.com/beauty/health-fitness/allergy-to-genetically-modified-corn

Caitlin Shetterly
Elle, 24 Jul 2013


...While I quickly discovered that blaming GMO foods for any kind of health problem is controversial in the medical and biotech worlds, what’s beyond debate is the increase in the incidence of autoimmune disorders such as type 1 diabetes, lupus, and celiac disease, as well as of allergies. As for the latter, the National Health Interview Survey found, for instance, that since 1999, the number of children with food allergies has jumped by 50 percent, and those with skin allergies by 69 percent (and the increase isn’t merely a by-product of fuller reporting by parents, experts say).

Allergenic eosinophilic disorders, however, aren’t counted in that data. They were first identified about 20 years ago, according to a pioneer in the field, Marc Rothenberg, MD, PhD, a professor at University of Cincinnati medical school and director of an affiliated center for eosinophilic disorders. “We’re in the midst of an allergy and autoimmune epidemic,” Rothenberg told me on the phone, “and the environment is the black box.” Mansmann’s GMO theory was “interesting”, he went on, before quickly adding that “no one in conventional medicine will have the data” to prove it.

<>


Link from excellent GMO news aggregating site: http://gmwatch.org/index.php?option=com_dategroup
Major K&R. closeupready Jul 2013 #1
Dear Monsanto .. 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #2
The best thing the U.S. can do is to dump Monsanto's GMO foods too. avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #3
+1 sakabatou Jul 2013 #4
Fat Chance LiberalLovinLug Jul 2013 #7
It's different in Europe DFW Jul 2013 #5
Daily shopping too tazkcmo Jul 2013 #14
Yeah, our fridge is no bigger even today DFW Jul 2013 #15
I just figure that... SoapBox Jul 2013 #6
Third eyes actually can improve vision. True. closeupready Jul 2013 #8
This describes the hysterics to a T roseBudd Jul 2013 #19
That's silly. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #28
That's silly. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #29
More historical context. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #54
More. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #30
You demonstrate my point with confirmation bias roseBudd Jul 2013 #34
Forget Seralini; try 118 articles on glyphosate from 'US National Library of Medicine' publications. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #41
I hate Monsanto, but where's the evidence that eating GM foods is bad for you? alp227 Jul 2013 #9
At least by making its labelling mandatory dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #10
That is all I'm asking for. Let me make the choice, indeed! eom Purveyor Jul 2013 #51
I'm sure you can volunteer to guinea pig for human testing closeupready Jul 2013 #12
Yep. laundry_queen Jul 2013 #59
There's plenty of evidence..... DeSwiss Jul 2013 #13
You mean like the botulism, created by Nature, or how about that natural roseBudd Jul 2013 #17
It works slowly. DeSwiss Jul 2013 #20
Very scientific claims there to back up your beliefs roseBudd Jul 2013 #22
Fraudulent science, how about sick kids? These findings give support to The Precautionary Principle proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #33
Fail. that is not evidence. roseBudd Jul 2013 #35
"Because while our children may only represent 30% of the population, they are 100% of our future." proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #42
Pusztai? Embarrassing. That the antis have nothing but bad science should tell you something roseBudd Jul 2013 #57
Pusztai is a heavy-hitter, as described in post #43. No contest. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #60
Logical fallacy Argument from Authority roseBudd Jul 2013 #62
ABSOLUTELY FALSE -"Peer review tells us that...Pusztai performed shoddy research." proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #65
This, too. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #43
Again Pusztai. Embarrassing roseBudd Jul 2013 #58
Replacement link. proverbialwisdom Dec 2013 #75
Ironic you'd mention risk factors. Here's a 2009 Press Release from Breast Cancer Action about rBGH. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #49
I was wondering when the Monsanto roody Jul 2013 #23
I am not a Monsanto folk, I research before I jump on band wagons roseBudd Jul 2013 #36
Courtesy Michael Hansen, PhD Senior Scientist, Consumer Reports: Monsanto, GM foods & Health Risks. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #46
And climate change deniers have Roy Spencer also a PHD roseBudd Jul 2013 #63
FALSE - "The vast majority of scientists agree that biotech food is safe. " The field is evolving. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #64
Climate change deniers do the same thiing. They flock to that roseBudd Jul 2013 #67
+1000 this is a giant waste of time... roseBudd Jul 2013 #18
The consequences are a failed business model. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #31
I imagine it's easier to trivialize and minimize the person than it is to take valid exception LanternWaste Jul 2013 #53
Check it out. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #72
"'no one in conventional medicine will have the data' to prove it"?? alp227 Jul 2013 #73
Oh, it's just a single case history, but wait for the GMO labeling laws to be implemented. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #74
K&R DeSwiss Jul 2013 #11
This is the left's climate change denial... roseBudd Jul 2013 #16
There's no point. crim son Jul 2013 #24
You can shop at Whole Paycheck, no one is preventing you from paying too roseBudd Jul 2013 #37
Um, take your Frankenfood shill act closeupready Jul 2013 #44
Whole Paycheck is full of GMOs! roody Jul 2013 #45
FYI, claims of altruistic and humanitarian motives are explored in investigative reports here. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #47
IAASTD examined global agriculture on scale comparable to Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #48
Check it out. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #32
Al Gore: The challenges raised by human biotechnologies on par with those of global climate change. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #50
Yea! Now let's do that in the US! blackspade Jul 2013 #21
Is European science crim son Jul 2013 #25
That is not evidence roseBudd Jul 2013 #39
you really are outnumbered here .... chillfactor Jul 2013 #52
K&R MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #26
Good to see felix_numinous Jul 2013 #27
It is not condescending to point out bad science. roseBudd Jul 2013 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author felix_numinous Jul 2013 #40
Clearly SPAM is not gmo n/t mathematic Jul 2013 #55
Witty. nt proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #56
More. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #61
Europe has its own ag-biotech companies--GMOs are here to stay Dagny_K Jul 2013 #66
GMO is needed to deal with 9 billion future humans & climate change roseBudd Jul 2013 #68
GMOs are Here to stay Dagny_K Jul 2013 #69
GMOs save arable land. GMOs given the opportunity can prevent over fishing, roseBudd Jul 2013 #70
Financial Times says Europe right to doubt GM crops. proverbialwisdom Jul 2013 #71
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»No more GMO: Monsanto dro...»Reply #72