Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: States look to gun seizure law after mass killings [View all]Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)24. Of course we all know that three of the six
were stabbed to death with a knife.
And now California and New Jersey officials are debating gun seizure laws, both in the aftermath of the killings of six people near the University of California, Santa Barbara in May.
They should add knives also I would think.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gun rights advocates advocate for domestic terrorists, who are also a danger to themselves or others
onehandle
Jul 2014
#1
if this were the only kind of victim, the matter would take care of itself in short order
yurbud
Jul 2014
#83
... it seems like trying to win at Whac-A-Mole. Guns are so pervasive, it seems one would
RKP5637
Jul 2014
#2
'Temporarily seized' is adequate. It's a safety measure like roping off a flooded street.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#5
Suicide is killing oneself, one being a human, hence the word "homicide"
Starboard Tack
Jul 2014
#55
Apart from removing guns from the equation, I can't think of any. Can you?
Starboard Tack
Jul 2014
#68
"It may be typical of the anti-gun side, which I do not belong to."
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2014
#64
I've seen many court decisions where they are NEVER allowed to possess a firearm again, LOL.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#30
No, I suggest from the stories here, that his mother was on the verge of having him involuntarily
freshwest
Jul 2014
#85
It's not ownership in that case. It's access. He would be removed from the guns.
freshwest
Jul 2014
#87