Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
23. Don't worry, the nuclear industry has a plan to clean up tar sands production
Mon Dec 30, 2013, 11:48 AM
Dec 2013
Nuclear Technology & Canadian Oil Sands: Integration of Nuclear Power with In-Situ Oil Extraction
A.E. FINAN, K. MIU, A.C. KADAK
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 24-105 Cambridge, MA 02139-4307

Abstract - This report analyzes the technical aspects and the economics of utilizing nuclear reactors to provide the energy needed for a Canadian oil sands extraction facility using Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) technology. The energy from the nuclear reactor would replace the energy supplied by natural gas, which is currently burned at these facilities. There are a number of concerns surrounding the continued use of natural gas, including carbon dioxide emissions and increasing gas prices. Three scenarios for the use of the reactor are analyzed 1) using the reactor to produce only the steam needed for the SAGD process; (2) using the reactor to produce steam as well as electricity for the oil sands facility; and (3) using the reactor to produce steam, electricity, and hydrogen for upgrading the bitumen from the oil sands to syncrude, a material similar to conventional crude oil. Three reactor designs were down-selected from available options to meet the expected mission demands and siting requirements. These include the Canadian ACR- 700, Westinghouse’s AP 600 and the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR). The report shows that nuclear energy would be feasible, practical, and economical for use at an oil sands facility. Nuclear energy is two to three times cheaper than natural gas for each of the three scenarios analyzed. Also, by using nuclear energy instead of natural gas, a plant producing 100,000 barrels of bitumen per day would prevent up to 100 megatonnes of CO2 per year from being released into the atmosphere.

http://web.mit.edu/pebble-bed/papers1_files/OilSands.pdf

Alberta Tar Sands
Nuclear Power in Canada Appendix 2

(Updated February 2010)
In Canada, notably northern Alberta, there is major production of synthetic crude oil from bitumen extracted from tar sands. Alberta's tar sands are one of the largest hydrocarbon deposits in the world. Production from them is expected to grow strongly, but may limited by the amount of greenhouse gases emitted during extraction and upgrading of the bitumen. Open pit strip mining remains the main extraction method, but two in situ techniques are likely to be used more in future: cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) and steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD). These methods inject steam into the formation to heat the bitumen, allowing it to flow and be pumped to the surface.

<snip>

Nuclear power could make steam and electricity and use some of the electricity for high-temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production. (Heavy water and oxygen could be valuable by-products of electrolysis.) The steam supply needs to be semi portable as tar sand extraction proceeds, so relatively small reactors which could be moved every decade or so may be needed. One problem related to the provision of steam for mining is that a nuclear plant is a long-life fixture, and mining of tar sands proceeds across the landscape, giving rise to very long steam transmission lines and consequent loss of efficiency.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Country-Profiles/Countries-A-F/Appendices/Nuclear-Power-in-Canada-Appendix-2--Alberta-Tar-Sands/
Wow, no one could EVER have predicted that! hatrack Dec 2013 #1
Don't worry, the nuclear industry has a plan to clean up tar sands production kristopher Dec 2013 #23
This is how an industry bulldozes into a complex environment with a token EIS & does lasting damage. hue Dec 2013 #2
Immediately fine and tax them (or seize assets if needed) to pay for the COMPLETE clean-up. on point Dec 2013 #3
I'll second that! another_liberal Dec 2013 #7
I never knew the history of the term "mad hatter." Laelth Dec 2013 #4
So long, and thanks for all the (contaminated) fish... jtuck004 Dec 2013 #5
You know of course that mercury is a heavy medal and can't float on water? RC Dec 2013 #8
First, I really don't care what someone who is too lazy to read a link thinks, jtuck004 Dec 2013 #9
Then don't post stupid stuff without an explanation, so people think you believe it. RC Dec 2013 #11
I don't care enough to. And now I care even less. Thanks for the heads up. n/t jtuck004 Dec 2013 #12
do you care a little more now? snooper2 Dec 2013 #27
Small drops of mercury can, due to surface tension starroute Dec 2013 #19
That's like saying... reACTIONary Dec 2013 #26
Tar Sands & Fracking are Total Insanity (R - Planetary Plunder Style) Berlum Dec 2013 #6
I think mercury (in our fish, to start with) is what is causing Americans to act so insane. loudsue Dec 2013 #10
That could explain the Tea party marsis Dec 2013 #17
Mmm-hmm. And DU. loudsue Dec 2013 #18
It's all insanity knowing what we know mountain grammy Dec 2013 #13
Read what happened in Minimata, Japan due to severe mercury poisoning LiberalEsto Dec 2013 #14
Mercury toxicity is no fun bucolic_frolic Dec 2013 #15
Mercury needs watching. Reference "Minimata disease" and W. Eugene Smith's photographs. nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2013 #16
there`s zero news articles about this in the all of the american news media. madrchsod Dec 2013 #20
Not in the news bucolic_frolic Dec 2013 #21
I've pretty much given up. Stonepounder Dec 2013 #22
Humankind surely 'doesn't have a prayer' if your attitude prevails. Peace Patriot Dec 2013 #29
A sputtering torch Stonepounder Dec 2013 #30
Very interesting observation that depressing people is deliberate as snagglepuss Dec 2013 #31
Don't give up! another_liberal Dec 2013 #34
Does anyone have a link to a map of the affected area? theHandpuppet Dec 2013 #24
The research hasn't been published yet. kristopher Dec 2013 #28
Thanks. I look forward to reading an update... theHandpuppet Dec 2013 #32
More great tar-sands news! blackspade Dec 2013 #25
Mercury levels are even higher where those products are used csziggy Dec 2013 #33
Is Canada still morally superior to the United States? Honestly, I've lost track. Pterodactyl Dec 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Researchers find 7,300-mi...»Reply #23