Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)What Really Happened With the DNC’s “Datagate”? (from Jacobin) [View all]
What Really Happened With the DNCs Datagate? (Jacobin)
The definitive explanation of the Democratic National Committees Datagate scandal and what the mainstream media got wrong.
by Björn Westergard
Last Wednesday morning around 10:40 AM, NGP VAN, the company whose software hosts the Democratic National Committees voter file, released a routine software update. The update introduced a bug that allowed members of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanderss presidential campaigns, among others, to filter the voter records they share using scores they do not share (about which more shortly). For the next hour or so, members of Sanders staff ran twenty-five searches using scores generated by the Clinton campaign; their intentions in doing so are now the subject of heated dispute. By noon, NGP VAN staff were aware of the issue and had taken steps to fix it.
By Friday, the DNC which brokers access to VAN/VoteBuilder and mediates disputes between its users went public with the story and ordered NGP VAN to deny the Sanders campaign access. Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook accused the Sanders campaign of deliberately stealing data to gain a competitive edge. The Sanders campaign fired its data director, Josh Uretsky, and Uretsky, taking full responsibility for the actions of his subordinates, insisted they had only intended to document the problem. Hoping for an injunction to regain access, the Sanders camp sued the DNC in federal court.
By Friday evening, the DNC had given the go-ahead for access to be restored, and by Saturday morning it had been. As a practical matter, the story ends here. But recriminations continue.
I was a software developer for NGP VAN from the summer of 2011 through the spring of 2015, having first heard of the company as a volunteer in the 2008 Obama primary campaign. While at NGP VAN, I contributed to a system through which the scores at the center of this dispute can be loaded into the voter file. The Voter Activation Network (the VAN), which the DNC brands as VoteBuilder, is also employed by foreign political parties, the AFL-CIO, NGOs, and surprisingly, for a brief period in 2013 Uber.
Amusing as its been to find that some of the technical minutiae of my old job has become a hot topic of conversation, coverage of the story so far has been tendentious and often plainly inaccurate. The Clinton campaign has exploited the obscurity of the software and the institutional context in which its used to grossly mischaracterize the actions of Sanders staffers. That said, Uretskys statements of intent do not accord with the logs released by NGP VAN.
more at the link
The definitive explanation of the Democratic National Committees Datagate scandal and what the mainstream media got wrong.
by Björn Westergard
Last Wednesday morning around 10:40 AM, NGP VAN, the company whose software hosts the Democratic National Committees voter file, released a routine software update. The update introduced a bug that allowed members of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanderss presidential campaigns, among others, to filter the voter records they share using scores they do not share (about which more shortly). For the next hour or so, members of Sanders staff ran twenty-five searches using scores generated by the Clinton campaign; their intentions in doing so are now the subject of heated dispute. By noon, NGP VAN staff were aware of the issue and had taken steps to fix it.
By Friday, the DNC which brokers access to VAN/VoteBuilder and mediates disputes between its users went public with the story and ordered NGP VAN to deny the Sanders campaign access. Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook accused the Sanders campaign of deliberately stealing data to gain a competitive edge. The Sanders campaign fired its data director, Josh Uretsky, and Uretsky, taking full responsibility for the actions of his subordinates, insisted they had only intended to document the problem. Hoping for an injunction to regain access, the Sanders camp sued the DNC in federal court.
By Friday evening, the DNC had given the go-ahead for access to be restored, and by Saturday morning it had been. As a practical matter, the story ends here. But recriminations continue.
I was a software developer for NGP VAN from the summer of 2011 through the spring of 2015, having first heard of the company as a volunteer in the 2008 Obama primary campaign. While at NGP VAN, I contributed to a system through which the scores at the center of this dispute can be loaded into the voter file. The Voter Activation Network (the VAN), which the DNC brands as VoteBuilder, is also employed by foreign political parties, the AFL-CIO, NGOs, and surprisingly, for a brief period in 2013 Uber.
Amusing as its been to find that some of the technical minutiae of my old job has become a hot topic of conversation, coverage of the story so far has been tendentious and often plainly inaccurate. The Clinton campaign has exploited the obscurity of the software and the institutional context in which its used to grossly mischaracterize the actions of Sanders staffers. That said, Uretskys statements of intent do not accord with the logs released by NGP VAN.
more at the link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
57 replies, 7967 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (32)
ReplyReply to this post
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
He mentioned they could not even get that detail without being able to download the data
newthinking
Dec 2015
#17
Nonsense. The strategy and thinking of the Clinton GOTV efforts is probably pretty obvious
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#36
Sanders spins the facts when he says campaign did not 'go out and take' Clinton data
Gothmog
Dec 2015
#55
I think it is exactly like he said. He wanted to be able to prove that the breach had occurred.
LiberalArkie
Dec 2015
#6
I agree. We are talking about computer nerds here. They will mess with data just to see
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#32
The author, formerly and admin of the software, said that neither campaign could get far without
newthinking
Dec 2015
#18
The breach is the fault of NGP Van. They admit there was a bug in a release on the website.
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#49
The NGP Van was nkt fired by Sanders. Who forced Sanders staff members to look at Clinton's
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#50
The staff did not breach the data. They were given permission to search and view the data
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#51
This basically shows the analysis by myself and another IT admin was correct. This is POLITICAL not
newthinking
Dec 2015
#16
I tend to believe Uretsky's statement about his intent to document the extent of the breach
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#29
"It's political not substantive." I agree with the political part. That was the point.
pnwmom
Dec 2015
#27
Maybe he discovered something so fascinating that he threw caution to the wind.
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#30
Bad metaphor. Benghazi was where Libyan weapons were stored and from where weapons
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#26
Jacobin tries to determine based on the searches what the intent of Bernie's Sanders
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#24
I have the opposite feeling; whenever good points are raised by those qualified to say so, they run.
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#54
What truely amazes me here is that any campaign is storing sensitive data under the control
RichVRichV
Dec 2015
#44