Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
9. No - Warren is against mandatory labeling, and this could even prevent voluntary labelling
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 09:14 PM
Sep 2013

As the OP states:

If the FDA heeds Senators Warren and Udall, the agency could use the voluntary guidance to preempt state laws requiring mandatory labeling of GMOs. Currently, states have the right to enact GMO labeling laws precisely because the FDA has not formally ruled on GMO labeling. Once it does, state laws could be overturned.

The FDA’s guidance on voluntary GMO labeling also could be used to put an end to existing, legitimate voluntary non-GMO labeling efforts. By allowing the FDA, which has previously (and controversially) ruled that GMO and non-GMO foods are “substantially equivalent,” the FDA could rule against non-GMO or GMO-free labels on the basis that they mislead consumers by implying that there’s a difference between GMO and non-GMO foods.


She also voted against a bill earlier this year, as reported by PR Watch:
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2013/05/12125/us-senate-votes-down-state-gmo-labeling

U.S. Senate Votes Down State GMO Labeling

by Rebekah Wilce — May 29, 2013 - 7:43am

In the midst of a week of debates and speeches about the federal farm bill (S. 954), supporters of the right to know whether or not food products contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs) suffered a setback on May 23. An amendment (S. Amdt. 965) sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT) would have helped states to pass laws requiring labeling of GMO foods. (Vermont recently made history when its House of Representatives passed such a labeling bill, as CMD reported.) Sander's amendment lost, 27-71.

<snip>

Among the surprising votes against the amendment were those of Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Tammy Baldwin (D-WI). The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) reached out to both Senators' offices for comment, but did not receive responses. Massachusetts is a stronghold of the biotechnology industry, and Wisconsin grows quite a bit of genetically engineered corn and soy.

Meanwhile, Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Harry Reid (D-NV) voted for the bill, marking a switch from their no-votes when a similar amendment was introduced in 2012. Food and Water Watch, a non-profit group that works to ensure clean water and safe food, notes that other notable supporters included senators from states "with active grassroots campaigns to pass state laws on GE labeling, including both senators from Alaska, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Oregon, Vermont, Washington and West Virginia, as well as Senator Bennett from Colorado, Senator Tester from Montana ..., [and] Senator Heinrich from New Mexico ..." (New York and Nevada also have active GMO labeling campaigns).

<snip>
That's upsetting. Wilms Sep 2013 #1
What's upsetting? Javaman Sep 2013 #2
Apparently they referenced the docket which calls for voluntary labeling only. cui bono Sep 2013 #4
I read it. Wilms Sep 2013 #6
No - Warren is against mandatory labeling, and this could even prevent voluntary labelling bananas Sep 2013 #9
I think where she and Udall want to take this, is ... Myrina Sep 2013 #32
180 degrees out. Nihil Sep 2013 #17
No labelling is why I don't buy anything inch4progress Sep 2013 #3
Agree. And welcome to DU! cui bono Sep 2013 #5
Thanks, and I love your Warren net-bumper sticker:) inch4progress Sep 2013 #12
If they don't mandatory label Hydra Sep 2013 #7
Organic food cannot contain GMOs cprise Sep 2013 #10
They're loosening the rules Hydra Sep 2013 #11
I already buy food that says nonGMO certified lunasun Sep 2013 #8
"Organic" is a huge scam. Archae Sep 2013 #13
Have you tasted the difference? icymist Sep 2013 #14
Yes. Archae Sep 2013 #16
I don't know about you, but I taste a real big difference. icymist Sep 2013 #30
Spend sometime on an organic farm.... BronxBoy Sep 2013 #18
The big problem is "organic" is just a brand name. Archae Sep 2013 #20
The overwhelming majority BronxBoy Sep 2013 #24
You're either "forgetting" or ignoring one major component of organic farming, kentauros Sep 2013 #19
You want "organic" fertilizer? Archae Sep 2013 #22
There are all kinds of organic fertilizer that don't include kentauros Sep 2013 #23
Pretty sure it's the latter.... BronxBoy Sep 2013 #27
I know :) kentauros Sep 2013 #29
Thank you! I had a small commercial organic farm for several years. You clearly have Zorra Sep 2013 #34
The word 'organic' is miss-used in some cases. our food labeling system sucks in the USA. Sunlei Sep 2013 #31
Cool story, bro. Zorra Sep 2013 #33
Booo this stupid law. icymist Sep 2013 #15
This proves the fact the only time you agree with yourself is 100% of the time. JRLeft Sep 2013 #21
Proud member of OGA roody Sep 2013 #25
That the industry is against labels says it all. Democracyinkind Sep 2013 #26
Consumers want clear HONEST labeling on ALL products. Quit scamming people Corps.! Sunlei Sep 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Organic Consumers Opposes...»Reply #9