Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(31,182 posts)

17. And the *complementary set* of *non-ACA supporters* would be whom?

Thu Dec 19, 2013, 06:59 PM

Dec 2013

I see it as a huge improvement.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Report: Obamacare To Cost 'Billions Of Dollars Less Than Originally Projected' [View all] Botany Dec 2013 OP

Obamacare’s Secret Success Kolesar Dec 2013 #1

I am not terribly fond of this argument. Laelth Dec 2013 #2

Raining on the parade zipplewrath Dec 2013 #6

I hear you. Laelth Dec 2013 #7

And the *complementary set* of *non-ACA supporters* would be whom? Kolesar Dec 2013 #17

Ya beat me to it. malthaussen Dec 2013 #10

Precisely. n/t Laelth Dec 2013 #11

The point was never to save money, it should cost more marshall Dec 2013 #14

How many billions is that? OneCrazyDiamond Dec 2013 #3

So, we were lied to? Freddie Stubbs Dec 2013 #4

That's how the Teabaggers will see it, for sure. (nt) Paladin Dec 2013 #15

The purpose of the law is to save money. Gore1FL Dec 2013 #12

Imagine how much more cost effective it would be... happyfunball Dec 2013 #16