Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

drokhole

(1,230 posts)
Thu Dec 24, 2015, 06:12 PM Dec 2015

What Really Happened With the DNC’s “Datagate”? (from Jacobin) [View all]

What Really Happened With the DNC’s “Datagate”? (Jacobin)

The definitive explanation of the Democratic National Committee’s “Datagate” scandal and what the mainstream media got wrong.
by Björn Westergard

Last Wednesday morning around 10:40 AM, NGP VAN, the company whose software hosts the Democratic National Committee’s voter file, released a routine software update. The update introduced a bug that allowed members of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaigns, among others, to filter the voter records they share using “scores” they do not share (about which more shortly). For the next hour or so, members of Sanders’ staff ran twenty-five searches using scores generated by the Clinton campaign; their intentions in doing so are now the subject of heated dispute. By noon, NGP VAN staff were aware of the issue and had taken steps to fix it.

By Friday, the DNC — which brokers access to VAN/VoteBuilder and mediates disputes between its users — went public with the story and ordered NGP VAN to deny the Sanders campaign access. Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook accused the Sanders campaign of deliberately stealing data to gain a competitive edge. The Sanders campaign fired its data director, Josh Uretsky, and Uretsky, taking full responsibility for the actions of his subordinates, insisted they had only intended to document the problem. Hoping for an injunction to regain access, the Sanders camp sued the DNC in federal court.

By Friday evening, the DNC had given the go-ahead for access to be restored, and by Saturday morning it had been. As a practical matter, the story ends here. But recriminations continue.

I was a software developer for NGP VAN from the summer of 2011 through the spring of 2015, having first heard of the company as a volunteer in the 2008 Obama primary campaign. While at NGP VAN, I contributed to a system through which the scores at the center of this dispute can be loaded into the voter file. The Voter Activation Network (“the VAN”), which the DNC brands as “VoteBuilder,” is also employed by foreign political parties, the AFL-CIO, NGOs, and — surprisingly, for a brief period in 2013 — Uber.

Amusing as it’s been to find that some of the technical minutiae of my old job has become a hot topic of conversation, coverage of the story so far has been tendentious and often plainly inaccurate. The Clinton campaign has exploited the obscurity of the software and the institutional context in which it’s used to grossly mischaracterize the actions of Sanders staffers. That said, Uretsky’s statements of intent do not accord with the logs released by NGP VAN.

more at the link
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Interesting article Gothmog Dec 2015 #1
How could this "harm" the Clinton campaign? artislife Dec 2015 #12
That seems to be the author's conclusion... drokhole Dec 2015 #15
He mentioned they could not even get that detail without being able to download the data newthinking Dec 2015 #17
Agreed drokhole Dec 2015 #20
Nonsense. The strategy and thinking of the Clinton GOTV efforts is probably pretty obvious JDPriestly Dec 2015 #36
Sanders spins the facts when he says campaign did not 'go out and take' Clinton data Gothmog Dec 2015 #55
So it is the Clinton campaign has exploited the software, now could this Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #2
is that the new talking point? grasswire Dec 2015 #5
According to the OP, thought it was strange myself. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #37
I think it is exactly like he said. He wanted to be able to prove that the breach had occurred. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #6
++++ Voice for Peace Dec 2015 #9
I agree. We are talking about computer nerds here. They will mess with data just to see JDPriestly Dec 2015 #32
Maybe he can use this for his defense. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #38
Clinton camp circling the wagons ... Fantastic Anarchist Dec 2015 #14
Nope, not circling the wagons, just waiting for the audit results. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #39
The author, formerly and admin of the software, said that neither campaign could get far without newthinking Dec 2015 #18
We've discussed this before. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #34
I was commenting on the OP, perhaps responding to the OP where Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #40
If you are talking about the Kroll audit, don't count on it. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #42
All of this does not excuse the fact the breach occurred. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #43
The breach is the fault of NGP Van. They admit there was a bug in a release on the website. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #49
The NGP Van was nkt fired by Sanders. Who forced Sanders staff members to look at Clinton's Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #50
The staff did not breach the data. They were given permission to search and view the data JDPriestly Dec 2015 #51
Wow. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #53
Did Sanders fire one of his staff members and suspend two more? Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #52
Very interesting, thanks. SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #3
The document has been pulled from the Internet!! grasswire Dec 2015 #4
I am still getting it LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #7
not me grasswire Dec 2015 #8
It's still there for me. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #10
ditto. n/t JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #11
Yep, still there. n/t bvf Dec 2015 #45
I just read the article and shared it on Twitter and Facebook underthematrix Dec 2015 #13
This basically shows the analysis by myself and another IT admin was correct. This is POLITICAL not newthinking Dec 2015 #16
Great OP! drokhole Dec 2015 #21
Going off the summary of the log they provided Jarqui Dec 2015 #23
I tend to believe Uretsky's statement about his intent to document the extent of the breach JDPriestly Dec 2015 #29
I can't vouch for every single word Uretsky said. Only a good audit can Jarqui Dec 2015 #35
"It's political not substantive." I agree with the political part. That was the point. pnwmom Dec 2015 #27
Maybe he discovered something so fascinating that he threw caution to the wind. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #30
It really wasn't that big of a deal passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #19
Or rather a BERNghazi! drokhole Dec 2015 #22
I prefer Wassergate! Fuddnik Dec 2015 #25
Ach ja! drokhole Dec 2015 #33
Bad metaphor. Benghazi was where Libyan weapons were stored and from where weapons JDPriestly Dec 2015 #26
Hmmm...not so sure passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #31
Jacobin tries to determine based on the searches what the intent of Bernie's Sanders JDPriestly Dec 2015 #24
If I'm in Uretsky's or the Sanders campaign's boots and I'm concerned with Jarqui Dec 2015 #28
There is something odd about the response to this article. Kalidurga Dec 2015 #41
No. Please just tell me. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #46
The lack of Hillary supporters jumping all over the article Kalidurga Dec 2015 #47
Gotcha. Thanks. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #48
I have the opposite feeling; whenever good points are raised by those qualified to say so, they run. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #54
What truely amazes me here is that any campaign is storing sensitive data under the control RichVRichV Dec 2015 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author SunSeeker Dec 2015 #56
Unanswered Questions benjamindavidsteele Feb 2016 #57
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»What Really Happened With...