Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: 3 killed at Maryland mall [View all]mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)It's highly relevant to the point I'm making.
That point, specifically, is that having laws against something is not sufficient reason to condemn an action, when those laws are systematically selectively applied. Also, when the laws are being made to benefit one group at the detriment of another group - the TPP laws will benefit corporations at the expense of regular people - there is no longer a moral reason to follow those laws. Furthermore, continuing to play by the rules while the rules are not being changed to be more fair, and are in fact being changed to be more UNfair, makes it immoral to keep following them. That perpetuates and supports an unfair system.
I made no comments about what you, personally are doing. I merely argued the point that you seem to be making is immoral. You may find my moral "loathsome" (which is personal) and either you don't understand the point I'm making or you think it's right to support an unfair system or the unfair application of a system. Then you're just one more person I have to fight in order to change said unfair system.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):